Posted on 04/03/2015 10:21:05 PM PDT by Steelfish
Carly Fiorina is charging Apple CEO With Hypocrisy
Tim Cook with hypocrisy for voicing opposition to Indianas new religious liberty law while quietly doing business with countries with abysmal gay rights records.
The former Hewlett-Packard CEO, who is reportedly mulling a bid for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, took umbrage with Mr. Cooks op-ed earlier this week in which he referred to the passage of religious liberty laws as something very dangerous, which allows people to discriminate against their neighbors.
Former technology executive Carly Fiorina speaks during the Freedom Summit, in Des Moines, Iowa, on Jan. 24, 2015. (Associated Press) **FILE**
The news you want. The insight you need. $12 for 12 weeks. Subscribe today!
Shocking! The Government Does Not Want You To Know What We Discovered...
Franchise Gator lists all the available franchises in your area. Businesses starting at $10,000.
By Douglas Ernst - The Washington Times - Friday, April 3, 2015
Carly Fiorina is charging Apple CEO
Tim Cook with hypocrisy for voicing opposition to Indianas new religious liberty law while quietly doing business with countries with abysmal gay rights records.
The former Hewlett-Packard CEO, who is reportedly mulling a bid for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, took umbrage with Mr. Cooks op-ed earlier this week in which he referred to the passage of religious liberty laws as something very dangerous, which allows people to discriminate against their neighbors.
When Tim Cook is upset about all the places that he does business because of the way they treat gays and women, he needs to withdraw from 90 percent of the markets that hes in, including China and Saudi Arabia. But I dont hear him being upset about that, Mrs. Fiorina said, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday.
Read more: #ixzz3WJWKuZgu Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
And the liberal pretzel logic has them eating their own.
They’re all hypocrites. They just don’t know it yet.
Carly is right. Shout it from the highest rooftops. She is smart to show courage and clarity of purpose here. I think others will soon follow her lead.
You mean you’re not allowed to discriminate against your neighbor? They should be allowed to enter your house without permission?
Its should be their house, their rules. Tim wants it, their house, my rules
Underneath the external show of "sharia law", Saudi arabia is a gay paradise. The culture is thoroughly gay. All the women are kept tied up in bags while the men are busy drilling for oil if you know what I mean.
A conflicted libertarian.
One thing seems clear to me, that our present government is a lousy steward for marriage even if it were kept “non gay.” The question might be better removed from government than to be done wrong, and it definitely was being done wrong with easier and easier divorces and other marital immorality.
He is a corporate welfarist. He wants to interfere to prevent small businesses from competing.
Mark Steyn forcefully made the same point.
I would love all the red states to pass similar laws and not be intimidated by powerful Gays like the Apple CEO.
Then with over 30 states having such laws lets see how many righteous CEO’s want to lose operations in 3/5 th of the country.
I bet Apple’s CEO would face a shareholders fight.
Don’t tell Swordswallower!
>> Sorry, but Carly believes, and supports, Marriage Equality.
Good point. The radicals were never the problem — ground was lost by the likes of Carly. Nonetheless, when the salvos are firing the other way, I’m pleased to benefit from it.
I already posted it at 10AM, ASSHAT.
Is she right about the issue, or is she wrong?
The very substance of liberalism is power and control.
Why do you think leftards love commie figures like Stalin and Che?
This is true.
China have “gay marriage?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.