Posted on 03/12/2015 8:49:18 PM PDT by Whenifhow
Obama is going to the UN to get approval instead of getting approval of the senate.
Marc Thiessen said that Obama intends that UN will give it force of international law.
The problem is that the Constitution trumps international law.
Obama is trying to make it difficult for the next president to revoke the deal.
LEVIN: Obama to use U.N. to ram through Iran deal, pretend it allows him to IGNORE CONSTITUTION
http://therightscoop.com/levin-obama-to-use-u-n-to-ram-through-iran-deal-pretend-it-allows-him-to-ignore-constitution/
We now know why Thad Cochran did not sign the Senate letter to Iran and its not good
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3267312/posts
LEVIN: Obama to use U.N. to ram through Iran deal, pretend it allows him to IGNORE CONSTITUTION
We now know why Thad Cochran did not sign the Senate letter to Iran and its not good
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3267312/posts
the ‘force of international law’ is ZERO
unless a force is mobilized
and usually this has required the USA to shoulder most of the burden
this is all BS.
BS flag goes here:
GOP Goes Ballistic Over Plan to Take The Iran Nuke Deal to the U.N.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3267339/posts
now would be a good time for the Congress to start legislation to remove the UN from USA (and perhaps vice-versa)
Yes.
Watch: Michelle O Just Reached Out To Islamic Iran With A Big White House Party
And Said THIS
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3267229/posts
First Lady Michelle Obama hosted a Nowruz celebration of the Iranian New Year, throwing open the doors of the White House earlier this week to mark the official start of the Persian holiday thats been celebrated for thousands of years. Nowruz means The New Day and is the name of the Iranian New Year, marking the beginning of the year in the Persian calendar.
Now this strikes me with memory of something along the lines of “..leading all nations..”.wait for it...
Now, that would be treason.
Can we impeach him now?
Obama is still under the allusion that he is the King Of The World.
The USA is just one of his provinces - and not a favorite one at that.
He has no status to make that deal... it would be no different then the state dept making a binding deal without Obama signing off... the Presidents authority is granted by the Constitution.. and its is also limited by the Constitution.. if he tries the pull this off he is willing to go for a pure power grab so the idea of him trying to remain in power after his term expired is really a possibility
The secret Muslim is TURNING HIS BACK ON CONGRESS AND DETERMINED TO HELP IRAN, at ALL costs. RED FLAG, AMERICA!!!!!!!
Barry stokes the fire in Ferguson in order to help make it more difficult to impeach a black man.
That story came from Reuters originally and this is what I found there:
Exclusive: ISIS using Christians as human shields
In its ongoing rampage in Syria and Iraq, the Islamic State is now using its Christian hostages as human shields in military confrontations, according to a source within the Assyrian leadership. ISIS militants have transported large groups of Christian captives to areas of intense fighting against Kurdish and Christian militias, as they continue to battle for strategic areas along the northeastern Syrian border, according to state-run media. These Christians are now being used to defend the Islamic State against any confrontations in these territories.
Again, America's enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC are giving more power to the UN to make decisions for the direction of the United States of America.Exclusive: Major nations hold talks on ending U.N. sanctions on Iran - officials
(Reuters) - Major world powers have begun talks about a United Nations Security Council resolution to lift U.N. sanctions on Iran if a nuclear agreement is struck with Tehran, a step that could make it harder for the U.S. Congress to undo a deal, Western officials said.UNITED NATIONS
The talks between Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany and Iran, are taking place ahead of difficult negotiations that resume next week over constricting Iran's nuclear ability.
*snip*
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told Congress on Wednesday that an Iran nuclear deal would not be legally binding, meaning future U.S. presidents could decide not to implement it. That point was emphasized in an open letter by 47 Republican senators sent on Monday to Iran's leaders asserting any deal could be discarded once President Barack Obama leaves office in January 2017.
But a Security Council resolution on a nuclear deal with Iran could be legally binding, say Western diplomatic officials. That could complicate and possibly undercut future attempts by Republicans in Washington to unravel an agreement.
Officials said a U.N. resolution could help protect any nuclear deal against attempts by Republicans in U.S. Congress to sabotage it. Since violation of U.N. demands that Iran halt enrichment provide a legal basis for sanctioning Tehran, a new resolution could make new sanction moves difficult.
"There is an interesting question about whether, if the Security Council endorses the deal, that stops Congress undermining the deal," a Western diplomat said.
Other Western officials said Republicans might be deterred from undermining any deal if the Security Council unanimously endorses it and demonstrates that the world is united in favor of a diplomatic solution to the 12-year nuclear standoff.
Treason, impeachable treason.
Click on the titles of the thread and the article to read more.
Still doesn’t make it legal, OTrauma.
He can take his deal to United Artists and have a movie made out of it. It still won’t mean jack squat!
I think he’s off w his GF.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.