Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assemblyman Demonstrates Roadside "Drug Breathalyzer"
NBC Bay Area ^ | 4/21

Posted on 04/21/2015 2:08:25 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Legislators and advocates gathered Monday to showcase a new tool that will crack down on drugged driving across the state.

DDS2, also known as a roadside drug test, is like a breathalyzer, but it tests for narcotics instead of alcohol.

The technology, in use in states such as Colorado and New Hampshire, will allow officers to find out in about a minute whether a driver is under the influence of drugs.

It uses saliva to test for six different drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, and meth. The demonstration came on April 20 the unofficial stoner holiday of 4/20.

California Assemblyman Tom Lackey, R-Palmdale, has proposed a bill that would allow all state law enforcement agencies to use this technology.

He said being able to efficiently test for drug use in drivers will cut down on the number of innocent people arrested and will help save lives.

"It's very, very disheartening when you go into the home of someone to share with them the absolute worst news possible, that their loved one has been stolen because of this decision making," he said. "And so when you experience that it changes you, it changes your perspective."

The DDS2 only tests for drug use within the past few hours.

Some critics say it might unfairly target people with legal prescriptions, such as those who take Adderall, which would show up on the test as an amphetamine.

Lackey doesn't know how much the technology would cost taxpayers, or which department would be responsible for funding it.

"This particular technology would have capture and give an indication of recency of use, which we currently do not have," Lackey said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: wod

1 posted on 04/21/2015 2:08:25 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; All
 photo CM54Marijuana-Not-Crack-Posters.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Fight !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 04/21/2015 2:11:33 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman

yeah doesn’t marijuana stay in your system for a long time. How is that going to work with the states that legalized it. Will there be a .08 test equivalent.


3 posted on 04/21/2015 2:16:32 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Oh Heck, here I thought the article would read,

Assemblyman tests roadside drug breathalizer...FAILS.


4 posted on 04/21/2015 2:19:09 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
doesn’t marijuana stay in your system for a long time.

The inactive metabolic byproducts are what's usually tested for - they can stay in the system for weeks. Active THC gets stored in fatty tissue (where it has no effect) and slowly leaches out.

How is that going to work with the states that legalized it.

I believe Colorado specifies a THC concentration limit.

5 posted on 04/21/2015 2:26:19 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

The metabolites do, the active ingredient does not.


6 posted on 04/21/2015 2:26:21 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“had a loved one stolen”? What does that mean?

Oh well. As long as it restricts Americans’ freedom, its all good.
Jack boot government thugs unite!


7 posted on 04/21/2015 2:28:49 PM PDT by subterfuge (Minneseeota: the laughingstock of the nation - for lots of reasons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Thanks guys for the two great answers. So which one is going to get tested? The active ingredient or the metabolic inactive ones? I guess the sugar stored from beer would be he equivalent of metabolic? I’m a little confused on this one?


8 posted on 04/21/2015 2:40:26 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If this is to test a person who has been pulled over for driving erratically, fine. If it’s one of the road-blocks where you are forced to submit with no visible sign of a problem, then not fine.


9 posted on 04/21/2015 2:44:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

A single joint will stay in your system about six hours. That is if you’re not a regular user.It does last in the blood though for weeks.


10 posted on 04/21/2015 3:03:48 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

WHAT stays in your blood though. That is the part that confuses me.


11 posted on 04/21/2015 3:05:42 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Agreed


12 posted on 04/21/2015 3:30:26 PM PDT by stillfree? (Tagline? We don't need no stinking taglines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
"such as those who take Adderall, which would show up on the test as an amphetamine"

Because Adderall is an amphetamine prescription drug. Not good stuff. It should be banned as a drug with any medical therapeutic value. Give anyone amphetamines twice daily and they will be very happy. For a while. Then things go to hell from there.

13 posted on 04/21/2015 3:55:19 PM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Lackey doesn’t know how much the technology would cost taxpayers, or which department would be responsible for funding it.

Who Cares, lets pay for it by deducting the amount out of PUBLIC SERVANTS Salaries


14 posted on 04/21/2015 4:25:35 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Just use the Slick Willy defense: I didn’t inhale.


15 posted on 04/21/2015 7:48:08 PM PDT by QT3.14 (Life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer you get to the end the faster it goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Just use the Slick Willy defense: I didn’t inhale.


16 posted on 04/21/2015 7:49:52 PM PDT by QT3.14 (Life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer you get to the end the faster it goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622; jmacusa; ConservingFreedom
WHAT stays in your blood though. That is the part that confuses me.

The confusion is not surprising, in fact, it's probably intentional.

At any rate, THC COOH (pronounced carboxy THC) is a metabolite of THC delta 9, the psychoactive cannabinoid in pot. THC delta 9 is commonly referred to as just THC, and the carboxy commonly referred to as THC COOH. The COOH metabolite (made by the body FROM the active THC) takes a few hours to become present and detectable. It is not psychoactive. It is the chemical that for years, and in employment and other contexts has been the subject of urine tests, and can be found for days, weeks, or even months. Being lipid (fat) soluble it is the THC COOH that is stored in the fat cells and hangs around for a long time. Since urine sampling and testing is cheap and simple, an employer can use it to fire someone, even though the smoking may have been only on Friday nights with no employment until Monday, and never within any possible impairing time of work.

17 posted on 04/21/2015 8:06:09 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Understood a little of that with my small brain, lol. Sounds like it could be trouble in the places where pot is legal.
18 posted on 04/21/2015 8:08:29 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson