According to the left, a bill protecting people from discrimination and being forced to participate in a lifestyle they don't agree with is "discrimination." They believe you should be able to harass people out of existence for being people of faith - taking away their means of providing food and shelter for themselves and their families if you don't want to participate in their lifestyle - and not forcing them to do so is "discrimination". As the phrase goes: Liberal Logic 101: Yes, they are that stupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Republican Wildcat
He doesn’t want tolerance, he wants domination and control. How very authoritarian of him.
2 posted on
03/27/2015 8:28:29 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Republican Wildcat
Another fag speaks. I'm sure the majority of those living in Indiana wish queers would boycott their state.
3 posted on
03/27/2015 8:30:05 PM PDT by
doc1019
(Blue lives matter)
To: Republican Wildcat
Warp factor f*** off, Mr. Sulu.
4 posted on
03/27/2015 8:30:09 PM PDT by
Sicon
("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
To: Republican Wildcat
5 posted on
03/27/2015 8:30:36 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
To: Republican Wildcat
And all the gerbils in Indiana breathe a collective sigh of relief.
7 posted on
03/27/2015 8:33:21 PM PDT by
50mm
(Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
To: Republican Wildcat
Go to hell, Sulu, you fascist faggot.
At least some states are now fighting back scumbags like you, who are doing everything you can to attack, punish, bankrupt and potentially even jail Christians exercising their religious rights and freedoms.
Yes, die and go to hell, you Nazi pervert!
8 posted on
03/27/2015 8:33:22 PM PDT by
greene66
To: Republican Wildcat
The problem with boycotting Indiana, if one were inclined (I’m not), is that there is absolutely nothing there to boycott. I spent 20 years in Indiana one summer. There is no more boring state in the entire union. If you carved the entire state out of the nation and dropped it in the Pacific, it would be months before anyone would notice it was gone.
9 posted on
03/27/2015 8:34:07 PM PDT by
Ronin
(Dumb, dependent and Democrat is no way to go through life - Rep. L. Gohmert, Tex)
To: Republican Wildcat
I’ve boycotted that faggotty pervert Takei for over ten years now. It’s only fair.
10 posted on
03/27/2015 8:35:24 PM PDT by
MarineBrat
(Better dead than red!)
To: Republican Wildcat
So I can walk into a halal or kosher butcher and demand bacon? I don’t think so.
11 posted on
03/27/2015 8:43:19 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
To: Republican Wildcat
How can these hypocrite performers boycott ?
They content you must provide services if someone wants to hire you
If a Christian singer is required to preform at a gay wedding even though she objected to it
How are performers/ actors like Takei not required to preform in Indiana if some one wants to hire Takei even though he objects?
16 posted on
03/27/2015 8:59:37 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
To: Republican Wildcat
If this guy had been in music, he would have been known as a one hit wonder. Lighten up Georgie. You aren’t all that important.
19 posted on
03/27/2015 9:04:39 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
("I want to be America's first, historical, male first lady." - Slick Willie)
To: Republican Wildcat
So Democrats, hollywood liberals, homosexuals, and Black rappers all refuse to go to Indiana now?
Cool.....can we pass this in Ohio too?
20 posted on
03/27/2015 9:06:33 PM PDT by
Crim
(Palin / West '16)
To: Republican Wildcat
This faggot already had his time in the spotlight 40 years ago. Isn;t there any child he can rape and molest?
22 posted on
03/27/2015 9:10:03 PM PDT by
max americana
(fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
To: Republican Wildcat
...boycotting for tolerance is hypocritical in my opinion.
23 posted on
03/27/2015 9:12:36 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
To: Republican Wildcat
25 posted on
03/27/2015 9:23:30 PM PDT by
Bratch
To: Republican Wildcat
I read he's been invited by the Indy 500 to sing 'Back homo again in Indiana'.
(I'm here all week!)
26 posted on
03/27/2015 9:23:58 PM PDT by
Ken H
To: Republican Wildcat
Further proof they don’t give a damn about the Constitution, freedoms, religion, tolerance or freedom of assocation/choice. They want to force their view of everything on everyone, no matter how wrong or hypocritical.
It was a mistake to ever pass “gay rights” in the first place. A lifestyle choice is something they should have to live with. Leave the rest of us out of it.
27 posted on
03/27/2015 9:40:51 PM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
(MIley, you ignorant slut. The First Amendment applies to EVERYONE)
To: Republican Wildcat
I'm guessing that Indiana has maybe 2 or 3 million people between the ages of 15 and 100. Taking the low figure, assume that 2 million people engage in an average of 100 business transactions a year, for a total of 200 million transactions a year. How many will be affected by this law? 50? 100? 200? 500? Probably no more than that.
There will be a few Christian bakers/photographers/florists who will decline to service gay marriages, and there MIGHT be a handful of bed-and-breakfast owners who refuse service to gays. Apart from that, who will refuse service to gays? So this law will have an almost invisible impact on society. And yet opponents act as if the sky is falling.
To: Republican Wildcat
As a result of this law, who will refuse service to gays?
Public utilities? No.
Banks? No.
Grocery stores? No.
Gas stations? No.
Insurance companies? No.
Major hotels? No.
Restaurants? No.
Plumbers? No.
Electricians? No.
Auto repair companies? No.
Accountants? No.
Florists/Photographers/Bakers? Very few.
Bed-and-breakfast owners? Maybe a couple.
Realtors? Maybe one or two.
National chains in any field of business? No.
So the real-life impact of this law on gays will be almost negligible. Preserving the right of religious conscience is a reasonable trade off for a NEGLIGIBLE impact on gays.
To: Republican Wildcat
31 posted on
03/27/2015 10:16:51 PM PDT by
publius911
(If you like Obamacare, You'll LOVE ObamaWeb.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson