Posted on 04/20/2015 2:09:22 PM PDT by VinL
Heres why if the Iowa caucuses were today he would win and you wouldnt... This memo amounts to an intervention.
It serves to warn all other Republican presidential campaigns of a perfect storm looming on the horizon. Not only does the storm favor Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, but your combined failures/refusals to recognize it are only helping him. If that environment persists, Mr. Cruz will not only win Iowa next year, but win it convincingly.
Your skepticism of Mr. Cruzs candidacy, and willingness to play ball with a system the average Iowa conservative no longer trusts, is helping to positively brand Mr. Cruz to voters looking for a fighter and an outsider.
And that is what the majority of 2016 Iowa Caucus voters are looking for.
Now before you (and your consultants) get defensive and immediately dismiss this memo as a ridiculous polemic written by a rube, please remember a few things.
My record predicting the outcome of elections in Iowa is proven. For this reason, many of your campaigns have already sought out my take on the lay of the land here. Several of you have already appeared on my radio show to speak to my audience. Some of your campaigns have even asked me for staffing referrals. And I just moderated the first joint candidate forum of the 2016 cycle in front of about a thousand Iowa Caucus voters/activists.
Given this track record, I hope youll each take this in the spirit it is intended. I know several of you personally, would be proud to vote for many of you, and am grateful to have such a strong field. Nonetheless, if the caucuses were today youd all be fighting for second behind Mr. Cruz.
While its definitely (snip)
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
That’s funny. Yesterday on the McLaughlin Group, many many republican candidates were mentioned and compared at length Bush, Linda graham, Paul, Rubio and others. They wee set up in detail against Hillary
All except Ted Cruz. Just not mentioned at all. Like he’s Ralph Nader or pat Buchanan.
Hmm. Dick Morris’s comes to mind
One good thing-with all the other “conservative” candidates blowing their “conservative” credentials so soon in the race for whatever stupid reason, the vote shouldn’t be so divided amongst conservatives this time. It’s really Cruz or no one, for a dyed-in-the-wool conservative.
FOX has done the same. they try to avoid Cruz because he is socially conservative unlike the others running thus far and the NY elitist and liberal-tarians at FOX can’t have their homosexual friends denied their agenda or their illegal workers for their yard sent home,
That is interesting. It’s like they know that Cruz is the one and only real choice for real conservatives, and they don’t want to see us coalesce around him and knock out the GOPe. They usually manage to divide us in the primaries, but all the others have shown the cracks in their conservative facades too soon.
2nd, in the 2012 cycle, I remember Napster being a respectful poster for the most part - I can’t believe he’s gone rogue.
-:)
That's pretty close to what we need - as many troops as it takes manning the border and turning back all illegals. If they want asylum, they can apply from home or from Mexico, but not from inside our country, not without entering legally. Those who overstay a legal entry should also be deported immediately, with any appeal processed after they are out of our country.
As for Oabamcare, if the Supremes do their job and overturn it, we need to make sure it isn't propped up by the RINO contingent. If the Supremes fail to defend the Constitution again, we need to make sure Obamacare is repealed and replaced in the first week of a real president's term (by "replaced", I mean replaced with free markets and pure freedom instead of big governmetn liberal mandates).
Cruz is the clear choice. It’s not even close. He’s a man among boys, as will be demonstrated during the debates.
Yes, but I want to hear it from someone who isn’t lying to me.
that button looks obamaesque
we’ve seen his symbol for years and it seems to reappear with the Cruz photo superimposed
Imus gutfeld and mcguirk loathe Cruz. What’re they going to do? Seems very unwise to me.
At least to say it on air, for the record. They’re out of touch
It was worth venturing to the website with AdBlock on guard. The major bullet points in the article are below to encourage others to take a look (hopefully this doesn't violate the FR excerpt policy):
1. Youre not entitled to anything.
2. Fighting for what we believe in is an accomplishment.
3. Conservatives want change agents, not managers.
4. Voters are looking to their futures, not your past.
5. People want to decide on a candidate early.
Lets not forget Stossell who I don’t watch no more repeating the same old story and lies while hiding their true agenda.
Then there is that Kennedy woman who needs to take the big glasses off because she is not that smart and the glasses don’t make her look bright or smart..
But, but, but Rand Paul is FORMITABLE I TELL YA !
So says some Rand Paul supporters in their delusional kookaid drunken stupor.
In reality Rand Paul smells of desperation like a guy being rejected by a woman multible times.
Naps is an "Anybody-but-Cruz-BOT".
All Ted Cruz fans: PLEASE Contact Ted Cruz and tell him to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, which would give President Obama nearly unstoppable power (Fast Track Authority) to negotiate a trade treaty to give Viet Nam, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru and the WTO authority over US immigration policy.
Yup, those two candates you have discribed are Rand Paul and Marco Rubio..
Ted Cruz is the ONLY choice among conservatives.
The rest are douche bag losers..
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.