Skip to comments.
Report: Only 6% Clinton Foundation Expenditures Go To Charity
Breitbart.com ^
| 27 April 2015
| Pam Key
Posted on 04/28/2015 7:28:00 AM PDT by Rockitz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
I think Slush Fund is the appropriate term. Hillary's political future just went into the toilet. She's toast.
1
posted on
04/28/2015 7:28:00 AM PDT
by
Rockitz
To: Rockitz
So where did the other 94% of the money go? Into Hillary’s pocket? Into Bill’s pocket?? Into Chelsea’s $10 million swank Manhattan condo???
To: Rockitz
From what we know of the money grubbing Clintons it’s amazing ANY money goes to real people in need.
3
posted on
04/28/2015 7:30:10 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(The thugs loot stores. The community leaders loot cities. - Daniel Greenfield)
To: Rockitz
and now we know why Chelsea, Huma and her little Weiner live in 10 million dollar condo’s
4
posted on
04/28/2015 7:30:10 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: Dilbert San Diego
“Most of their money goes towards salaries, bonuses, to close friends, folks tied to the Clinton campaign.”
5
posted on
04/28/2015 7:30:16 AM PDT
by
Rockitz
(This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: Rockitz
Report: Only 6% Clinton Foundation Expenditures Go To Charity And in other news...
6
posted on
04/28/2015 7:30:17 AM PDT
by
BerniesFriend
(Sarah Palin-"Lord knows she's attractive" says bitter Andrea Mitchell and the rest of the MSM)
To: Rockitz
But Hillary won’t go quietly.
Will we reach a point where leading Democrats have an intervention type meeting, and tell her it’s over???
All of this news is very bad news for HIllary, however, if nobody steps up to challenge her in the primaries, she will still get the Dem. nomination by default.
To: Dilbert San Diego
Salaries, travel, bonuses, overhead. Anywhere but charity.
8
posted on
04/28/2015 7:31:03 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
Maybe Chelsea’s nonhedge fund wannabe ski bunny hubby invested it
9
posted on
04/28/2015 7:31:24 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: Rockitz
And I'd guess since it's a charity, that $140 million was tax free, and tax deductible to those who donated.
When will Harry Reid proclaim that the Clintons don't pay taxes?
To: Dilbert San Diego
All of this news is very bad news for HIllary, however, if nobody steps up to challenge her in the primaries, she will still get the Dem. nomination by default.Dear God, make it so!
11
posted on
04/28/2015 7:33:30 AM PDT
by
Rockitz
(This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: Rockitz
It's a vacation/slush/retirement fund for the Clintons and a few hundred of their close ‘associates’...
I'm surprised the Clintons haven't hired Bernie Madoff to bamboozle stray suckers.
12
posted on
04/28/2015 7:33:35 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(The thugs loot stores. The community leaders loot cities. - Daniel Greenfield)
To: Rockitz
did the rest go to Bubba’s sex fund?
13
posted on
04/28/2015 7:34:41 AM PDT
by
max americana
(fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
To: Rockitz
As I understand it in order to maintain a ax exempt status a “Charitable Foundation” must distribute at least 15% of its assets each and every year to charitable works. The Klintons may be in even more trouble than expected.
14
posted on
04/28/2015 7:35:21 AM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Dilbert San Diego
So where did the other 94% of the money go?
To: max americana
it goes to salaries for the shadow clinton government that expects to hit the ground running in January 2017
16
posted on
04/28/2015 7:36:25 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
To: silverleaf
slightly off topic, but, if the evil 1% have stacked the deck and all that, as Hillary says, then how come liberals are allowed to benefit from that?? Why isn’t Hillary’s son in law called out as a member of the evil 1% hedge fund monsters???
To: Dilbert San Diego
They did NOT spend any on: Charm school, fat farms, decent plastic surgery, or attractive clothes.
To: Dilbert San Diego
How does 9 million dollars go to support the 400 million people the Clintons say they have helped? Especially when you take into consideration part of that 9 million went to whoever was administering the program in the local economy.
19
posted on
04/28/2015 7:40:03 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(two if by van, one if by broom)
To: max americana
did the rest go to Bubbas sex fund?
This touches on another potential Clinton scandal which the MSM hasn’t dug into yet, the issue of Bill going to that island full of teenage girls.
OMG, how will they justify charitable expenses there? Say that Bill was making charitable contributions to the girls welfare and all that??? Holy Toledo.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson