Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds to return $107G they seized from NC business owner, attorneys say
Fox News ^ | May 14, 2015 | Barnini Chakraborty & Kelley Vlahos

Posted on 05/14/2015 3:57:48 PM PDT by jazusamo

Lyndon McLellan fought the law -- and apparently, he won.

The North Carolina business owner for months has been battling the federal government after IRS agents last fall seized $107,000 from him, under a controversial practice known as civil forfeiture. But his attorneys at the Institute for Justice announced Thursday that the IRS and Department of Justice have moved to dismiss the case and give him back his money.

“What’s wrong is wrong, and what the government did here was wrong,” McLellan said in a statement Thursday. “I just hope that by standing up for what’s right, it means it won’t happen to other people.”

FoxNews.com reported earlier this week on McLellan's struggle to get his money back. The Institute for Justice said the feds moved to drop their case on Wednesday. Asked about the claim, an IRS official told FoxNews.com they could not comment on the case; a representative with DOJ has not yet responded to a request for comment.

McLellan is just one of thousands of Americans the IRS has seized money from, supposedly for “structuring” funds to avoid a law requiring banks to alert the government of deposits over $10,000. The law was instituted to help the government ferret out drug dealers, terrorists or other criminals -- but the IRS occasionally flags deposits of just under $10,000 as suspicious even if there's no evident criminal wrongdoing, in turn ensnaring people who may be innocent.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: civilforfeiture; doj; extortion; forfeiture; irs; lyndonmclellan; moneyseizure; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
According to the Institute for Justice, in many civil forfeiture cases, the government will make a deal with the owner where he or she will agree to turn over half their seized money in order to make a lengthy and costly legal fight go away.

I'm no lawyer but that sounds like extortion by the government to me.

1 posted on 05/14/2015 3:57:48 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Who is going to pay for his legal expenses and the mental hell he has been put through?


2 posted on 05/14/2015 4:01:44 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They should have to pay double.


3 posted on 05/14/2015 4:02:24 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

That’s the sad part about this, he has to pay legal fees and suffer through it.


4 posted on 05/14/2015 4:04:57 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Agreed!


5 posted on 05/14/2015 4:06:49 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
They should have to pay double.

That's a start, but the government agents involved don't care, because it's not their money, it's yours/ours. There should be serious career damage to government employees who do this sort of thing, along with the compensation you suggest.

People act as if "due process" exists when you can bankrupt yourself against the unlimited resources of the government in defense, and that isn't taken into account. In effect, the government, or a petty bureaucrat of the government, can find you guilty and fine you the cost of proving your innocence, or worse, with no risk. And, maybe it's a plus on their resume, too.

6 posted on 05/14/2015 4:13:12 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This is one of the many reasons to end the War on Drugs.


7 posted on 05/14/2015 4:18:11 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A free society canÂ’t let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous extremists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Not even close to enough.

The money, plus his normal rate of return, plus lost opportunity costs, plus any loans, plus interest he had to take out, plus mental distress, plus attorney fees....THEN triple damages because it was capricious and a gross misuse of power.

I would say, depending on the attorney time and effort, between $500,000 and $750,000.


8 posted on 05/14/2015 4:18:12 PM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

9 posted on 05/14/2015 4:21:27 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
From the article:
Two months ago, the government offered McLellan 50 percent of his money back and warned him against chasing publicity, even going so far as to suggest it would rile people inside the IRS and could hurt his chances of seeing his cash again, his attorneys said. “Today the the DOJ is giving him 100 percent,” said Institute for Justice spokesman J. Justin Wilson. “We got him an enormous amount of publicity – and it did work.” Wilson said McLellan had other resources to keep his business, “L & M Convenience Mart,” open since last October. But he had to fork over $3,000 for his initial legal fees, and some $19,000 for an accountant to audit his business to prove to the government there wasn’t anything untoward going on. The government said it will not repay those costs or any interest on the seized money.
This is simply OUTRAGEOUS. The IRS is acting like the Mafia. Worse.
10 posted on 05/14/2015 4:33:36 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The federal civil forteiture law has been drawing critical attention in the news media for some time. I think that most Americans see the law as inherently contradictory to basic due process laws and private property rights in this country. It’s time for Congress to simply repeal the law. Who will be the Republican and Democrat leaders to step up and sponsor the bill in the House and the Senate?


11 posted on 05/14/2015 4:37:16 PM PDT by Avid Coug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
The IRS is acting like the Mafia. Worse.

I couldn't agree more. It's not just a case of lack of common sense, it's an extortion racket they're purposely running in my view.

12 posted on 05/14/2015 4:37:36 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

While I hate them, I will give the Church of Scientology credit for one thing—they are the only group I know of that out bullied the IRS. For decades the IRS refused to recognize them as a religion for tax exempt status, and claimed they owed hundreds of millions. When the IRS put a tax lien on their HQ, they followed L. Ron Hubbard’s dictum to never defend, always attack. They infiltrated members into the IRS and hired PIs to dig up dirt on everyone at the IRS who worked on the case. They stole massive amounts of documents, and claimed unknown parties just dropped them off. Then they filed multiple lawsuits against not only the IRS, but the employees involved, even demonstrated at their homes. Like all bullies, the IRS is better at dishing it out than taking it. Eventually they waived most of the money “owed” and settled for a one time payment of 12.5 million in exchange for tax exempt status for the church and over 100 subsidiary organizations.


13 posted on 05/14/2015 4:40:08 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Avid Coug

You are correct but with the number of RATS and RINOs at the present time I doubt there’s enough patriots to pass the repeal.


14 posted on 05/14/2015 4:40:31 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

They seized money from this guy, but not a sitting governor of New York who was definitely structuring payments. All in an attempt to hide violations of federal laws against procuring prostitutes across state lines. He got to walk, “in the interest of justice.”


15 posted on 05/14/2015 4:41:52 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

The WoD is only today’s excuse.

They can pretend that the cash “may” represent ANY illegal activity.

These agencies are using this tactic as a fund raising tactic, not to mention all of the cool toys they confiscate.


16 posted on 05/14/2015 4:43:47 PM PDT by G Larry (Obama Hates America, Israel, Capitalism, Freedom, and Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The law was instituted to help the government ferret out drug dealers, terrorists or other criminals

Or so they claimed - and the jackboot-lickers ate it up.

17 posted on 05/14/2015 4:51:34 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

It’s all about power. If you are a member of the ruling elite, you can get away with almost anything.


18 posted on 05/14/2015 4:59:20 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A free society canÂ’t let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous extremists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Interest? Lawyer fees? Opportunity cost? Punitive damages so this doesn’t happen to the next innocent business owner?

Well at least it didn’t cost any federal scum their salary to return this man his money.


19 posted on 05/14/2015 4:59:48 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

amazing! This was all round the early 1990s


20 posted on 05/14/2015 5:01:40 PM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson