Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Can Be Prosecuted for Clearing Your Browser History
The Nation ^ | June 2, 2015 | Juliana DeVries

Posted on 06/07/2015 9:46:26 AM PDT by TaxPayer2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: usconservative

Suppose you withdraw $500/week from ATMs over the course of a year. Is that suspicious activity?


61 posted on 06/07/2015 3:47:16 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Well put.


62 posted on 06/07/2015 4:49:53 PM PDT by Valin (I'm not completely worthless. I can be used as a bad example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

A free program, ccleaner, can not only clear you browser history, but clear the space with 35 overwrites of ones and zeros...just saying


63 posted on 06/07/2015 5:57:08 PM PDT by The Great RJ (“Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.” Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo CYlrmrI.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


64 posted on 06/07/2015 6:01:43 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yup. Three felonies a day like the book title says.


65 posted on 06/07/2015 6:27:57 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Suppose you withdraw $500/week from ATMs over the course of a year. Is that suspicious activity?

Nope. Not a high enough dollar amount to be considered anything near "suspicious" activity.

Banks are more concerned about withdrawls matching a pattern, and dollar amounts within a certain amount of $10k. Some banks are more "strict" than others about where that amount is as the Fed's don't give prescriptive guidance other than "$10k."

For the record, I think the law is stupid, and $10k isn't really that much money anymore. In 1970 dollars, it's more like $1,600. Drug dealers, etc.. launder money in far higher amounts than $10k and don't need banks to do it.

66 posted on 06/07/2015 6:58:14 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

I use MRU-Blaster and CCleaner at the end of every day. You’d be amazed how much MRU-Blaster pulls out in a day.

https://www.brightfort.com/mrudownload.html


67 posted on 06/07/2015 9:16:19 PM PDT by B4Ranch (When buying + selling are controlled by legislation, the first things bought + sold are legislators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
You do realize that you ended your sentence with a preposition?

Of course I realized. It is a very old joke.

68 posted on 06/08/2015 1:34:45 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Mossberg 930 SPX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
Makes the 18th century Brits look like pikers...

I wonder what the founding fathers would be doing by now?

69 posted on 06/08/2015 3:13:50 AM PDT by Mark17 (Through all my days, and then in Heaven above, my song will silence never, I'll worship Him forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
Good morning.

I wonder what the founding fathers would be doing by now?

Shooting.

5.56mm

70 posted on 06/08/2015 5:48:35 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
I wonder what the founding fathers would be doing by now?

Shooting.

I believe you are correct sir. 😎

71 posted on 06/08/2015 6:22:44 AM PDT by Mark17 (Through all my days, and then in Heaven above, my song will silence never, I'll worship Him forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: sport

And there they got ya. Rand stated it best - they want to make so many things criminal that a person cannot go through one day without breaking a law.

Then those in power can choose whether to prosecute you or not,
based on various factors, including political loyalty.


72 posted on 06/08/2015 6:25:31 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrB

You are one of the few [populationwise]that understands.


73 posted on 06/08/2015 6:49:07 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Only if you’re constantly doing stuff that would make your browser history evidence of a crime. Taking out the trash is legal, unless there’s bloody gloves from where you murdered somebody in there, then its destruction of evidence.

That's stupid. How many people are arrested and not tried or found not guilty of a crime in the US. With this you have an end around where you don't even have to nail someone with an initial crime. Just deleting browser history. If you don't think something like that could happen, see what the IRS, ATF and OSHA did someone who was trying to start a PAC.

74 posted on 06/08/2015 7:11:31 AM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

Destroying evidence has been illegal for a long long time. I don’t even think it’s a new development to consider your browser history evidence. And yes they do have to have some reason to suspect you first, otherwise they’ve got no reason to think there’s evidence.


75 posted on 06/08/2015 8:10:44 AM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Destroying evidence has been illegal for a long long time. I don’t even think it’s a new development to consider your browser history evidence.

And I've been known to delete my browser history so my wife won't get the popups on her computer that tell her which gifts I'm looking at. Also being a Freeper, I investigate a lot of stories I read here and may go to some nefarious sites. If you put these two activities together I could to be guilty of a felony. With more and more people thinking like you we are close to embracing a police state.

76 posted on 06/08/2015 8:24:54 AM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

No those facts don’t put you in line for a felony. It’s people thinking like you that make us look like paranoids with no grounding in reality. Evidence destruction laws are very well established with over 100 years of jurisprudence. This guy got in trouble specifically for deciding the evidence trail on his friends might go through his computer and deliberately destroying the evidence. Unless you’ve got some wrong doing you’re trying to hide there is NOTHING AT ALL illegal about clearing your history. This is known, understood, and documented, and trying to pretend like this case changed any of that is just making crap up.


77 posted on 06/08/2015 8:48:08 AM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: discostu
It’s people thinking like you that make us look like paranoids with no grounding in reality.

And it's people like you who are totally blind to all the things the government and the judicial system are doing to take away our freedoms.

78 posted on 06/08/2015 9:18:06 AM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

Again, over 100 years. The guy simply handled the situation incorrectly. If your friends blew something up and you think they might have looked up bomb stuff on your computer the absolute WRONG thing to do is clear your cash. Because once you decide to do that you ARE committing a crime (which has been a crime for a long time) and the only question left is whether you’ll get caught. Nobody is losing freedoms on this. And by grossly and deliberately mischaracterizing the situation you devalue complaints when they actually ARE taking away our freedoms. It’s a boy who cried wolf situation, this is not a wolf.


79 posted on 06/08/2015 9:23:23 AM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
I wonder what the founding fathers would be doing by now? Shooting. I believe you are correct sir. 😎 ----------- Before they started shooting, they'd take us to the wood shed and give us a well deserved whipping for letting things get this far out of hand. :) Then most of us would join them in the shooting.
80 posted on 06/08/2015 7:41:00 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson