Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Brilliantly Defends Keeping 'Under God' in Pledge
Truth Revolt ^ | May 15, 2015 | Trey Sanchez

Posted on 05/16/2015 6:39:58 AM PDT by Twotone

New Jersey Judge David F. Bauman recently dismissed a case orchestrated by a student, his parents, and the American Humanist Association and ruled that hearing the words "under God" during the Pledge of Allegiance does not violate the constitutional rights of atheist students. In his decision released Monday, Bauman brilliantly laid to rest the notion that the phrase can, or should, be erased from America's history.

(Excerpt) Read more at truthrevolt.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: allegiance; blogpimp; pledge; virusalert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 05/16/2015 6:39:58 AM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Twotone

We need to deploy a next tact by prominently exposing these law firms who support this eradication of our heritage.


2 posted on 05/16/2015 6:48:03 AM PDT by bestintxas (every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

REFRESHING!


3 posted on 05/16/2015 6:50:45 AM PDT by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

It was brilliant, American history proves his points; now STFU poor little atheists.


4 posted on 05/16/2015 6:50:57 AM PDT by PROCON (CRUZing into 2016 with Ted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Excellent response by the court.


5 posted on 05/16/2015 6:51:06 AM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Personally, I have a problem with the ‘under God’ phrase in the Pledge of Allegiance.

When I learned the Pledge in kindergarten it hadn’t been added yet, so sometimes I stumble there!

Aside from that minor issue, I want ‘under God’ kept there to remind us where we came from and help keep the next generations on track. I figure every little bit helps.


6 posted on 05/16/2015 6:52:59 AM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Diagonally parked in a parallel universe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
Protecting students from viewpoints and ideas that may offend or upset them is not and has never been the role of public schools in America.

This statement needs to be published at every university in these United States.

7 posted on 05/16/2015 6:54:15 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

These days I almost need to ask: “did this come from the Onion?”

Common sense? not so common anymore...


8 posted on 05/16/2015 6:59:21 AM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

A favorable ruling would make the Constitution unconstitutional. I like that one.


9 posted on 05/16/2015 7:02:25 AM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jonno

> Common sense? not so common anymore...

If common sense really was common, it wouldn’t have a special name.


10 posted on 05/16/2015 7:03:37 AM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Diagonally parked in a parallel universe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

“As a matter of historical tradition, the words ‘under God’ can no more be expunged from the national consciousness than the words ‘In God We Trust’ from every coin in the land, than the words ‘so help me God’ from every presidential oath since 1789, or than the prayer that has opened every congressional session of legislative business since 1787,” the judge wrote in his decision.

Bauman added, “The Pledge of Allegiance, in this historical context, is not to be viewed, and has never been viewed, as a religious exercise.”

The student’s lawsuit, filed last year, argued against the phrase being recited during school hours because he felt it singled out atheists and non-believers, making them feel like “second-class citizens.” His attorneys argued that hearing the pledge would cause atheist students to feel “just as America’s Jews, Hindus, and Muslims would feel excluded, marginalized and stigmatized if they were told by their government on a daily basis that the United States is one nation ‘under Jesus.’”

However, Judge Bauman didn’t see it that way. He explained that the various references to God in the nation’s history, documents, and practices indicates no endorsement of a specific faith, but simply a recognition to the importance religion has played in the founding of America.

The unnamed student tried for equal protection under the New Jersey state constitution, only to be reminded by Bauman that it also references “Almighty God:”

Under plaintiffs’ reasoning, the very constitution under which plaintiffs seek redress for perceived atheistic marginalization could itself be deemed unconstitutional, an absurd proposition which plaintiffs do not and cannot advance here. Protecting students from viewpoints and ideas that may offend or upset them is not and has never been the role of public schools in America.

Judge Bauman advised the student to remain silent during the Pledge of Allegiance if he so chooses. There are no plans to appeal the decision.


11 posted on 05/16/2015 7:04:57 AM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2LT Radix jr; 80 Square Miles; A Ruckus of Dogs; acad1228; AirForceMom; Alas Babylon!; Anti-MSM; ...

“As a matter of historical tradition, the words ‘under God’ can no more be expunged from the national consciousness than the words ‘In God We Trust’ from every coin in the land, than the words ‘so help me God’ from every presidential oath since 1789, or than the prayer that has opened every congressional session of legislative business since 1787,” the judge wrote in his decision.

Bauman added, “The Pledge of Allegiance, in this historical context, is not to be viewed, and has never been viewed, as a religious exercise.”


12 posted on 05/16/2015 7:14:00 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

“The phrase “under God” was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance on June 14, 1954, by a Joint Resolution of Congress amending § 4 of the Flag Code enacted in 1942.[18]”


13 posted on 05/16/2015 7:15:55 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
I don't really see what the hubbub's about.

When I recite the Pledge of Allegiance in a public forum, I always leave out the word "indivisible". That is my pledge of allegiance to the country. I don't believe that, under all circumstances, the United States is "indivisible". I can foresee a number of situations where, in keeping with my oath as a soldier, it becomes patriotic and necessary to separate myself (my county, my State) from the United States. I support Texas independence; that makes the word "indivisible" meaningless in a pledge that I can currently make to the United States.

If the atheists don't like "under God", just don't say it when reciting the pledge of allegiance.

14 posted on 05/16/2015 7:32:47 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Well, I yelled "FIRE!" because no one would save me if I yelled "CHOCOLATE!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
Judge Brilliantly Defends Keeping 'Under God' in Pledge

I don't know that the Judge's defense is "Brilliant" but it is certainly a minimal defense which should have been put forth decades ago.

I will point out that the US Constitution does itself mention Jesus, and it exempts the President from working on Sunday. (Obviously because that is the Christian Sabbath.)

This nation was never intended to accommodate Atheists. If they feel like second class citizens, that's because they are ill suited to live in a nation that is specifically intended to be Christian.

Look at what Lincoln had to say about the matter.


15 posted on 05/16/2015 7:35:23 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
Judge Bauman...explained that the various references to God in the nation's history, documents, and practices indicates no endorsement of a specific faith, but simply a recognition to the importance religion has played in the founding of America.

It's a shame he attributes the existence of God to a human traditions and venerations rather than affirming that that God exists. Proving that God (Infinity) exists is prima facie beyond human comprehension; however a majority of people in the U.S. and around the world have intuitively concluded that a Higher Power does exist and is therefore stipulated by our documents to be Real; proof that He is not Real should fall on the petitioner, not the state.

Acknowledging that God exists does not mean that the Pledge is a prayer to Jesus per se, even if Christians believe Jesus is a part of a triune God.

16 posted on 05/16/2015 7:52:04 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (The "legacy of slavery" is not an excuse for inexcusable behavior. --Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

The other day I was listening to an old broadcast from Rev J. Vernon McGee. It was probably from the early 70s. He said these people are not atheists, they are anti-Christian. It’s always amazing how right and prophetic that man was.


17 posted on 05/16/2015 7:55:21 AM PDT by uncitizen (Pamela Geller - Peaceful Protestor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen
Rev. McGee is/was truly inspirational to listen to.

I used to hear his sermons on a local Christian radio station, superb messages.

18 posted on 05/16/2015 8:04:18 AM PDT by PROCON (CRUZing into 2016 with Ted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Yes he is!


19 posted on 05/16/2015 8:35:31 AM PDT by uncitizen (Pamela Geller - Peaceful Protestor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

When is the Right going to stop their fetishization of the Pledge of Allegiance? It wasn’t written by Jefferson and Madison!

The Pledge explicitly denies—”one nation...indivisible”—the NATURAL RIGHT of secession, which is laid out in the Declaration of Independence—the right of the people to “alter or abolish” an abusive government. The Declaration was an act of secession.


20 posted on 05/16/2015 9:17:32 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson