Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chris Christie’s Expense Account: Drinks Were on Him
NY Times ^ | 05/11/2015 | Alan Rappeport

Posted on 05/11/2015 9:29:37 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey likes to point out how he has made big cuts to state spending. But when it comes to using his allowance money as governor, he appears happy to be a high roller.

Records obtained by New Jersey Watchdog show that Mr. Christie spent more than $360,000 of his state allowance during his first five years in office, with 80 percent of that going toward food, drinks and desserts. He receives an annual allowance of $95,000, on top of his salary of $175,000, to be used for entertaining and hosting official receptions.

~snip~

Mr. Christie also spent over $100,000 on groceries and alcohol at retail stores such as Wegman’s Food Market and ShopRite, where his bills averaged more than $1,000 per spree. Whether he was stocking his personal pantry or making the purchases to cater official events was unclear from the records, but a spokesman said such expenses typically go toward receptions and state functions.

~snip~

Mr. Christie’s grocery bills dropped off drastically, according to New Jersey Watchdog’s analysis, in 2013 after the governor had a surgical procedure to help him lose weight.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chrischristie; gope; jerseyrino; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Holy Moses!
1 posted on 05/11/2015 9:29:37 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
The taxpayers of New Jersey ought to be super glad ol' Krispy Kreme lost all that weight.

 


2 posted on 05/11/2015 9:32:33 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Christie spent more than $360,000 of his state allowance during his first five years in office, with 80 percent of that going toward food, drinks and desserts.

Hard to believe.

He doesn't look like he ate more than $250,000 worth himself.


3 posted on 05/11/2015 9:35:51 AM PDT by Iron Munro (We may be paranoid but that doesn't mean they aren't really after us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Now, if the NY Times would just do that kind of scrutiny of Mr. & Mrs. Obama. Nah...wrong party.


4 posted on 05/11/2015 9:38:32 AM PDT by Eric (Don't Blame me...I voted for the Right people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I don’t recall the Times having a problem when Pelosi spent that much to stock her US jumbo jet with booze to drink on her weekly personal trips to San Fran all on the taxpayer dime.


5 posted on 05/11/2015 9:39:02 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Must be nice to have no marketable skill and land a job with a $175,000 payday and a $95,000 allowance for whatever.


6 posted on 05/11/2015 9:43:33 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Reading from the article, ‘catered events for state receptions and special events, which the report said was “more consistent with the stated purpose of the allowance.”

Just another piece to attack.


7 posted on 05/11/2015 9:49:56 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The original piece:

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/241612-report-christie-spent-300000-in-taxpayer-money-on-food


8 posted on 05/11/2015 9:52:30 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Just because I do not care for Mister Christie (and I absolutely do not)- -

The selective indignation of the nyt toward the non-progressives is both scandalous and offensive.

As is rightly pointed out above, these types of corrupt excesses are much more likely to be the business-as-usual for the Dems.

.

9 posted on 05/11/2015 9:55:41 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Watchdog show that Mr. Christie spent more than $360,000 of his state allowance during his first five years in office, with 80 percent of that going toward food, drinks and desserts. He receives an annual allowance of $95,000, on top of his salary of $175,000, to be used for entertaining and hosting official receptions.

Umm, no Christie-Kreme fan here but wouldn't "entertaining and hosting official receptions" require that money be spent on food, drinks, and deserts? If one reads the article he basically spent the money on exactly what it was designated for. The string of Rats before him put that allowance into law but now that a republican is in charge the NYT acts as though using is it somehow nefarious. They go so far as to insinuate that he is buying his personal groceries with the money (I'm sure some passive aggressive sissy at the NYT thinks it's a clever fat joke) with absolutely no proof.

10 posted on 05/11/2015 10:07:17 AM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

So, he was budgeted to have the money to spend on food and drink for State functions. He spent the money on food and drink for State functions. And now there is a story about how he followed the law?

Not a big fan of Christie, but maybe the story here shouldn’t be about how he followed the law, but more why the State authorizes this kind of expenditure.


11 posted on 05/11/2015 10:07:18 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
ahaha this crew..... is hard at work editing the Crisp Crisoie TV Special which wil.... I'm told...consist of nothing but video of crisp...eating and drinking




12 posted on 05/11/2015 10:21:54 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I am no fan of Christie, but it's pathetic to watch the leftists form so many stone throwing parties around him for doing the EXACT same things they embrace on their side of the aisle.

Whatever the law is, obey it. If the law sucks and wastes taxpayer money, change the law and then obey that.

13 posted on 05/11/2015 10:26:32 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

And with expenses of $360,000, over five years, averages out to $72,000 per year. Yet the Budget is $95,000. So he’s actually coming in under budget.

If the Times wanted to have a meaningful comparison, compare the expenses of Jon Corzine with Chris Christie.


14 posted on 05/11/2015 10:49:48 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dead

Another “electable” RINO


15 posted on 05/11/2015 10:51:06 AM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

And it looks he consumed most of it.


16 posted on 05/11/2015 10:58:28 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Can’t stand Christie, but isn’t is interesting that we never see such articles in the NYT about the Wookie’s extravagant spending?


17 posted on 05/11/2015 11:28:41 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

If you remember this pales in comparison to pelosi’s alcohol bill to the taxpayers.

http://www.businessinsider.com/nancy-pelosis-in-flight-food-and-drink-costs-101000-2010-1


18 posted on 05/11/2015 11:39:16 AM PDT by barmag25 (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

And only 80 percent was spent on food and beverage - so that’s 288,000.


19 posted on 05/11/2015 11:40:40 AM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Someone should clue the NYT in to the fact that Crisco was never going to be a serious contender for the nomination so they can cease and desist with the hit pieces already.


20 posted on 05/11/2015 12:02:08 PM PDT by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson