Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The incredible growth of the seemingly unstoppable government is driving me to the brink!
1 posted on 04/22/2015 8:47:43 AM PDT by Baynative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Baynative

This is actually an 80 year-old Roosevelt policy. These marketing orders exist for many agriculture commodities.

If Obama’s policies take 80 years to undo, then America is truly screwed.


2 posted on 04/22/2015 8:54:31 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

It’s for your own good.


3 posted on 04/22/2015 8:55:43 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Here’s my question. What are the plaintiff’s damages? If the market price, at time of consfication, was say, $7/ton, but the Gubmint thought it should be $14 a ton (because that’s what the USDA Chief’s brother wanted for his raisins) how much will the USDA be ordered to pay for the raisins they stole? Any bets? That’s assuming the plaintiffs win the case.


4 posted on 04/22/2015 9:07:05 AM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

According to Wikipedia:

“The Raisin Administrative Committee is based in Fresno, California and is overseen by the United States Department of Agriculture. Committee members are made up of industry representatives, who then decide what to do with the stockpiled supply. The profits from the raisins, often seized for no payment, are then used to pay the expenses of the committee or pay back farmers for their seized produce. In one recent year, $65,483,211 was made, although it was all spent, with none left over for farmers, according to the review of one recent year.[1]”

Sixty-five million dollars? Wanna know why the program is still in place?


5 posted on 04/22/2015 9:07:08 AM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Diagonally parked in a parallel universe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Just sour grapes.


6 posted on 04/22/2015 9:09:25 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Dang it...

Once again, this shows that I have an older version of the Constitution. Mine doesn’t list raisin control as one of the specific authorities given to the federal government.

Can someone point me to where I can download a latest version of the Constitution?

One that specifically authorizes (enumerates) federal government authority over such things as:
- the amount of water in my toilet bowl
- the type of light bulbs I use
- how fast ketchup should flow out of the bottle
- and also raisin control.


7 posted on 04/22/2015 9:14:52 AM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

They needed the raisins to give to the jihadis.............


8 posted on 04/22/2015 9:16:30 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Unconstitutional theft by government.

What else is new?


10 posted on 04/22/2015 9:23:06 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative
To create raisin scarcity, the government established a Raisin Administrative Committee that manages the supply of raisins through annual marketing orders. Raisin handlers must set aside a portion of their annual crop, which the feds may then give away, sell on the open market, or send overseas. Among the targets were Fresno, California raisin farmers Marvin and Laura Horne, who have been in the business for decades. In 2003-2004 the family farm was required to give some 30% of its raisin crop to the government—some 306 tons—without compensation. The previous year they had to hand over 47%, and they were paid less than the raisins cost to produce. The Hornes refused to participate...

Government control of the raisin market???


"They had better not bring back Prohibition!"

11 posted on 04/22/2015 9:26:04 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

Wickard v. Filburn. The worst trampling of individual rights in the history of the Supreme Court that few people have heard about.


14 posted on 04/22/2015 9:50:42 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CAluvdubya

Raisin ping


16 posted on 04/22/2015 10:27:11 AM PDT by Slyfox (If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

This is why the New Deal was a disaster.


19 posted on 04/22/2015 11:49:28 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson