“Though the state votes first in the presidential primary, it has a mixed track record of supporting the candidate who ultimately becomes the nominee.”
We know this. But when has the media ever shrugged off the importance of Iowa, and why are they doing so now?
The reports I’m seening here on fr show that cruz is getting big support among the party activists—that is the people who will run his ground game in iowa.
it looks like bush will likely ignore places like iowa and south carolina where cruz is doing well among party activists. rather bush will go for the big vote primary states where his money could make the difference among turkey republicans.
I guess Spanish isn’t the first language in Iowa.
He’s getting torched? Allow me to light the next match!
The Burning Bush!
Jeb Bush murdered Terri Schiavo.
I guess Cruz is in 4th, since there's no mention of fourth place.
Walker, with 21%, was by far the leader in the poll. Rubio and Paul tied for second place with 13% apiece.
Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ted Cruz of Texas, Marco Rubio of Florida, and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee are tightly packed for second place, each earned between 13% and 11% support.There's a reason why Rove was at Huck's rally in Hope. Huck's a straw to split the Evangelical vote.
Why is it that all I hear from the MSM is that Jeb Bush is the most favored by the GOP?
In 2006 the top three states for farm subsidies were Texas, Iowa and Illinois.
Iowa polls going back for sometime have been Walker or Huckabee.
Iowa does not matter to anyone except the MSM.
It is not important. Just a wide spot in the road.
The MSM loves the Ad dollars they generate. That’s it folks!