Skip to comments.Loretta Lynch's secret prosecutions 'allow criminals to walk' Obama AG pick leads nation in tactic
Posted on 04/07/2015 8:09:03 PM PDT by Nachum
NEW YORK Loretta Lynchs extensive use of secret dockets in the Eastern District of New York, which she oversees as U.S. attorney, is yet another issue some of her critics on the Senate Judiciary Committee are examining as they prepare to vote on her nomination to succeed Eric Holder as attorney general.
Federal prosecutors in Lynchs Brooklyn-based district have pursued secret unnamed John Doe or Jane Doe prosecutions 58 times since she became U.S. attorney in May 2010. None of the other federal district courts has charged more than eight Does during the same period of time, according to a probe by NBC News.
WND has investigated the case of a member of a prominent New York family with a history of Wall Street connections who has asked not to be named in this story for fear of reprisal.
Lynch demanded a guilty plea, threatening a criminal indictment, but has chosen not to prosecute. The unindicted figure, however, was confronted by a team of Department of Justice lawyers who demanded answers under oath to a long list of incriminating questions, and he is still the target of a secret investigation after two years.
Sidney Powell, who worked in the Department of Justice for a decade and was lead counsel in more than 500 federal appeals, has charged that Lynchs use of the secret docket has allowed admitted criminals to walk free, deprived their victims of millions of dollars of restitution required under the law, and enabled the criminals to commit more crimes against the unsuspecting public.
Writing in the New York Observer in January as Obama announced Lynchs nomination, Powell said courageous lawyers at the time were asking the U.S. Supreme Court to a review a case, Palmer v. John Doe, that would review what she called the unholy
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Flush her. Make H0lder hold on until the bitter end.
From what I know of this case, this summation is vastly overstated.
One of the guns in this scandal was used to kill a BP agent. No other connection.
Had this specific gun not been available, a different one would have been used.
Why not print this questionaire up encircle your answers and send it to your US Senator
INS...Amnesty.. Forget about Ebola
We dont allow cattle to enter without a background health and ancestry check which we also reqiure of legal immigrants who wait years and still go thru health and record checks. We also require that any legal immingrant demonstrate prior to entry that they offer a contribution to our society and not dependency upon it .
Yet were letting children and gang bangers in without doing any of this which has resulted in dispersing virulent new diseases (measles) and drug use which has resulted in unreported cases in schools where these illegal kids were placed.. Plus shoved a severe financial strain on local governments where they are placed .
Should any candidate for Attorney General supporting that practice be denied confirmation ?(Yes) (No) . Should the senate reject any such candidate to be Attorney General by applying the simple majority Reid rule citing the Hanen court injunction ruling that would restrict the use of the Reid rule only when such a ruling by a Judge were made ? (Yes) (No) (dont know what Reid rule means)
Should those given this bypassed favored treatment who miss their INS hearing be deported fortwith ? (Y) (N).. ? Denied re-entry (Y)(N) ? Snould that also apply to any illegal convicted of a felony (Y)(N)
In countries where an American citizen decides to be a legal emigree never mind being a seasonal visitor still are denied voting privledges. Own land in their own name. Face steep fines before getting kicked out let alone denied income and energy subsistance including food stamps, or bring in family members .
I (do) (dont) believe we should allow such full citizenship privledges mentioned above which are denied by the country of national origin of the above, to a legal American immigrant , deny such full citizen privledges to any (emigree) (seasonal vistor) (illegal) if their country does not allow those same privledges to any citizen of the United States, .
While such a position will be condemed as defacto deportation particularly by the political establishment .Would you continue to support a Senator who refuses to support such restrictions ? (Y) (N) Does that also include erecting border barriers such as fencing designed to discourage surrepticious or uncontolled entry ? (Yes) (No)
Should any American citizen which goes overseas to join a foreign entity fighting against the United States (such as ISIS) Be denied re-entry (Y)(N) and their citizenship revoked? (Y) (N) Should that person be charged with treason (Y)(N)
Very Truly Yours For Restoring the value of American citizenship and Conservative Government
Include your return address label below along with your signature and date
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.