Posted on 03/03/2015 11:17:13 AM PST by Titus-Maximus
“He tells Eyewitness News exclusively that when he refused to work with pork, the major retailer sent him outside to gather carts. ‘Just because you have a different belief, that doesn’t give anybody the right to treat you different,’ said Jean Camara, suing Costco.”
Note the paradox: he is claiming that he was subjected to religious discrimination, when what really happened was that he was prevented from discriminating against non-Muslim customers by refusing to act as cashier for those with pork and alcohol.
Here’s your pink slip and FU. Don’t let the door hit you on the ass.
screw you, you know the job and what you had to do.
This muslim appeasement has to stop.
Fit the Muzzie with a pickled Pig's Foot suppository and tell him to find another job.
I wonder what would happen if she refused to sell a cake to a couple of fags. She’d probably get HER @$$ sued I guess.
They always sold pork and have needed people to store it and to check it out.
If your religion bans you from doing those jobs then you can bring carts back.
How is this different than the Christian baker that would not make a cake for a LGBYLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ wedding?
But the fire chief in Atlanta got fired for a Christian devotional book he authored.
Whoops! I thought this guy was a female. Bummer!
Whats the matter Muzzie...? Collecting carts below you? F off!
The baker was running his/her own business. If the baker worked for a bakery and the bakery requested he/she make a cake for a gay wedding and the baker he/she should be fired.
The baker owns the business.
A whole religion based on the idea of being “pushy”.....
My grocery store had a muzzie lady working the cash register when I tried to check out with some wine. She wouldn’t do it so the wussy manager obliged.
I saw the same lady the next week carrying a tray of cracker and dip samples. I asked her if she could help me find the canned hams and bacon. Looked like she was gonna sh** her...whatever it is she was wearing.
I'm guessing a refusal to do the work he was originally assigned had something to do with it. And if he wasn't such an idiot he'd have reached the same conclusion.
WE HAVE A WINNER!!!! No more calls please!
The baker was not in the business of selling cakes for celebrating deviant relationships; had never done so in the past; and never indicated in any of her business dealings that she was interested in or willing to engage in that business.
In this case, the person works for another business that has sold these products for years, advertises them to the public, etc. So the employee had full knowledge that these products were a part of the normal business conducted by their employer at the time he/she was hired. When the employee refused to do the job for which they were hired, the company did not fire the employee, but gave them another assignment that did not compel them to violate their religious principles (an option not given to the baker).
I thought the pork was wrapped in a leak proof package, so all she is handling is the package.
Plastic gloves ain’t out of style!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
