More is never enough.
Diversity is the destruction of Good.
>http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2014/07/diversity-destruction.html<
...Diversity is an anti-religion, and anti-ideology, a nepotism which promotes everything except one’s own family.
Diversity therefore equals the destruction of any and all religions and of all positive ideologies.
Because Diversity can only be destructive: whatever IS is insufficiently or inexactly diverse.
Whatever IS must therefore be destroyed in order to make it MORE Diverse.
And there is no conceivable or measurable end to it. Yesterday’s Diversity is today’s intolerable lack of Diversity.
Diversity is the destruction of Good; and it is the destruction of all types of Good - however defined. All are chewed up and spat out by Diversity.
Diversity is the promotion of chaos by the destruction of Good; and then there-naming of chaos as Good.
Just loved the “excrement map”. Had never seen that before. ROFL. And, the hypocrisy rolls on....
‘Diversity’ is a euphemism for eliminating the white man. To the extent it doesn’t serve that purpose, it is not ‘diversity’.
In the Great Salad Bowl of diversity, whites are the iceberg lettuce. Adding more of us just takes away space for the “good stuff” of diversity.
Non-whites moving into a neighborhood is diversity. Whites moving into a neighborhood is gentrification.
Nobody complained when the Hispanics moved the bums out of the Mission District.
97% of one group is diverse? lol
Ethnic Minorities Deserve Safe Spaces Without White People
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3293206/posts
I don’t know much about SanFran, but I know that it is rare here to run into a Hispanic/Latino who is not Caucasian-almost all of us are. Latinos who are black have roots in the Caribbean-Cuba, Puerto Rico, etc-or one of a few areas in Central and South America, and most of the Asian ones are from the Philippines. Is it that different in Cali?
And why does it matter in any case-why are people there that obsessed with who moves into their neighborhoods as long as they aren’t gang bangers and criminals?
All the upper middle class white journalists at the Times would prefer a ghetto to a safe, clean neighborhood. The utter degeneracy of the Left never fails to sicken.
White devils only move to such areas to drive out the minorities, to steal their culture and to diminish their rights derived from occupation.
In other words these anti-American enclaves want no exposure to American culture, Constitutional Freedoms and Rule of Law, all of which are far superior and more excellent than they care to know.
Like Unions the enclaves need to be busted, this should become a trend that only the bravest of Americans will pursue, we should all be tired of running.
BTW has anyone else noticed by way of political correctness being American is becoming synonymous with being White.
Diversity = No White Men.
My school was worried because more neighborhood kids are choosing the school. (Gr 6-12) in the past few years, it’s gone from less than 1% to about 7%, and about 26% of the incoming 6th graders are white.
I don’t see how this is a problem for diversity. All groups need to be represented if all groups all going to live together. And here’s the sickest part of it, the designation white includes the large influx of Middle Easterners,mwho are definitely in the cultural minority — and many of them are English language Learners, which actually means more money for the school. But they’re worried about numbers. Percentages. Crazy.
The people who are obsessed with race and the “right” quotas of race are insane.
I lived in SF for 10 years in the 70s-80s. The Mission was never all Hispanic. There were always plenty of whites and other races living there. I suspect what they are complaining about is that low income Hispanics can no longer afford to live there. Same with blacks in the Filmore district. The rent is too damned high!
So-called diversity is ONLY the White race in retreat.
Once the United States is populated by Hispanics and Blacks, and Whites are living in caves somewhere, while America’s Asian population has vanished, only then will America be “diverse.”
The Times tries to frame it in economic terms; the poor Hispanics pushed out by the rich White people. But when does the Times ever complain about poor Hispanics moving into housing in a White neighborhood and affecting property values? Never.
Newsmachete totally gets New York Times hypocrisy... Great read - thanks for posting.
The real conversation on race is starting... liberals aren’t going to be as thrilled as they imagined....
I stood up at a school meeting one time and hollared, “Why are you pinkos so obsessed with human hides? Just leave people alone, you bully.” Then I laughed. So did the audience.
There was a story some time ago that said Chicago was the most segregated city in America or thereabouts. I wonder, where are the least segregated neighborhoods?
I realize it makes a huge difference how you define your categories (white-black-asian, etc.) or (nonhispanic white-nonhispanic black-hispanic white-hispanic black-why not hispanic asian (filipino?), etc.)