Blocking the Path to 9-11
Posted on 04/10/2015 7:14:37 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
We will probably never know specifically what was on Hillary's email server (unless, as suggested by the Wall Street Journal, we subpoena China's military intelligence). But if the spell is finally and definitively broken, as the willingness of less-than-right-wing pundits at the New York Times, Time magazine and others to criticize Hillary without restraint suggests it might be, then we may yet learn many things about the world in which we live that we had no idea were being suppressed out of rapturous worship, or mortal terror, of the Clintons. We may emerge into a world of freedom and democracy that we had almost forgotten existed.
As just one example: Imagine for moment a world in which any of the movies Flight 93, World Trade Center, Zero Dark 30, or American Sniper had been produced but never screened in theaters, because some cabal of politicians had objected and seen to it that the film would be censored, censured, and suppressed.
Stop imagining. That is exactly what happened to the prime-time ABC miniseries 'The Path to 9/11'. This film is arguably the most significant of the post-9/11 set, as it connects the dots between the first World Trade Center attack of 1993, the failure to neutralize Osama Bin Laden despite multiple opportunities, and the ultimate tragedy of September 11, 2001.
Yet this 5-hour docudrama was aired only once in September 2006, with edits and cuts demanded by partisan censors, and then buried under orders of Robert Iger, president of the parent company, Disney. To this day it has not been released to the public on DVD. Why?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
WELCOME TO THE CLINTOON ZONE!
That’s why they invented Netflix!
The leftist media have made their selection for the next president and it is Hillary.
We are going to see a repeat of the media’s 2008 Slobbering Love Affair. Then the object of their obsession was Obama, but this time it is, and will be, Hillary.
They will continue to turn a blind eye to her sins, her criminality, incompetence and base duplicity just as they have been doing for her and Obama and other liberals for many years.
Suppress, deny, obfuscate, prevaricate, and intimidate.
When all that fails, then come clean. But only under threat of imprisonment. Then negotiate imprisonment down to house arrest, or “honor constraint”, no ankle bracelets.
Then skip out, because nobody is coming after you anyway.
Works for illegal aliens, doesn’t it?
Sounds like Rod Stoger annoncing for the Twigh-Light Zone.
Why China? I thought everything was on the big NSA computers in Utah.
Bill Clinton is on tape admitting that the government of the Sudan offered to hand over Osama Bin Laden while Clinton was President but he turned them down. If he had taken Bin Laden, 9/11 would never have happened. The Republicans have never made an issue of this. Imagine if the shoe had been on the other foot—if a Republican President had turned down the offer, it would be a better-known incident in American history than the assassination of JFK.
Another democrat with no records to run for office what could go wrong it’s ground hog again.
Hillary Clinton may well announce that she is running for President.
She will do it to cover up her money laundering operation. She got a lot of money from overthrowing the government of Libya, having Qadaffi killed and then taking his fortune. That’s too much money to hide. Hillary spends too much money on nice things.
So, she’ll say that her visible wealth is from campaign donations and speaking fees. I’m pretty sure she isn’t getting $300,000 speaking fees. She just convinces the organizations to say that and then gets way less money. She’s covering up her blood money.
Remember her cackling over Qadaffi’s death? That was the cackle of someone getting a lot of blood money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.