Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Sludge Hampers, Not Helps, Economy
Wall Street Journal ^ | May 10, 2015 | JUSTIN LAHART

Posted on 05/10/2015 12:09:44 PM PDT by thackney

The drop in oil prices was supposed to help the economy this year. So far, it seems to have mostly hurt.

The theory of why lower oil costs should boost U.S. growth is simple. Despite gains in domestic production from the shale boom, the country is a still a net importer of crude. So when oil prices fall, American consumers and businesses spend less money on stuff produced abroad, leaving them with more to spend on stuff produced at home. And gross domestic product goes up.

Yet GDP expanded at an annual rate of just 0.2% in the first quarter-a figure likely to be revised lower. And while some weakness was due to severe weather and West Coast port problems, growth this quarter is looking muted. Forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers expects GDP to grow at just a 2.2% rate.

That speaks to an underlying weakening of the economy driven at least partly by oil. GDP growth in the first quarter would have been three-quarters of a percentage point higher if it hadn’t been for a drop in private investment in nonresidential structures, which includes items like warehouses and power plants.

More than half that decline was due to a sharp falloff in spending on oil and gas wells and exploration. Investment in capital equipment was essentially flat in the first quarter, but would have risen absent a decline in purchases of mining and oilfield machinery. And those categories don’t capture lower spending from the oil industry on other equipment such as trucks and computers.

The dropoff in oil investment will continue to be felt in the current quarter: The U.S. rig count is down 15% from the end of the first quarter.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; energy; oil

1 posted on 05/10/2015 12:09:45 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

When you cut off all four legs off the frog and say jump, it doesn’t.
Conclusion: Frog is deaf!


2 posted on 05/10/2015 12:29:02 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (FReeeeepeesssssed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The real story is just how much the oil boom was carrying the overall economy.

It perfectly illustrates the absolute economic disaster of Obama’s polices on the overall economy.


3 posted on 05/10/2015 12:34:43 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

And yet, the recovery from shale reserves, coupled with the lower transportation costs to move to refineries and retail markets, makes the US-produced crude a sufficiently profitable enterprise to compete handily with most sources of imported crude.

Shifting from petroleum alone to natural gas utilization for industrial and transportation purposes also has a powerful effect on crude oil prices. I am entirely in favor of converting a LARGE part of road transportation from Diesel fuel or gasoline to Compressed Natural Gas, because of this steadily growing supply of NG production.

It works, it’s clean, and it’s available. And in the end, probably at net, less of a danger than either Diesel fuel or gasoline now is.


4 posted on 05/10/2015 12:35:32 PM PDT by alloysteel (It isn't science, it's law. Rational thought does not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

True.
Another way of looking at it is to disassociate by state/region. The truth is that most of the economic growth was going on in places like Texas, where high oil prices help the local economy much more than low gasoline prices.
These also happened to be places with a good business climate.
Lowering the price of gasoline is an incentive everywhere, but the business climate everywhere is not such that increased consumption is going to offset the hit in the areas set up to grow rapidly.


5 posted on 05/10/2015 12:51:48 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

NatGas for transportation fuel is a good thing for the US.

Just remember, we need the US government to remove needless regulations and restrictions, not subsidize with tax dollars.


6 posted on 05/10/2015 1:01:30 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Please show me an over the road tractor for heavy haul (105,500 lbs GVW) that actually functions out here (Pacific Northwest) in the mountains. Until then, not interested, sorry.

Until the torque ratings get up to the 1850-2000 lb/ft level, they’re just for in city use by little rigs.


7 posted on 05/10/2015 2:21:28 PM PDT by datura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

on Friday I went to Sam’s to buy diesel fuel for my van

the price of diesel was $2.34....... the price of regular gas was $2.34

parity at last


8 posted on 05/10/2015 2:26:54 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

Peterbuilt lists the Cummins ISX15 available as natgas but I don’t find the direct link to the specs.
http://www.peterbilt.com/products/alternative-fuels/386/#specifications

The ISX12 is under your specs, 400 hp - 1450 lb-ft.
http://www.cumminswestport.com/models/isx12-g


9 posted on 05/10/2015 2:39:18 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: datura

This was a few years ago:

PETERBILT RECEIVES ORDER FOR 200 LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS TRUCKS
http://www.peterbilt.com/about/media/2011/328/
Denton, TX (April 21, 2011)

Powered by the Westport GX engine, Peterbilt’s Model 367 LNG offers up to 475 horsepower and 1,750 ft-lbs of torque.


10 posted on 05/10/2015 2:41:58 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: datura

Looks like that 15 liter NatGas engine has proved too expensive to stay in the market. I kept searching and found:

Westport to End 15 ­Liter LNG Engine, Citing High Cost of Building Power Plant
http://www.ttnews.com/articles/printopt.aspx?storyid=33453


11 posted on 05/10/2015 2:52:26 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

So, a blip in the way the oil industry runs and corresponding lower gas prices “proves” that cheap energy is bad for the economy because the blip didn’t help. That smacks of the same “science” that the Global Warming nuts use - they look at a teeny slice of the whole and make their assertions from the minuscule anomaly that threw a few actors off their marks and cues.


12 posted on 05/11/2015 3:09:49 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

a blip?

Half of the drilling industry shut down is a blip?

Pathetic.


13 posted on 05/11/2015 5:18:35 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney
a blip? Half of the drilling industry shut down is a blip? Pathetic.

Missed the point - not a blip for the oil industry in general - a blip in the long term "status quo" of oil/gas prices when it comes to the author's determination that cheap energy is actually bad for the economy - nothing settled in long enough to make that determination.

Cute on the "pathetic" can't give you a "touche'" for it though - just a "nice knee-jerk-jump- the-gun try".

14 posted on 05/12/2015 3:18:20 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Missed the point - not a blip for the oil industry in general

You are missing the point. The Drilling and Exploration side is the one that has been spending the money in the US economy.

15 posted on 05/12/2015 4:00:58 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
The real story is just how much the oil boom was carrying the overall economy.

True statement, but I would add three points: (1) It takes time for the lower energy prices to ripple through the economy and have an effect. (2) For many Americans the lower gas prices simply took pressure off their budgets. The lower gas prices won't finance a new car or house. (3) Many American businesses are still holding back on expansion because they are uncertain how long the lower prices will last. They know Obama wants prices higher.

16 posted on 05/12/2015 4:35:52 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson