Please Help To Keep The
"Conservative News and Views"
On FR Coming By "Clicking Here"!!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Posted on 04/28/2015 1:18:31 PM PDT by richardb72
This past Saturday Bloomberg’s Everytown representative, Ted Alcorn, insisted that he would not appear simultaneously with John Lott (the author of More Guns, Less Crime (University of Chicago Press) and the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center) on C-SPAN. Alcorn would only appear after Lott's segment was finished.
Here is John Lott's discussion of Bloomberg's gun control advocates unwillingness to ever debate
http://www.c-span.org/video/standalone/?c4535462
Here is Bloomberg’s Research Director’s explanation for why his organization won't ever debate.
http://www.c-span.org/video/standalone/?c4535518
Acorn's explanation for why Bloomberg's groups refuse to debate is pretty embarrassing. Hopefully, these clips will get a lot of attention and help show people how weak their arguments really are.
They are like Gorebull warming buttwads. They are right and have closed their ears and minds.
“To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”-George Mason. Given Mason’s comment, why would Bloomberg’s group want to debate, when their main philosophy is that citizens can not be trusted with firearms?
And notice that they want to FOLLOW Lot. I bet that they wouldn’t allow Lot to follow them.
I could only watch the wimpy metrosexual for about fifteen seconds.
Because they are incapable of facing the facts in a public forum.
They are quite happy to spew their lies, and have them spread by their media accomplices, unchallenged in front of MSM consumers.
Because he knows they’d (Pun) GET SHOT DOWN.(/Pun)
Reminds me of William F. Buckley Jr. when asked why Sen. Edward Kennedy would not appear on his show “Firing Line”:
“Why does baloney reject the grinder!?”
Anybody have a graphic of a gaydar meter going off scale?
LOL!
Uh...the way we determine whether you’re a credible scientist or research analyst is by first establishing that you agree with our preconceived notions.
Bttt.
5.56mm
“Bloomberg’s gun control research director explains why his group refuses to debate”
Uh, because the “science” is settled? No! Wait! It’s because 99.999% of “scientists” agree that ...
It’s really because they can’t defend their lies and misrepresentation ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.