Posted on 03/25/2015 7:34:19 PM PDT by TurboZamboni
As the Supreme Court considers oral arguments in the King v. Burwell Obamacare subsidy case, the media is awash in claims that a King win will be a political disaster, forcing Republicans to save the illegal Obamacare subsidies issued in the 37 states without a state-based exchange. But the real disaster is the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the dangers the federal takeover of healthcare poses for patients, doctors, pocketbooks and health freedom. These very real dangers include: Socializing Medicine The ACA sets up Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to nationalize the delivery of medical care. ACOs, sometimes called HMOs on steroids, meld physicians and hospitals into a single unit. Under annual capped government payments to ACOs for the care of populations, physicians and hospitals essentially become insurers, at risk for the cost of care and patients become financial threats to the ACOs bottom line. Federalizing Coverage Obamacares national Exchange system was established to eliminate private insurance and expand government coverage. Everyone seeking coverage on an Exchange applies to the federal government for coverage. If the ACA is not repealed, the national Exchange system will become the nations only source of coverage. Expanding Dependency After outlawing many affordable private health insurance policies, Obamacare increased the cost of coverage and forced many Americans onto the government Exchange to get less affordable coverage limited and subsidized by the government. .
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Socializing Medicine The ACA sets up Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to nationalize the delivery of medical care. ACOs, sometimes called HMOs on steroids, meld physicians and hospitals into a single unit. Under annual capped government payments to ACOs for the care of populations, physicians and hospitals essentially become insurers, at risk for the cost of care and patients become financial threats to the ACOs bottom line.
Federalizing Coverage Obamacares national Exchange system was established to eliminate private insurance and expand government coverage. Everyone seeking coverage on an Exchange applies to the federal government for coverage. If the ACA is not repealed, the national Exchange system will become the nations only source of coverage.
Expanding Dependency After outlawing many affordable private health insurance policies, Obamacare increased the cost of coverage and forced many Americans onto the government Exchange to get less affordable coverage limited and subsidized by the government.
Ending Employer-Based Insurance Beginning in 2018, premium costs that exceed $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families will be taxed at 40 percent. The thresholds for this ACA Cadillac Tax are indexed, capturing more employers each year and eliminating the tax advantage of employer-sponsored insurance. Over time, employers will drop coverage and employees will be forced into the Exchange and into Obamacare.
Caring for the Healthy, Not the Sick The ACA focuses on prevention and populations, not patients. This switch changes how doctors are paid and patients are viewed. David B. Nash, M.D., dean of the Jefferson School of Population Health in Philadelphia told NJ.com that population health realigns the incentives for the health system to care about health instead of sickness. He calls it a completely different focus. Indeed. This focus means fewer dollars to care for actual patients.
Implementing a Massive Redistribution Scheme Under the Obamacare Risk Adjustment program, premium dollars from health plans with lower-risk populations are sent to health plans with higher-risk populations. The most data-savvy health plans will profit mightily by making their enrollees individualized risk scores look the worst.
Paying Physicians for Value Electronic reporting requirements, Obamas 2009 mandate for interoperable electronic health records (EHRs) and the ACAs value-based purchasing initiative will end physician autonomy. Doctors will be increasingly paid for value, not for actual services given. Value is determined by outsiders analyzing EHR patient data and may mean complying with one-size-fits-all treatment protocols or agreeing to participate in ethically-challenged team-based care.
Replacing Physicians With Teams The ACA creates incentives for team-based care in medical homes. The Annals of Family Medicine claims a shortage of primary care doctors requires the replacement of physician-only care with team-based care. It suggests creating standing orders that empower nonclinicians to share the care. Thus, clinic staff would follow computer-based treatment protocols leaving patients at the mercy of non-physicians and in the dark about whos actually responsible for their care.
Ending Insurance The ACA eliminated health insurance, outlawing catastrophic coverage for most people and mandating that health plans cover people with pre-existing conditions. This is not health insurance. Insurance protects against the financial threat of chronic, serious or life-threatening conditions the enrollee does not yet have. But the ACA forces health plans to cover people with these medical conditions at no extra cost to these individuals. Thus, the ACA replaces insurance with mandatory third-party financing of medical expenses and higher premiums for all.
King vs. Burwell could shut down Obamacare. If King wins, Republicans should not try to save the subsidies. They should herald the win as a mighty strike against the federal takeover of health care, and they should loudly proclaim that millions of employers and individuals in 37 states have been justly saved from Obamacares onerous mandates and penalties. Short of a repeal, this is the best save of all.
For which Kaiser Permanente is probably the model.
Right now, interesting to contemplate!
Any idea when this verdict might be rendered? Just curious...
CA....
The verdict is to be rendered in June some time. Michael F. Cannon with the Cato Institute has been doing a lot of writing on this case and I follow him on twitter. He is great in his writings on Obamacare.
I believe it was Ben Sasse talking to Mark Levin a few weeks ago who said there would be a winding down of the subsidies of about 18 mos. to transition the people out of the subsidies if the administration loses this case. He said the administration plans to put pressure on the Republican govs. to help all those people who had subsidies if they lose this case and they cannot afford to be put in that position.
Obamacare is an outrage. It is the Rats’ Enabling Act. Obamacare is the vessel of the police state.
temper tantrum.
no idea.
It all is. Every executive agency is a petty tyranny.
OMG! Every item here ought to scare the Dickens out of Americans. Health professionals are going to get their pay lowered, their work load increased and the Fed-Gov as the new boss.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.