Posted on 03/26/2015 1:16:00 PM PDT by Kaslin
Tom Cotton is a patriot.
Lurch is a damn Yankee
The Difference Between Tom Cotton and John Kerry...One fought in Iraq, and one has a lucky hat.
Kerry has a history of sedition and treason. Cotton does not.
Kerry has like 70 purple hearts he sought to award himself?
Wasn’t Sec. Kerry in Vietnam?
Kerry has been committing sedition and treason longer than Sen. Cotton has been alive.
Dunno. All dolichocephalics look alike to me.
Yes, he was negotiating with the North Vietnamese.(Actually in Paris if I remember correctly.)
The difference between them is that one’s a lying turncoat and the other’s Tom Cotton.
The Difference Between Tom Cotton and John Kerry...One fought in Iraq, and one shot himself in the foot in Vietnam...
Kerry’s upset.
Cotton deserves all praise for that alone.
That too! :)
But-but-but isn’t sedition and treason just the way in which Democrats express their patriotism?
Jean-Francois Kerre`, God bless him, just marches to a different drummer.
Opportunist, prevaricator, and charlatan all in one, but in some strangely distorted way, he remains ever true to that core center.
And now he is negotiating with the Iranians. On behalf of the Iranians.
Isn’t it TRUE that a binding TREATY with the U. S. requires the CONSENT of the U. S. Senate?
Of course!
But, apparently, the Iranians didn’t KNOW that, because Kerry didn’t tell them. Tsk! Tsk!
Gee! How EMBARRASSING it must be for Kerry to be caught in another lie. Maybe that explains his hissy-fit.
So what?
Doesn’t Kerry’s snake-like tongue-in-tongue-out nervous habit pretty much PROVE that Kerry lies whenever he speaks.
Tom Cotton went to the Senate to be a Senator and do the will of those who sent him there. kerry went to the senate to be a politician and do the will of the party as well as attend the cocktail parties. POJK
You do.
American Patriots Against John KerryThe 1970 meeting that John Kerry conducted with North Vietnamese communists violated U.S. law, according to an author and researcher who has studied the issue.
Kerry met with representatives from “both delegations” of the Vietnamese (North Vietnamese and Viet Cong) in Paris in 1970, according to Kerry’s own testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971. But Kerry’s meetings with the Vietnamese delegations were in direct violation of laws forbidding private citizens from negotiating with foreign powers, according to researcher and author Jerry Corsi, who began studying the anti-war movement in the early 1970s.
According to Corsi, Kerry violated U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953. “A U.S. citizen cannot go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power,” Corsi told CNSNews.com.
By Kerry’s own admission, he met in 1970 with delegations from the North Vietnamese communist government and discussed how the Vietnam Warshould be stopped.
The nation that doesn't hang its traitors ends up putting them in office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
