Posted on 02/23/2015 11:17:28 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
When Barack Obama was first elected president, a number of my readers were in deep despair about American politics and the state of our culture. So I set out to compile an inventory of what is still going right with our culture, the reserves of strength we were going to have to draw on to survive the Obama era.
One of my examples was Mike Rowes show Dirty Jobs. That led to some further ruminations about why people on the right tend to gravitate to shows like his, which celebrate the value of work.
Rowe himself has been understandably cautious about wading into politicswhy risk alienating a big portion of his audience? (One wishes other celebrities were so circumspect.) But very recently, he has begun to indicate where his sympathies lie. There is the Facebook post I mentioned above about the minimum wage, which shows a strong, concrete understanding of the basic operation of the free market. And then there is a subsequent post in which he responds to a question about whether Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker should be disqualified from running for president because he didnt graduate from college. (Walker left in his senior year to take a job offer.)
Rowe begins with a long and very funny description of how he got his first television job for the online shopping network QVC. Its subtle, but you might also notice that he makes an implicit comparison between the job of president and that of a QVC pitchman. He concludes with an argument against confus[ing] qualifications with competency.
Given that not president since Reagan hasnt been a graduate of either Harvard or Yaleand they havent even gotten close to matching the results of the bumpkin who graduated from Eureka Collegeits certainly reasonable to suspect that those Ivy League credentials arent all theyre cracked up to be.I think the stigmas and stereotypes that keep so many people from pursuing a truly useful skill begin with the mistaken belief that a four-year degree is somehow superior to all other forms of learning. And I think that making elected office contingent on a college degree is maybe the worst idea Ive ever heard.
But the whole controversy isnt really about Scott Walkers qualifications. Its about something deeper.
On the surface, of course, its certainly about Scott Walker. The left-leaning mainstream media senses that hes a potential danger. After all, he has won three straight elections in a swing state, while challenging the public employees unions head-on and significantly reducing their government privileges. (This is precisely what makes him interesting to those of us on the right.) The mainstream media feel that they need to disqualify him now, so theyre looking for anything they can use against him.
But behind that, there is a more visceral reaction. The real purpose of higher education is to learn the knowledge and skills required for success later in life. So if someone has already become a success, whether or not he went to college is irrelevant. If he has achieved the end, what does it matter that he didnt do it by way of that specific means? But for the mainstream elites, particularly those at the top level in the media, a college education is not simply a means to an end. It is itself a key attainment that confers a special social status.
There are no real class divisions in America except one: the college-educated versus the non-college educated. It helps to think of this in terms borrowed from the world of a Jane Austen novel: graduating from college is what makes you a gentleman. (A degree from an Ivy League school makes you part of the aristocracy.) It qualifies you to marry the right people and hold the right kind of positions. It makes you respectable. And even if you dont achieve much in the world of work and business, even if youre still working as a barista ten years later, you still retain that special status. Its a modern form of genteel poverty, which is considered superior to the regular kind of poverty.
If you dont have a college degree, by contrast, you are looked down upon as a vulgar commoner who is presumptuously attempting to rise above his station. Which is pretty much what theyre saying about Scott Walker. This prejudice is particularly strong when applied to anyone from the right, whose retrograde views are easily attributed to his lack of attendance at the gentlemans finishing school that is the university.
That brings us to the heart of the matter. I have observed before that left-leaning politics has become part of the cultural class identity of college-educated people, a prejudice that lingers long after they have graduated. You can see how this goes the other way, too. If to be college-educated is to have left-leaning viewsthen to have the correct political values, one must be college-educated.
You can see now what is fueling the reaction on the left. If Scott Walker can run for president, he is challenging the basic cultural class identity of the mainstream left. He is more than a threat to the Democrats hold on political power. He is a threat to the existing social order.
GOOD!!
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Vegas odds are now even on which is the greater threat to the social order, Scott Walker or globalwarmingclimatechange.
If you can get Isis to destroy ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, CPB, CNN, then Walker has a chance.
“You can see now what is fueling the reaction on the left. If Scott Walker can run for president, he is challenging the basic cultural class identity of the mainstream left. He is more than a threat to the Democrats hold on political power. He is a threat to the existing social order.”
Scott Walker literally makes liberal heads explode. I just love that sound!
Ancient military strategist Sun Tzu wrote,
Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponents fate.
It looks like the ‘uneducated’ Governor Walker is a lot better educated than his opponents, and is beginning to direct their fates.
No way man - Scott Walker didn’t say exactly the thing I wanted him to say on my single-issue obsession, so there’s no way I’ll EVER vote for him!
/at least 10% of Free Republic
My thought exactly...
Walker amnesty deniers are so smug.
The more I read about Walker, the more I like him.
LOL and who wants to maintain the current social order?
Scott Walker is not one of the ruling class and they hate him for it.
LOL!
Yes, and that makes a vote for Walker the same as voting for Hillary!
“/at least 10% of Free Republic”
Those people are such purists they wouldn’t even vote for themselves.
/at least 10% of Free Republic
Those people are such purists they wouldnt even vote for themselves.
LOL So true.
Just what we need at this time. A leader who does not back down and play the media’s stupid games.
For all of you who think that Walker is pro-amnesty. Wisconsin is one of the states that joined Texas in suing Obama over his unconstitutional amnesty.
I love it!
He is my candidate. BTW Wisconsin is one of the states suing Obama over his EO on amnesty.
Go Walker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.