Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2015 6:26:58 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

[Hillary!]...is reported to be in seclusion awaiting her facelift scars to heal!

If this beotch wins the Presidency, all is lost.


2 posted on 02/24/2015 6:29:23 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

And Governor Walker had better get his Foreign Policy ideas in order - STAT!


3 posted on 02/24/2015 6:30:15 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nothing new or profound in that article.

HilLiaRy is a loser and she’ll be destroyed by Ted Cruz.


5 posted on 02/24/2015 6:35:45 AM PST by subterfuge (Minneseeota: the laughingstock of the nation - for lots of reasons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I like Scott Walker but I really don't think he can out perform Ted Cruz in any debate format. Cruz will shine in the debates.


6 posted on 02/24/2015 6:40:49 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’ve said for many months that I’m not sure Hillary! will run - she’s delayed her announcement until July (saying something like she has plenty of time). From what I’ve been hearing and reading, looks like Jim Webb will throw his hat in the ring. He’s considered to be a “moderate” Democrat, at least by some. He’s a veteran, has served under one administration, has been a senator and is from VA. IMHO he’d be a much more formidable candidate than Hillary.


7 posted on 02/24/2015 6:42:17 AM PST by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
This should be EVERYONE'S response to "Hillary Clinton, ...is reported to be in seclusion developing her economic policies."


8 posted on 02/24/2015 6:43:28 AM PST by Mich Patriot (Pitch black is the new "transparent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’ve never seen a “good” picture of Hillary nor a “bad” picture of Sarah. Liberalism causes ugly.


10 posted on 02/24/2015 6:45:30 AM PST by Graybeard58 ( For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It really won’t matter how many pointed questions are directed at presumptive ‘rat candidate Clinton because her supporters won’t care what her answers are or if she answers at all.


11 posted on 02/24/2015 6:54:51 AM PST by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

You know, that puckered face and hand gesture is just wrong on so many levels.

20 posted on 02/24/2015 7:32:28 AM PST by uglybiker (nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hmmm, why didn’t 2 BILLION to the Clinton Foundation make it into this article Mr. Barone?


23 posted on 02/24/2015 10:07:45 AM PST by CPT Clay (Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bush v. Clinton

Big whoop.


27 posted on 02/24/2015 10:15:28 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Read this on the net, though this guy had some good points:

“No amount of rebranding will get me past the following:
1. Do I want a person running the economy who declared that they left the Whitehouse broke. This after 8 years where one of them was being paid $400K a year. $3.2 million in eight years and they came out broke!

2. Do I want a chief executive/commander-in-chief who has demonstrated that they can’t perform under stress. I mean, seriously. A person who is not able to continue to function and tell the truth when tired. Can’t imagine what she would be likely to come up with or say in a high stress continuing world crisis. I know that she is, “in no ways tard”. I do believe she should be tarred and maybe even feathered, but I digress.

3. A commander-in-chief who promises to be there for the three a.m. phone call but when confronted with a five p.m. phone call completely drops the ball. Huh? Maybe she is a morning person and her bio-rhythms are at a low in the late afternoon/early evening.

4. Do I want a person who has demonstrated that they cannot manage a Departmental (State Dept - $6B not able to be accounted for) after 4 years. In the big bad corporate world a CEO/CFO that turned in that sort of performance would be booted and not likely to get a look-in anywhere else. Why do we tolerate this with politicians?”


28 posted on 02/24/2015 10:18:07 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

33 posted on 02/24/2015 12:00:43 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Bush / Clinton 2016! Clinton / Bush 2020! Uniparty Rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson