“I understand the ‘Black Lives Matter’ viewpoint because black lives do seem to be under a little bit more threat, and as a grandmother of a black grandson I am very conscientious of that,” said Torve.”
So it’s perfectly OK to make a statement like that and not be thought of as a racist. Nice double standard.
Double standards are standard fare for the left. But I’ll bet she will expect the ‘racist police’ to respond in an instant the next time a ‘brother’ snatches her purse in a public place.
The hypocrisy is nothing new.
Back in the late 60s, as a kid, I asked why no one had started up a National Association for the Advancement of White People. It was a legitimate question based in logic (maybe I read too much Heinlein).
The adults just laughed.
I still don’t see the difference.
That’s equality, right?
>>“I understand the ‘Black Lives Matter’ viewpoint because black lives do seem to be under a little bit more threat, and as a grandmother of a black grandson I am very conscientious of that,” said Torve.
It’s absolutely true, if you look at it statistically/actuarially.
It’s also true that the main danger for black men is other black men. This is the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about.
I was a poor white kid growing up in Brooklyn with a bunch of differen’t races and guess which race “as even children” far more violent and much more out of control?
That is why blacks are having more trouble, there is a lack of something at home. There seems to be a lack of self restraint, an often over developed ego and dangerous lack of respect for authority.
At the same time some of our smartest and highest achieving people have gotten there being brilliant and black without affirmative action; so what ever keeps them self limiting is the issue and not so much white people these days.