Skip to comments.
Puerto Ricans who can’t speak English qualify as disabled for Social Security
Washington Post ^
 | April 10 at 6:00 AM
 | Josh Hicks
Posted on 04/10/2015 10:47:23 AM PDT by rickyrikardo
Hundreds of Puerto Ricos residents qualified for federal disability benefits in recent years because they lacked fluency in English, according to government auditors. 
The Social Security Administrations inspector general questioned the policy this month in light of the fact that Spanish is the predominant language in the U.S. territory. 
Under Social Security regulations, individuals are considered less employable in the United States if they cant speak English, regardless of their work experience or level of education.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: disability; languagedisability; news; oig; puertoricans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21 next  last
    
To: rickyrikardo
To: rickyrikardo
    Am I the only one who is aware of the $210 trillion debt?
3
posted on 
04/10/2015 10:50:10 AM PDT
by 
fhayek
 
To: AngelesCrestHighway
    What about for those who can’t read or write cursive?
 
4
posted on 
04/10/2015 10:50:12 AM PDT
by 
dfwgator
 
To: rickyrikardo
    Much dumber than counting ketchup as a veggie
 
5
posted on 
04/10/2015 10:50:38 AM PDT
by 
GeronL
(CLEARLY CRUZ  2016)
 
To: rickyrikardo
    At the rate we’re going we can get disability for not speaking Spanish in a few years.
 
6
posted on 
04/10/2015 10:52:54 AM PDT
by 
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
 
To: fhayek
    Any mention of debt/deficit/etc in the MSM stopped in Jan 2009. Those words were joined by McJobs and homeless problem in the journ-0-list wastebasket.
 
7
posted on 
04/10/2015 10:53:02 AM PDT
by 
nascarnation
(Impeach, convict, deport)
 
To: rickyrikardo
    My sister took 3 years trying to get on disability for Scleroderma, which did eventually kill her. They fought her and fought her on it.
I’ve been told by a friend who worked for a lawyers office that drug addicts are never turned down for it.
 
8
posted on 
04/10/2015 10:54:36 AM PDT
by 
Beowulf9
 
To: rickyrikardo
    OPM — Other Peoples Money, so who cares. /sarc
9
posted on 
04/10/2015 10:57:22 AM PDT
by 
dhs12345
 
To: cripplecreek
10
posted on 
04/10/2015 10:57:31 AM PDT
by 
Milton Miteybad
(I am Jim Thompson.  {Really.})
 
To: nascarnation
    We encourage people not to learn English by all the bilingual nonsense that the taxpayer underwrites, then we pay these very same people because they didn’t learn English. WTF.
 
11
posted on 
04/10/2015 11:00:38 AM PDT
by 
fhayek
 
To: rickyrikardo
    “Everything must support the Democrat Party. Now, how can the Social Security Administration support the Party?”
“Comrade, we can support the Party by allowing our party members to receive disability for anything like, say, wearing a baby bonnet.”
“Good. Make it so, comrade.”
 
12
posted on 
04/10/2015 11:02:35 AM PDT
by 
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
 
To: rickyrikardo
    By this standard, millions of Mexicans and Chicanos throughout the are also “disabled” and eligible for benefits. Many of the former speak only Spanish, many of the latter speak in gibberish barrio Spanglish.
 
To: rickyrikardo
    How ‘bout us gringos who can’t sprechen da espanol?
 
14
posted on 
04/10/2015 11:27:25 AM PDT
by 
FlingWingFlyer
("I want to be America's first, historical, male first lady."  - Slick Willie)
 
To: AngelesCrestHighway
    Not good but at least they are American....that is what is surprising. You would think it would be for illegal aliens.
 
15
posted on 
04/10/2015 11:37:46 AM PDT
by 
napscoordinator
(Walker for President 2016.  The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!!  The rest...talkers!)
 
To: rickyrikardo
    Whee! Free money!
Er, I meant. ..
Whee! Dinero gratis!
 
To: rickyrikardo
    Direct link to the audit report
http://oig.ssa.gov/sites/default/files/audit/full/pdf/A-12-13-13062.pdf
check out page 9:
For instance, we reviewed a DDS case where a 50-year-old female claimant in Puerto Rico filed for disability in FY 2010. She had 2 years advanced education, previously worked as a dental assistant, and only spoke Spanish.
The claimant alleged disability based on depression and disorders of the back. Her doctor noted that, with her medical condition, she could perform light work.
Given these factors, as well as inability to communicate in English, the adjudicator was able to cite grid rule 202.09 (see Table 1) and determine the claimant was disabled. Had the claimant been able to communicate in English, grid rules 202.12 or 202.14 would most likely
have directed a determination of not disabled.
The gist of this is non-English speakers in Puerto Rico are getting SSDI because they are classified as illiterate under English-grid-rules.
My question is: Are US ‘citizens’ in the US getting SSDI under these same English-grid-rules, when, if they spoke English they wouldn’t qualify?
 
17
posted on 
04/10/2015 11:51:55 AM PDT
by 
libertarian27
(FR Cookbooks - On Profile Page)
 
To: rickyrikardo
    This should help you understand why they “need” to raise your eligibility age and implement means testing.
 
18
posted on 
04/10/2015 1:01:18 PM PDT
by 
utax
 
To: rickyrikardo; Joe Brower
    Can Americans who live in Miami qualify for benefits if they don't speak Spanish?!!???
To: rickyrikardo
    Gee I live in Houston, can I get it because I don’t speak Spanish?
 
20
posted on 
04/10/2015 2:21:09 PM PDT
by 
Lockbox
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson