Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Splits With Rubio, Cruz To Vote For Deficit-Exploding Healthcare Bill
Daily Caller ^ | RACHEL STOLTZFOOS

Posted on 04/15/2015 9:12:48 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

Republican Sen. Rand Paul split with senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio to vote for a healthcare bill Tuesday night that will add about half a trillion dollars to the national debt over the next several decades.

Paul sided with the overwhelming majority of senators and representatives who voted for the bill, in a decision almost certain to come up in the primary race, where he is currently joined by Cruz and Rubio.

The “doc-fix” bill solves a recurring problem in the way Medicare payments are made to doctors, extends a children’s health insurance program, and requires higher-income seniors to pay higher premiums, and is hailed by supporters as a rare example of meaningful compromise. (RELATED: McConnell’s Priorities: Balance Budget, Then Increase Deficit In Separate Bill)

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill will add $141 billion to the federal deficits over the next decade, and by 2035 it will add half a trillion dollars to the federal debt, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

President Obama applauded passage of the bill in a statement Tuesday, and said he will be “proud” to sign it into law. (RELATED: Senate Overwhelmingly Approves Medicare ‘Doc-Fix’ Bill)

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, who is also expected to run in 2016, voted with Paul for the bill.

Cruz and Rubio joined just six other Republican senators in voting against the bill: Mike Lee, Jeff Sessions, Richard Shelby, David Perdue, Ben Sasse and Tim Scott.

“While he’s supportive of parts of the bill, he was very concerned about the substantial unfunded cost and ultimately couldn’t vote for it,” an aide to Rubio told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The bill explicitly exempts itself from a rule known as PAYGO that requires Congress to “pay” for increased spending by finding cuts somewhere else.

Republican Sen. Mike Lee offered an amendment Tuesday that would strike the PAYGO exemption from the bill. Paul, Graham, Cruz and Rubio all voted for the amendment, but it was rejected.

Cruz released a statement Tuesday explaining his vote. “I cannot support the Boehner-Pelosi bill, which institutionalizes and expands Obamacare policies that harm patients and their doctors while adding roughly half a trillion dollars to our long-term debt within two decades,” he said.

“Any deal should be fully paid for and include significant and structural reforms to Medicare that provide seniors more power and control over their health care,” he added.

Paul was not immediately available for comment.

Follow Rachel on Twitter


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; US: Kentucky; US: Massachusetts; US: South Carolina; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; bensasse; biggovernment; cromnibus; cruz; davidperdue; deathpanels; docfix; doddfrank; election2016; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; florida; gopestablishment; jeffsessions; kentucky; lieawatha; lindagraham; lindseygraham; marcorubio; massachusetts; medicaid; medicare; mikelee; newbieatnumber30; obamacare; paul; paultard; paultardnoisemachine; paygo; randpaul; randpaulnoisemachine; randpaultruthfile; randsconcerntrolls; repealandreplace; richardshelby; rinos; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; rupaul; southcarolina; tedcruz; texas; timscott; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Kenny Bunk

I didn’t realize it was up to six years now, but I had noticed. It makes sense since Obama has been in for six years.

Once again, Republicans in Congress, why haven’t they come up with one?


41 posted on 04/18/2015 11:21:37 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Kenny Bunk

yes, yes, the “budget” question.

With no budget, spending goes into a “no budget” mode, which gives enough flexibility to the management hierarchy to keep the billions flowing to the various recipients in the current ratios, instead of getting into political tussles about changing the ratios.

More to EPA ? Less to road contractors ? More to DHS equipment contractors ? Less to TSA contractors ?

Governments love no budgets, no debate, keep it in backroom deals, make executive decisions, have committees decide, etc.

In NJ, “conservative Republican” Governor fatboy Christie happily signed into law a bill that says if local towns (over 500 towns in NJ) do not have to put their school budgets to a vote as long as the total increase in spending is 2% or less, and they’ll still get their share of state-level booty collected from taxpayers. Needless to say, the maximum flat 2% increase is all I’ve seen since. Avoids all that nasty public discourse. It’s for the kids ya know.


42 posted on 04/18/2015 5:41:17 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

One more reason Cristie Cream is a no go.


43 posted on 04/18/2015 6:01:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson