Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nine Obamacare takeover elements at stake in King v. Burwell
The Hill ^ | 3-9-15 | Twila Brase

Posted on 03/25/2015 7:34:19 PM PDT by TurboZamboni

As the Supreme Court considers oral arguments in the King v. Burwell Obamacare subsidy case, the media is awash in claims that a King win will be a political disaster, forcing Republicans to save the illegal Obamacare subsidies issued in the 37 states without a state-based exchange. But the real disaster is the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the dangers the federal takeover of healthcare poses for patients, doctors, pocketbooks and health freedom. These very real dangers include: Socializing Medicine – The ACA sets up Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to nationalize the delivery of medical care. ACOs, sometimes called “HMOs on steroids,” meld physicians and hospitals into a single unit. Under annual capped government payments to ACOs for the care of “populations,” physicians and hospitals essentially become “insurers,” at risk for the cost of care – and patients become financial threats to the ACO’s bottom line. Federalizing Coverage – Obamacare’s national Exchange system was established to eliminate private insurance and expand government coverage. Everyone seeking coverage on an Exchange applies to the federal government for coverage. If the ACA is not repealed, the national Exchange system will become the nation’s only source of coverage. Expanding Dependency – After outlawing many affordable private health insurance policies, Obamacare increased the cost of coverage and forced many Americans onto the government Exchange to get less affordable coverage limited and subsidized by the government. .

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: burwell; kingvburwell; obama; obamacare; scotus; socialism; takeover; unconstitutional

1 posted on 03/25/2015 7:34:19 PM PDT by TurboZamboni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Socializing Medicine – The ACA sets up Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to nationalize the delivery of medical care. ACOs, sometimes called “HMOs on steroids,” meld physicians and hospitals into a single unit. Under annual capped government payments to ACOs for the care of “populations,” physicians and hospitals essentially become “insurers,” at risk for the cost of care – and patients become financial threats to the ACO’s bottom line.

Federalizing Coverage – Obamacare’s national Exchange system was established to eliminate private insurance and expand government coverage. Everyone seeking coverage on an Exchange applies to the federal government for coverage. If the ACA is not repealed, the national Exchange system will become the nation’s only source of coverage.

Expanding Dependency – After outlawing many affordable private health insurance policies, Obamacare increased the cost of coverage and forced many Americans onto the government Exchange to get less affordable coverage limited and subsidized by the government.

Ending Employer-Based Insurance – Beginning in 2018, premium costs that exceed $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families will be taxed at 40 percent. The thresholds for this ACA “Cadillac Tax” are indexed, capturing more employers each year and eliminating the tax advantage of employer-sponsored insurance. Over time, employers will drop coverage and employees will be forced into the Exchange and into Obamacare.

Caring for the Healthy, Not the Sick – The ACA focuses on prevention and “populations,” not patients. This switch changes how doctors are paid and patients are viewed. David B. Nash, M.D., dean of the Jefferson School of Population Health in Philadelphia told NJ.com that population health “realigns the incentives for the health system to care about health instead of sickness.” He calls it a “completely different focus.” Indeed. This focus means fewer dollars to care for actual patients.

Implementing a Massive Redistribution Scheme – Under the Obamacare Risk Adjustment program, premium dollars from health plans with lower-risk populations are sent to health plans with higher-risk populations. The most data-savvy health plans will profit mightily by making their enrollees’ “individualized risk scores” look the worst.

Paying Physicians for “Value” – Electronic reporting requirements, Obama’s 2009 mandate for interoperable electronic health records (EHRs) and the ACA’s “value-based purchasing” initiative will end physician autonomy. Doctors will be increasingly paid for “value,” not for actual services given. “Value” is determined by outsiders analyzing EHR patient data and may mean complying with one-size-fits-all treatment protocols or agreeing to participate in ethically-challenged “team-based care.”

Replacing Physicians With Teams – The ACA creates incentives for “team-based care” in “medical homes.” The Annals of Family Medicine claims a shortage of primary care doctors “requires the replacement of physician-only care with team-based care.” It suggests creating “standing orders that empower nonclinicians to share the care.” Thus, clinic staff would follow computer-based treatment protocols leaving patients at the mercy of non-physicians — and in the dark about who’s actually responsible for their care.

Ending Insurance – The ACA eliminated health insurance, outlawing catastrophic coverage for most people and mandating that health plans cover people with pre-existing conditions. This is not health insurance. Insurance protects against the financial threat of chronic, serious or life-threatening conditions the enrollee does not yet have. But the ACA forces health plans to cover people with these medical conditions at no extra cost to these individuals. Thus, the ACA replaces insurance with mandatory third-party financing of medical expenses and higher premiums for all.

King vs. Burwell could shut down Obamacare. If King wins, Republicans should not try to save the subsidies. They should herald the win as a mighty strike against the federal takeover of health care, and they should loudly proclaim that millions of employers and individuals in 37 states have been justly saved from Obamacare’s onerous mandates and penalties. Short of a repeal, this is the best ‘save’ of all.


2 posted on 03/25/2015 8:23:31 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
ACOs, sometimes called “HMOs on steroids,” meld physicians and hospitals into a single unit.

For which Kaiser Permanente is probably the model.

3 posted on 03/25/2015 8:31:38 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by government regulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
What would Obama’s response to a King win be???

Right now, interesting to contemplate!

Any idea when this verdict might be rendered? Just curious...

CA....

4 posted on 03/25/2015 10:42:14 PM PDT by Chances Are (Seems I've found that silly grin again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chances Are

The verdict is to be rendered in June some time. Michael F. Cannon with the Cato Institute has been doing a lot of writing on this case and I follow him on twitter. He is great in his writings on Obamacare.


5 posted on 03/26/2015 2:37:43 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather (Congratulations Bibi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I believe it was Ben Sasse talking to Mark Levin a few weeks ago who said there would be a winding down of the subsidies of about 18 mos. to transition the people out of the subsidies if the administration loses this case. He said the administration plans to put pressure on the Republican govs. to help all those people who had subsidies if they lose this case and they cannot afford to be put in that position.


6 posted on 03/26/2015 3:08:01 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather (Congratulations Bibi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
A great column.

Obamacare is an outrage. It is the Rats’ Enabling Act. Obamacare is the vessel of the police state.

7 posted on 03/26/2015 4:37:12 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chances Are

temper tantrum.

no idea.


8 posted on 03/26/2015 5:39:55 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

It all is. Every executive agency is a petty tyranny.


9 posted on 03/26/2015 5:43:43 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

OMG! Every item here ought to scare the Dickens out of Americans. Health professionals are going to get their pay lowered, their work load increased and the Fed-Gov as the new boss.


10 posted on 03/26/2015 8:55:56 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (American Jobs for American Workers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson