Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I am a Climate Change Skeptic [Human Emissions Saved Planet]
heartland.org ^ | March 20, 2015 | Patrick Moore

Posted on 03/20/2015 8:46:38 PM PDT by grundle

Editor’s Note: Patrick Moore, Ph.D., has been a leader in international environmentalism for more than 40 years. He cofounded Greenpeace...

Human Emissions Saved Planet

Over the past 150 million years, carbon dioxide had been drawn down steadily (by plants) from about 3,000 parts per million to about 280 parts per million before the Industrial Revolution. If this trend continued, the carbon dioxide level would have become too low to support life on Earth. Human fossil fuel use and clearing land for crops have boosted carbon dioxide from its lowest level in the history of the Earth back to 400 parts per million today.

At 400 parts per million, all our food crops, forests, and natural ecosystems are still on a starvation diet for carbon dioxide. The optimum level of carbon dioxide for plant growth, given enough water and nutrients, is about 1,500 parts per million, nearly four times higher than today. Greenhouse growers inject carbon-dioxide to increase yields. Farms and forests will produce more if carbon-dioxide keeps rising.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.heartland.org ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: agw; climatechange; co2; environment; environmentalism; fertilizer; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenpeace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2015 8:46:38 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

Save The Earth Eat Burritos!!


2 posted on 03/20/2015 8:47:40 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I heart CO2 at less than 2%.


3 posted on 03/20/2015 8:48:13 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Patrick Moore? That’s going to leave a mark on Bill Nye.


4 posted on 03/20/2015 8:53:24 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

Actually that woul create methane,not carbon dioxide.


5 posted on 03/20/2015 8:57:16 PM PDT by BigEdLB (We're experienceing the rule of a Roman Emperor, Barack I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

The Erf is, like, Doooomed...


6 posted on 03/20/2015 8:58:30 PM PDT by PROCON (Always Give 100% --- Unless you're donating blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

“Actually that woul create methane,not carbon dioxide.”

The methane cycle is a sub-cycle of the carbon cycle.


7 posted on 03/20/2015 8:59:06 PM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

Had 4 Bean Burritos for Supper


8 posted on 03/20/2015 8:59:11 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I believe in blue skies and changing climate. My climate changes 6 times daily. None of it is man made. There is no global warming. The Arctic is frozen solid. The whole thing is a consummate hoax to take your stuff and give it to poor people who don’t work like you do.


9 posted on 03/20/2015 9:04:31 PM PDT by iowacornman (republicrats suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

Not if you light them


10 posted on 03/20/2015 9:05:15 PM PDT by xander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This concept is nothing new. I believe that, in my profile, I have a link to an article about CO2 that was written several years ago.

Plants need CO2, and, in turn, convert it to forms of carbon useable to other life. They need a certain concentration in order to be able to extract it from the air. Below that concentration, they can’t extract it, so they die.

For a while, it will seem like CO2 stays constant in the air since each time a plant dies and decays, its carbon is released back into the air as CO2. But, eventually, with the carbon sequestration schemes that global warming fanatics keep hatching up, the quantity of plant life will dwindle, and the overall biomass that the planet can support will shrink.

As things are going, life will end on earth not because of some disaster or because the sun runs out of fuel. Rather, life will go extinct long before then because the CO2 will have run out.

The quantity of CO2 in the air has steadily decreased throughout the existence of life on earth. I do not know if anyone knows exactly why that is.

Every time I see someone trying to raise a panic about CO2, I want to scream. We need it—it is absolutely necessary for life. Quit plotting to remove it from the air, you global warming fear mongers, you’re going to kill us!


11 posted on 03/20/2015 9:05:22 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

What percentage of scientists agree with this logic? Did they publish that? I mean, this is science after all. When are they going to poll the “scientists”?

(sarcasm)


12 posted on 03/20/2015 9:08:46 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (POPOF. President Of Pants On Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
He finally saw the light, rather carbon dioxide.
13 posted on 03/20/2015 9:09:41 PM PDT by Fungi (Evolution: no science, no truth, no nothing. Full of faith, faith in the "god" of chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowacornman

It’s amazing to watch people’s faces when you explain or remind them about a few things:

1) The volume of the sun is about 1,300,000 times that of earth.

2) The sun is an ongoing violent nuclear reaction. It is not a light bulb - incandescent, CF or otherwise - that puts out constant energy levels.

3) The earth is 2/3 water i.e. deep oceans

The idea that human activity on any scale is a significant driver of atmospheric change given the simple facts above is either simple hubris or the usual power grab or both.

Far too many of these ‘movements’ are comprised of vain fools seeking a simple means of flattering themselves, especially when they know their science knowledge is lacking and wish to conceal that fact.


14 posted on 03/20/2015 9:11:34 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Follow the link and read the whole article, worth it. I agree with Green Peace!


15 posted on 03/20/2015 9:15:23 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This article is awesome. But I still want to pay the tax.

Because I am hot blooded, I got a fever of a hundred and 3.


16 posted on 03/20/2015 9:25:39 PM PDT by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele

The earth isn’t 2/3 water - deep oceans or not.

The earth’s surface is 2/3 water.


17 posted on 03/20/2015 9:41:44 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rey
CH3 is an even stronger greenhouse gas! Also, get CFCs while you still can. No—wait—that eats the ozone layer...I meant HCFCs/HFCs—they're really strong greenhouse gases....
18 posted on 03/20/2015 9:54:13 PM PDT by __rvx86 (Rafael Cruz Jr: soon to be the first conservative, Latino President of the U.S. Si se puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Wonder about the ozone hole? err Off topic.


19 posted on 03/20/2015 10:01:32 PM PDT by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: __rvx86

Yes, but methane breaks down much quicker the CO2.


20 posted on 03/20/2015 10:04:52 PM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson