Posted on 03/15/2015 8:45:59 PM PDT by daniel1212
Bipolar schizophrenic... fag who believes in the 2nd amendment.
winner!
As said, when you consider the goals the author of this movement then you realize it means total domination.
Like sodomite pressing upon Lot in trying for force their way into the house to "know" the men, the demonic forces under the devil, who seeks universal worship by proxy in an alternative society, want total domination, with the devil's alternatives displacing what God created.
If you want to see where the atheists and liberal's training is heading, understand what the devil - the selfish originator of the "occupy movement" and "share the wealth" victim-entitlement movement - seeks. A vote for his proxies is a vote for him.
But as seen in the end,
And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever. (Revelation 11:15)
The key to winning is easy. There is no way to determine who is “gay” and who is straight. So claiming to be “gay” affords you a lot of protection. Society says gays are born that way. So how do you know you aren’t “gay”?
Not surprising, as prohomosexual polemicists have engaged in an inordinate amount of work seeking to change the Bible to conform to them as well. Examined and refuted here by the grace of God.
No, going out and killing whomever you don’t like is not the 2nd Amendment, which is actually about having militias for homeland defense, and allowing citizens to have weapons so that they can gather a militia should the need arise.
No, he’s not calling for vigilantism at all.
He’s proposing that the armed homosexuals be legitimate law enforcement officers with the full range of police powers.
It’s actually a very slick way to circumvent the exact scenario you describe: he can, simultaneously, call for arming gays (which is a good thing, IMHO - the more legitimate gun owners carrying for self-defense purposes the better IMHO) while also advocating for further gun restrictions (which wouldnt apply to LEOs).
Whatever the Lord has made or set up, the Devil seems to wish to offer an alternative. Sometimes the alternative looks pretty good, almost divine. You’ve got to pay close attention.
The Sabbath, an alternative. Good vs evil. Heterosexuality vs homosexuality. Wholesome activity, destructive activity. Activity to build others up, activity to tear others down. Earning an income, ripping other people’s income away.
When I think of whether something is right or not, I try to use this concept as a tool. I think of what ‘should’ be right here, and does this conform to that.
Homosexuality does not conform. It is an alternative.
God in His infinite wisdom set the pattern for us in the Garden of Eden. A man, a woman.
If you watch part of a homosexual parade (I think it would be very hard to watch the whole thing), you notice that everything is focused on sex. It isn’t focused on love for one another.
Large emblems of genitalia are prominent. It seems to tell what the movement is all about, at least for the participants. It’s also about shock value, and demonstrating behaviors to the public they truly wish to offend and insult.
I believe some homosexuals are as disgusted with these outward displays as we are. It makes a bad impression for them all.
I have friends who are homosexuals. They are decent people otherwise. I don’t hate them. I think what they are doing is wrong, but in the end God will judge them like he’ll judge me.
I am a sinner like everyone else. He may see some of my sins to be worse than theirs. I think most of us fit in somewhere close to that. It’s a sad thing to think though.
This guy’s initiative won’t float...this time.
“Bipolar schizophrenic... fag who believes in the 2nd amendment.”
No, they’re a part of the guns for me and not for thee crowd.
Good point. If a heterosexual parade mimicked the manner of displays and behavior of sodomite parades then it would be censured even by the left.
I have friends who are homosexuals. They are decent people otherwise. I don’t hate them. I think what they are doing is wrong, but in the end God will judge them like he’ll judge me.
There are different kinds of sins. There are those which pertain to things which are a result of desires of the flesh, such as drinking, smoking, overeating, fornication, etc., and there are those of the heart such as idolatry, blasphemy, heart, dishonesty, slander, maliciousness, covetousness, premeditated violence, etc.
You can have a man which has a degree of weakness for drinking (like Grant and Churchill) or the like, and who may commit sins of passion (as David), yet who overall have integrity, trustworthy character, sacrificial commitment and loyalty, and may excel in certain abilities.
Then you have a man who may have not the former kind of sins, but they are conniving, deceitful, and or backbiting, selfish, envious souls who dishonestly insidiously work to destroy others and what is right in God's eyes.
Such are what much characterizes the liberalism you see in the MSM and such as sites as salon.com. And such homosexual activists who follow (consciously or not) the marketing strateg y of Harvard-trained (homosexual) psychologists [47] Marshall Kirk (1957 - 2005) and Hunter Madsen in After the Ball.
And which victimization scheme and homophobic intimidation tactics i think are quite common among active homosexuals, esp. males. And as they are also usually driven by lust and are quite promiscuous, despite the well established typical deleterious effects of this, and must engage in a greater degree of suppression of conscience, then i think this usually is concomitant with the latter manner of sins.
However, there are exceptions, for those there is more hope of conversion to the Lord Jesus.
Thanks for the note of agreement, and I agree with your thoughts also. You make a reasoned point about types of sins. Each man is sinful, but there are different types of sins, and they do reveal certain mindsets as you touch on.
I think all of these refer to characteristic practices, and which come out of a premeditated heart.
I agree. I try very hard to not consciously commit sin, but I’ve got to tell you, I’m not always successful.
There are times when it’s hard to discern actual meaning in some of the Bible texts.
I believe a confident look is very much like a proud look. I believe people should be confident and proud of who they are. We are all sinners, but people who strive to be good and have worked hard for what they have, should be proud.
Perhaps what is intended by that is those that look down on others from a position of pride. That I could understand.
No, a confident look is not a proud look that God condemns, but refers to that which express a heart which is vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind," in arrogance and conceit, a Mussolini look, and which the original elitists expressed, (Is. 14:13,14) and is not conscious and sobered by one's vulnerability and needs.
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible says,
Those sins are in a special manner provoking to God, which are hurtful to the comfort of human life. These things which God hates, we must hate in ourselves; it is nothing to hate them in others. Let us shun all such practices, and watch and pray against them; and avoid, with marked disapproval, all who are guilty of them, whatever may be their rank.
In contrast to the proud, one may have confidence in his God-given abilities, but is not deluded into thinking of himself as invulnerable, but is conscious of his shortcomings and need.
For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith. (Romans 12:3)
Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall. (1 Corinthians 10:12)
Not to be dismissive, but aren’t they actually talking about a pious demeanor. Another words looking at your fellow man thinking you are more righteous than they are?
Sodomy is one of them.
Genesis 18:20-21
Campaigning for 2016 already? Sandy Fluke just got done p*ssing away a million bucks of her inlaws dough on the last one...
It was, and sodomy is fruit of idolatry, as it is the devil's alternative to one of God's most basic creations. Thus as with idolatry, sodomy there is no provision by which sodomy can be sanctioned, unlike heterosexual relations.
However, the iniquity of Sodom which was very grievous, (Genesis 18:20) was not simply sodomic relations, but "pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good." (Ezekiel 16:49-50)
Pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness are usually concomitant with the abomination of sodomy.
And today we do not simply battle some souls who secretly engage in homosexual relations, but who deceitfully work to persuade or compel all to submit to its promoters, and affirm it. Like as they pressed upon the door of Lot, who naively thought he could reason with such.
But as God is merciful, so there are some sodomites that can be saved in repentance and faith, just as He drew, convicted and granted repentance to straights, thanks be to God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.