Now just where did we hear those words before? "Read my lips, NO NEW TAXES"
To: bestintxas
RE :”
Jindals solution: eliminating $526 million in tax rebates, most notably for the states business inventory tax. Norquists group blessed the decision, concluding that ending tax rebates would not amount to a tax increase. But that distinction has prompted ridicule from state lawmakers and political commentators on both the right and the left, who accuse Jindal of selling out the states tax policy to Norquist. “ Is that what they are calling a tax increase?
What type of ‘rebates’?
2 posted on
03/24/2015 7:22:05 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: bestintxas
I’m not sure which is worse. Raising taxes after you said you would not.
Or consulting with Grover Norquist.
3 posted on
03/24/2015 7:25:29 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility.)
To: bestintxas
Jindal’s a loon. Any chance of a real (and smart) Conservative in there?
To: bestintxas
Louisiana state government is really a very different animal, and I don't think you realize how different until you've seen it from the inside.
I like Bobby Jindal as a person, and I generally agree with his political messaging. The actions of his administration, unfortunately, have not always been in line with that political message. He has sought to govern as a conservative, but that conservative vision has not always been put into practice. And the state has suffered for it.
But I'm not prepared to lay all of the blame for that at Jindal's feet. Some, but not all. There are forces close to Jindal working against his conservative philosophy that he has, in the past, acquiesced to for one reason or another.
Also, he made an enemy of the Obama administration pretty early on, and that has had a significant negative impact on the state as well.
Jindal, as a person and a conservative, would make a great president. Unfortunately, I don't think he'd be able to extricate himself from the forces with their own agenda currently in his administration. In fact, I fear he may be more susceptible to that kind of manipulation once in D.C.
With all that said, I'd still vote for him for president in a heartbeat because he's better than any Democrat out there and several of the current Republican candidates.
8 posted on
03/24/2015 7:38:33 AM PDT by
caligatrux
(Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson