Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado court: Workers can be fired for using pot off-duty
Associated Press ^ | Jun 15, 2015 5:05 PM EDT | Kristen Wyatt

Posted on 06/15/2015 4:54:14 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Pot may be legal in Colorado, but you can still be fired for using it.

The state Supreme Court ruled 6-0 Monday that a medical marijuana patient who was fired after failing a drug test cannot get his job back. The case was being watched closely by employers and pot smokers in states that have legalized medical or recreational marijuana.

Colorado became at least the fourth state in which courts have ruled against medical marijuana patients fired for pot use. Supreme courts in California, Montana and Washington state have made similar rulings, and federal courts in Colorado and Michigan also have rejected such claims.

The Colorado worker, Brandon Coats, is a quadriplegic who was fired by Dish Network after failing a 2010 drug test. The company agreed that Coats wasn’t high on the job but said it has a zero-tolerance drug policy. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: cannabis; dopersrights; drugtest; lifestylechoice; marijuana; offduty; pot; smokers; tobacconazis; wod; zerotolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: DesertRhino

Especially if you are a quadraplegic and limited to the practical jokes you can play on your bored coworkers.


41 posted on 06/16/2015 5:51:58 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Well the strict libertarian tells the pot head to start his own company or search the classifieds and ask each hiring manager he manages to get an interview with if they have a drug policy

Naw, ask HR when an offer is made.

So now every pot head must start his own company or find a company that goes out of its way to hire the potheads that no one else wants.

Or stop smoking pot.

42 posted on 06/16/2015 6:55:02 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Coats argued that his pot smoking was allowed under a state law intended to protect employees from being fired for legal activities off the clock. [...] The Colorado justices ruled that because marijuana is illegal under federal law, Coats' use of the drug couldn't be considered legal off-duty activity.

Quislings.

43 posted on 06/16/2015 6:56:44 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

It should be up to the employer


44 posted on 06/16/2015 6:57:17 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: grania
Marijuana is legal in CO. I hope I can always find a place to live where it isn't. That being said, this decision is bothersome. What's next? Firing people who smoke, consume alcohol, eat junk food, have tattoos? If it were an illegal substance there, I'd say fine.

Fast food restaurants used to avoid hiring people with a lot of ink. You may have noticed that is a thing of the past. They would have no one to hire if they stayed with that policy.

45 posted on 06/16/2015 6:58:42 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Of those born of women there is not risen one greater than John The Baptist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
It should be up to the employer

Natural law agrees with you - but Colorado law does not.

46 posted on 06/16/2015 7:05:49 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
The company can change its employment terms to allow pot usage for medical conditions and contractually he would be in the clear with them. It is not likely the company will do this because the feds consider marijuana to be a controlled substance.

True. This is going to be a problem until the Feds decide to take marijuana off Schedule I, where it never belonged in the first place. Regardless of your opinion about legalization, pot is not like heroin.

47 posted on 06/16/2015 9:55:33 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I’ve always thought drug test indicate lazy supervisors when people’s lives are not on the line. As a supervisor I want production. If an employee is producing, I want the guy working for me. If not then get rid of his ass. In other words I would never drug test a productive employee, but might be tempted to test a minority or disabled non-productive employee.


48 posted on 06/16/2015 10:08:35 AM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1
NO...... the detectable metabolites of pot stay in your system longer.

That really can't be repeated enough. The metabolites stay, the active ingredient wears off in a matter of hours. It is the metaboites that a drug test detects. Of course, lies being what they are, nobody on the Nanny State side of the argument will point that out.

49 posted on 06/16/2015 10:44:56 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They should also be able to fire anyone who uses alcohol off hours too. What’s good for the goose...


50 posted on 06/16/2015 10:52:18 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Well, railroads have “Rule G”, which does forbid consumption of alcoholic beverages by crew members (especially engineers) on call.


51 posted on 06/16/2015 12:53:28 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: umgud

You do know that most police departments don’t even ask the question of pot use to new applicants anymore because it would make the hiring pool too small...


52 posted on 06/16/2015 1:08:02 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

You’re probably right. I hear a lot of police depts can’t diversify due to their minority’s criminal records.


53 posted on 06/16/2015 1:42:48 PM PDT by umgud (When under attack, victims want 2 things; God & a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yea, that makes sense if you’re on call and might have to go to work at a moment’s notice. I did the “on call” thing much of my career and it definitely put a damper on things that way.


54 posted on 06/16/2015 2:50:39 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson