[SoConPubbie]

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton "We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan "A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792 "It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

[SoConPubbie]

Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

CRUZ or LOSE!

CRUZ or LOSE!

[grania]

This is an example of how Ted Cruz's intellect can identify the source of problems, which has to happen before they can be solved.

How long can the media keep up the myth of those bogus polls showing Ted Cruz as lagging in support?

[Usagi_yo]

It’s difficult to say that the SCOTUS was wrong. Back in 1982 the situation was different. Culminating in Amnesty — which wasn’t so hot a topic back then. Most agreed it was appropriate.

What Obama is doing is reach out and into the Latin American countries and giving them a tacit invite, he includes handouts because it will draw the poor and destitute, so he’s seeding the Democratic party for the future.

[Tennessee Nana]

“There is a very strong argument that the 14th Amendment doesn’t require that,” Cruz said.
____________________________________________

Eh ???

The 14th Amendment doesn’t apply to illegal aliens..

the 14th Amendment doesn’t require the government to do or give anything to illegal aliens...

[WIBamian]

The article "estimated that it would cost states $761 million to provide K-12 education for the 37,000 Central American child migrants released to relatives in the United States during the first seven months of 2014"

The money saved if we didn't give it to illegal invaders could do alot for American citizens in seven months!

Use that money to target business owners that employ illegal invaders and also landlords that rent to illegal invaders. Use that money to pay down our national debt. Use that money to prosecute corrupt politicians. Use that money to fund better services for our disabled military veterans. Use that money to put the Chamber of Amnesty out ouf business!

[alstewartfan]

Outrageous abuse of power, one which the GOP of the day refused to attack. Bob

[Ray76]

Ted Cruz questions Supreme Court ruling ordering free education for immigrant kids illegal aliens

[KC_Lion]

Shazam!

You could write a whole essay about how this ties in with the School Lunch Program too.

You have got to get and keep people dependent on the Government.

It is how is grows and sustains itself.

"If you don't feed them, they won't come"

[sickoflibs]

RE:”Plyler v. Doe as a legal matter is certainly binding Supreme Court precedent,” Cruz said. “You can have a theoretical argument about the role of the Supreme Court. But I do think there is value in the principle of stare decisis, which is a Latin term for things which are decided. There is value in legal precedent.”

This is contrary to those who claim that if we don't think somethings in the constitution, then we don't have to follow it as law.

[Organic Panic]

United States of America. US citizens need not apply.

[SharpRightTurn]

“Sen. Ted Cruz said Monday that the Supreme Court probably made the wrong decision in 1982 when it ruled that public schools must provide free education to children who are in the country illegally.”

Of course they got it wrong. But the 5 fevered black-robed savants that voted to mandate that states fund free education for illegals probably felt better about themselves after giving this goodie by judicial fiat (at the expense of the American taxpayer).

[lakecumberlandvet]

The 1982 decision by the USSC in the Plyler v. Doe case was made using the same material used in the 1973 Roe v.Wade case: whole cloth. In both cases the USSC decided upon fabrication when no constitutional basis existed for the decisions. The Executive and Legislative branches of government and the states just blindly obeyed the USSC mandates instead of rejecting them as outright unconstitutional and, therefore, not enforceable. Adherence to both unconstitutional actions have caused great damage to our country.

[HiJinx]

Ping!

Click the keyword Aliens to see more illegal alien, border security, and other related threads.

[Monorprise]

““There is a very strong argument that the 14th Amendment doesn’t require that,” Cruz said.”

There is a strong argument that the 14th amendment doesn’t apply to foreigners just like it don’t apply to Indians. The same argument made by the crafters, and radifers when thy inserted the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.

Unfortunately for our republic Federal employees in black robes have a long history of ignoring the Federal Constitution when it comes to limiting their appointing masters or their own power.

[Monorprise]

““Plyler v. Doe as a legal matter is certainly binding Supreme Court precedent,” Cruz said. “You can have a theoretical argument about the role of the Supreme Court. But I do think there is value in the principle of stare decisis, which is a Latin term for things which are decided. There is value in legal precedent.””

If the Federal Employees in black robes believed in “stare decisis” the ruling “Plyler v. Doe” would be moot, as the same court had already ruled as the the 14th amendment did not apply to foreigner as the operative clause “Subject to the jurisdiction there of” said according to the original authors and radifers.

Frankly the Federal employees have no ground to stand upon in upholding that clearly unlawful edict.