Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Walker could become the world’s most powerful man. So who the hell is he?
News Australia ^ | March 14, 2015

Posted on 03/14/2015 4:31:50 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

Jeb Bush was born on third - - thinks he hit a triple.

Hillary Clinton married a powerful man. Then she trashed the women he raped and molested. That’s her ‘claim to fame’... a common thug - without the talent of her husband.


61 posted on 03/14/2015 6:48:23 AM PDT by GOPJ (Obama on Hillary: "I did not have TEXT with that woman"... Freeper hoosiermama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Only a fool shoots every other horse in the paddock.

Personally I think the combination of Cruz and Walker is a winner. A midwest/south ticket cuts right to the core of flyover country.


62 posted on 03/14/2015 6:51:48 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

...another observation from Wisconsin.

Previous to Walker being governor, the position of lieutenant governor was a figure-head, at best. Walker has tasked his lieutenant governor, Rebecca Kleefisch, with economic development growth efforts. She has been heading councils, meeting business-leaders, working with municipal leaders... in an effort to bring businesses and jobs to Wisconsin.

It is also allowing Rebecca to begin building her own political connections, should she choose to run for, say, a vacant governor’s position...

Walker doesn’t want to leave Wisconsin headless. He is doing a great job of building future leadership.


63 posted on 03/14/2015 7:19:29 AM PDT by OldCountryBoy (You can't make this stuff up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: OldCountryBoy

Very good point! Rebecca is everywhere, and I get as many messages in my inbox from her as I get from Scott!


64 posted on 03/14/2015 7:28:24 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
[immigration stance] is generally a decent indicator

I tend to use the second amendment as my "indicator." It is a good way to identify those that agree with me that government is really the enemy, or at least the potential enemy. If you oppose guns, you are either uneducated or the enemy. If you are ok with guns, but emphasize hunting or personal protection, then you are likely just uneducated. If you acknowledge that guns protect citizens from enemies, foreign and domestic (including the government), then I agree with you.

I use this when selecting books for my kids' schooling. I use this when listening to politicians. I use this when identifying friends (and enemies).

The problem I have with using illegal immigration is that in many parts of the country it is not a significant local issue. I moved from Southern California to Wisconsin. Night and day the difference is. Funniest thing to me was seeing white people doing landscaping.

With Walker focusing on Wisconsin problems it probably never entered his mind as an issue. Now that he is looking at national issues, he is having to form an opinion on this and many other non-Wisconsin things. It appears that he is forming correct opinions. Unfortunately a "gotcha" attempt, along with selective quoting, makes it seem he is softer than he appears to really be.

It will be interesting to watch as he figures out his positions on these things.

65 posted on 03/14/2015 8:30:16 AM PDT by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse

Governor Walker is second on my short list of two.
1. SENATOR TED CRUZ
2. Governor Scott Walker


66 posted on 03/14/2015 8:49:02 AM PDT by duffee (Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosef.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Note the photos and captions that accompany this piece.

Hehe!

At least Jeb Bush looks presidential.

Not so much for President Reagan, President George H Bush, and of course, the demon Walker.

67 posted on 03/14/2015 10:35:57 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (The Gruber Revelations are proof that God is still smiling on America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse

I will always vote for the more conservative candidate. I think that’s what Ronald Reagan recommended. If Jeb runs against Hillary and you can convince me that Hillary is the more conservative candidate I’ll either stay home or vote for her. Otherwise I will crawl over broken glass to vote for Jeb.


68 posted on 03/14/2015 11:01:45 AM PDT by Mercat (forgive all your DeeDees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Who the hell is Scott Walker? Suffice to say he’s the person most hated by the Left today, certainly reason enough to vote for him. Fortunately, there are so many more reasons to vote for him.


69 posted on 03/14/2015 1:03:39 PM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

I could be wrong, but as I understand it, Obama’s big immigration plan has a massive problem, a judge sitting right on top of it.

I’m not clear on what the exact status is, but this judge stopped something in it’s tracks.

Obama can go ahead and play games, but if this judge’s decision is upheld, all the normalization is dead in the water.


70 posted on 03/14/2015 9:56:49 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

BTW: I agree that fiscal responsibility is a big must. Cruz strikes me as the type of guy that wouldn’t just let that coast. He’d get some advisers in there to help. I wouldn’t be surprised if he would ask Walker to give him advice too.


71 posted on 03/14/2015 9:58:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

The United States has NEVER had a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. While it has been granted from time to time, it’s not on the books.

To reference that matter as if it’s always been on the books, isn’t accurate at all.

This is a very big deal. I still say we either have 30 plus million illegals in country, or tens of millions of them have already be normalized behind our backs.


72 posted on 03/14/2015 10:00:50 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole

I’m pretty jaded across the board when it comes to illegal immigration. That’s my go to subject. Sure I expect there to be support for the Second Amendment, but that’s a given. If that isn’t there the guy is dead in the water.

Too many of these ‘great guys’ have a pathway plan. To me that is a cop-out. It’s just smoke and mirrors and boy have I had enough of that game plan.

I do not want to see illegal immigrants granted the keys to the kingdom for their treachery.

They can go right back home, and I don’t care if they’ve been here 50 years and have all sorts of property.

People who chose to break the law, can damn well face the music when they are caught.

They made the choice to submit to the penalties when they circumvented the laws on our books.

If someone wants to feel sorry for someone, fell sorry for the taxpayers that had their wallets stripped so illegals could get government services for free.


73 posted on 03/14/2015 10:06:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

‘Path to citizenship’ outside of already established immigration law is amnesty. Period.

Amnesty indicates future violations will not be tolerated, so even ‘amnesty’ is a lie. It is open borders.


74 posted on 03/14/2015 10:07:05 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Absolutely right.

So when someone starts the pathway talk, and it not being an amnesty, they’re telling me right there that they don’t mind lying to my face.

I swear I don’t get why these idiot politicians are so motivated to help illegal aliens of the citizens of the United States.


75 posted on 03/14/2015 10:09:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“I could be wrong, but as I understand it, Obama’s big immigration plan has a massive problem, a judge sitting right on top of it.”

The judge has stopped it for now but the Justice Department is appealing. The case will ultimately be heard by the Supreme Court. Meanwhile the illegals continue to stream across the border and the State Department continues to resettle legally hundreds of thousands of UN designated “refugees” in the US under existing law. Refugee resettlement is responsible for the Somali communities in Tennessee and Minnesota. There have been news reports the administration will bring 100,000 Syrian refugees into this country in 2015.

In addition, there have been reports the administration has been quietly issuing hundreds of thousands of social security numbers and green cards despite the judges orders.

Finally, Congress did appropriate the money to fund Obama’s amnesty program when they had the power not to fund it. When the case goes before the Supreme Court you can bet the administration will argue Congress did not have to appropriate the funds. The funds were appropriated by Congress so he has de facto approval by Congress of his actions. Case closed. I can easily see the Roberts Court buying into this logic.


76 posted on 03/15/2015 5:45:39 AM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

I don’t necessarily disagree with your thoughts here. I can see that progression as well. I can also see a good man like Cruz in the Oval office in two years, asking his Justice Department to vacate the case.

I stridently disagree with the refugee immigration these days. It’s a flagrant attempt to water down and destroy the national unity of the United States.

In the early 1900s, there was a moratorium on immigration for several decades. IMO< that sort of thing needs to happen again right now.

Early during a Conservative administration, that needs to be put in place.

It’s my hope that the court will either refuse to overturn the lower court, or it will find a way to stall until a new administration can return this nation to some form of sanity.


77 posted on 03/15/2015 7:51:39 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson