Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Middle Class Fades, So Does Use of Term on Campaign Trail
The New York Times ^ | 11 May 2015 | Amy Chozick

Posted on 05/11/2015 7:51:22 AM PDT by Theoria

Hillary Rodham Clinton calls them “everyday Americans.” Scott Walker prefers “hardworking taxpayers.” Rand Paul says he speaks for “people who work for the people who own businesses.” Bernie Sanders talks about “ordinary Americans.”

The once ubiquitous term “middle class” has gone conspicuously missing from the 2016 campaign trail, as candidates and their strategists grasp for new terms for an unsettled economic era. The phrase, long synonymous with the American dream, now evokes anxiety, an uncertain future and a lifestyle that is increasingly out of reach.

The move away from “middle class” is the rhetorical result of a critical shift: After three decades of income gains favoring the highest earners and job growth being concentrated at the bottom of the pay scale, the middle has for millions of families become a precarious place to be.

A social stratum that once signified a secure, aspirational lifestyle, with a house in the suburbs, children set to attend college, retirement savings in the bank and, maybe, an occasional trip to Disneyland now connotes fears about falling behind, sociologists, economists and political scientists say.

That unease spilled out during conversations with voters in focus groups convened by Democratic pollsters in recent months.

“The cultural consensus around what it mean to be ‘middle class’ — and that has very much been part of the national identity in the United States — is beginning to shift,’’ said Sarah Elwood, a professor at the University of Wisconsin and an author of a paper about class identity that one Clinton adviser had studied.

Rising costs mean many families whose incomes fall in the middle of the national distribution can no longer afford the trappings of what was once associated with a middle-class lifestyle. That has made the term, political scientists say, lose its resonance.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016election; economy; middleclass; waronmiddleclass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2015 7:51:23 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theoria

A middle class is an anachronism in a global economy. By and large it was enabled by manufacturing, and the manufacturing now resides in countries with a lower standard of living. So it goes.


2 posted on 05/11/2015 7:55:03 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Obama promised “Change”. Why would anyone be surprised that he delivered? Obama, Pelosi, and Reid killed the middle class, leaving us with the working poor, and the parasitic poor. Socialism never works.


3 posted on 05/11/2015 7:55:35 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

The middle class has been getting crushed for decades. It certainly didn’t start with Obama, nor did his policies help to turn the tide.


4 posted on 05/11/2015 7:58:18 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Truth be told, these people hated the Middle Class to begin with. Serfs are much easier to manage than independent people who can think critically.


5 posted on 05/11/2015 8:00:14 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
The original definition of the term "middle class", had nothing to do with statistical median income, or being a "white collar" worker.

Middle-class originally meant doctors, lawyers, small business owners -- people who worked for themselves and maintained a prosperous lifestyle between the working class and the landed aristocracy.

If you worked for a paycheck from somebody else, then you were "working class", even if you made a good salary.

6 posted on 05/11/2015 8:00:19 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

I’ve always been kind of fond of the Communist term, “workers”. Haven’t you, New York Times?


7 posted on 05/11/2015 8:01:23 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
“The cultural consensus around what it mean to be ‘middle class’ — and that has very much been part of the national identity in the United States — is beginning to shift,’’ said Sarah Elwood, a professor at the University of Wisconsin and an author of a paper about class identity that one Clinton adviser had studied.

Sarah Elwood? The missing Blues Sister?

8 posted on 05/11/2015 8:02:32 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Elitists and peasants. The peasants will one day cook the elitists over an open fire.


9 posted on 05/11/2015 8:04:46 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Civil rights are for civilized people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Not a good development.

This country has always managed to avoid the worst of Socialist excesses because a very wide swath of income ranges all regarded themselves as “middle class”.

If that is beginning to fracture it won’t be long till we turn into France.


10 posted on 05/11/2015 8:05:43 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
Oh but wait, according to the New York Times and their leftist ilk, the economy is booming since 0bama's coronation. How can this be?

On a related note, if you want to see a liberal jackass' head explode, the next time you hear one spouting off about "all the jobs created by 0bama", just ask him, why are interest rates still being kept artificially low, and why are we still printing money and monetizing our debt.

11 posted on 05/11/2015 8:08:59 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

.....And that time is coming for that “cooking” to take place.


12 posted on 05/11/2015 8:14:33 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
Four factors have contributed to the decline of the middle class: (1) the mass entry of women into the work force, which depressed wages, consolidated many well-paying jobs into fewer households, and created a need for expensive daycare; (2) globalization, which sent American jobs abroad; (3) massive illegal and legal immigration; and (4) strict land-use policies which discouraged new development and drove up the cost of housing.

People will dispute number one especially, and there may be a chicken-and-the-egg factor there, but it seems to me that the beginning of the decline of the middle class started right about when women started competing with men for jobs on an equal basis.

Since people tend to marry people of the same economic class, the inevitable result was that many households now "consumed" two good jobs, instead of one. Doctors would marry doctors, professors would marry professors, insurance agents would marry realtors, and so forth. So we have a shrinking middle class and a growing upper class and upper middle class.
13 posted on 05/11/2015 8:22:13 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Marxists have always hated the middle class, blaming it for preventing the glorious workers revolution they so feverently desire. Thus, Obama has done everything in his power to destroy it. We are seeing the results.


14 posted on 05/11/2015 8:23:12 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb
"all the jobs created by 0bama"

Correction: all the PART-TIME jobs created by Obama.
15 posted on 05/11/2015 8:23:48 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
"We have no collective language for talking about that condition [the lowering of expectations regarding the middle-class lifestyle],” Dr. Elwood said."

Yes we do, it's called "national decline."
16 posted on 05/11/2015 8:26:12 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
"Marxists have always hated the middle class, blaming it for preventing the glorious workers revolution they so feverently desire. Thus, Obama has done everything in his power to destroy it. We are seeing the results."

If you look at the membership of some of the major globalist organizations, you will see a strange combination of left-wing theorists, European and Middle-Eastern royalty, corporate founders and CEOs, and high-level media magnates.

This ruling elite has been steering the world towards an international proletariat since at least the 1960s, but you can be sure that they will do their best to preserve their own wealth. That is the bargain they've struck.
17 posted on 05/11/2015 8:31:21 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I think you are basically correct. Once people sought to enter the “middle class.” Now they are desperately clinging to it as it ebbs away from them. We are becoming a stratified country, 1% powerful ruling elite, the next 10% or 20% being an influential group of skilled worker drones who actually get the work done (the ancients called them “scribes”). Below them is the mass of peasants who live in ignorance and squalor. For the Romans, it was the “mob,” the indolent institutionalized urban poor who received their bread and circuses. Occasionally someone can cross the boundaries upward. But what we are now seeing is a massive downward migration out of the well-off worker drones and into the Black Hole of the mob, from which they and their offspring will not escape. And with EBT cards, 0bamaphones and “Dancing with the Stars” they won’t want to.

It has always been this way throughout the history of world civilizations. Rarely has more than 10% of a population been literate. It is still this way in China and India, despite their rising wealth.

I suppose we were something of an anomaly. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.


18 posted on 05/11/2015 8:33:36 AM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
This ruling elite has been steering the world towards an international proletariat since at least the 1960s

When you're outnumbered 6 or 7 billion to one, that can't end well.


19 posted on 05/11/2015 8:41:49 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Well said.


20 posted on 05/11/2015 8:52:03 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson