Oh, God forbid you draw conclusions from his actions!!
“Dan Senor, a prominent Republican adviser on a range of issues, did not discuss Mr. Walker directly in an email exchange with The New York Times on Friday, but said he saw little value in his party getting bogged down in a discussion about the president’s mindset. “
Yes, whatever you do, don’t discuss the motivation of Hussein. We have much more important things to do like nominating a fall guy RINO to lose to Hillary and trying to get back to the minority in Congress again so we don’t have to hurt anybody’s feelings.
“...“One of the challenges of running for president is how you handle events where you’re introduced and the news from the introduction overtakes your campaign message of the day,” said Scott Reed, the top political strategist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce...”
****************************************************************************************************
When it comes to Scott Walker and Ted Cruz, we can expect never ending “concern” from the likes of the Chamber of Commerce and other RINO Amnesty advocates. So I guess we just need to consider the source.
Of course, I guess we have our own “concern trolls” here also.
Liberals know Giuliani hit close to home, so they are trying to deflect by using it to destroy the stronger GOP candidates.
Walker is brilliant for not getting dragged into this liberal game and has turned the tables on the liberal establishment that fears him greatly.
Only the politically STUPID think we should be spouting off about Obama’s beliefs, thinking or internal processes.
Let non-candidates, like Giuliani, do the dirty work while our candidates focus on the issues.
After all, that is what is important.
In prior years a person was responsible for their own words or actions.
Now the New York Times and supposedly RINO Republicans are trying to make Gov. Walker responsible for the words or actions of others.
Or is this whole Guiliani thing an orchestrated and concocted plot by the Jeb Bush Team to make Walker look bad?
This is exactly what the Nytimes and the Left excel at, they take some slight against them and blow it up nationally and get the entire pundit class worked into a frenzy until the Republican is marginalized.
They did this with Romney’s 47% remark and their trying to do it again here. Tell me this, when is the last time the Nytimes similarly got worked up about something any Democrat politician said in the last hundred years?
Think of all the outrageous things Obama has said and done. Think of all the outrageous thing the Clintons have said and done.
Yeah. Get lost, Nytimes and WaPo, and all you other homosexual run protectors of the Left.
He refused to play the media game. Where is that a negative?
Wow — the Communist New York Times created that GOPe response out of whole cloth, finding shadows and emananations from what was said and not said.
Criticizing Giuliani's comments can now be classified as a hate crime against the Religion of Peace -- back in 2008 a Sunni cleric said that an "American communist" would destroy America. Isn't that what Giuliani is saying? Sunni Cleric: Allah Will Send an 'American Gorbachev' to End the American Empire Soon
Sunni cleric Sheik Muhammad Abu Al-Qat' said, "let me bring good tidings to the Muslims: Allah willing, the American empire will very soon collapse."
You Nytimese are hate mongers and Islamophobes if you dispute what a representative of the Religion of Peace says.. so there!
BTW. Notice a FReeper's
It’s amazing how what Rudy said turns into a story about Scott walker. Insane.
Dan Senor, grew up in Toronto and graduated from High School there, degrees from University of Western Ontario and also attended Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Father employed by Israel Bonds, mother born and grew up in Slovakia (Wikipedia).
Therefore, an expert on whether or not "Obama" loves America.
We have come to the point in America where the truth may not be uttered for fear of losing votes.
The truth may not now be uttered for fear of being branded a bigot or a racist.
The truth may not now be uttered for fear of being attacked from all sides for voicing an opinion.
The truth may not now be uttered for fear of losing one’s business or job.
It’s just a very short step from where we are to the point where the truth may not be uttered for fear of losing one’s freedom, home, business, family or....one’s head.
But history always repeats because too many forget it or never know it.
Until repubs insist on the same standard we are at a huge disadvantage.
Look! Dan Senor, GOPee gurlyman!The idea is not to give a considered or detailed response to a stupid question. If they ask the question over and over, more people will start wondering if 0bama does love America, and the media will need to ask 0bama that question directly.
Of course, 0bama will say he loves America, but to have to answer that question means that many have doubts- just like the BC, being a Christian etc.
When the Establishment Republicans are attacking you, you must be doing something right.
==
Depending on the thread/article, Walker has been referred to as ‘establishment’ and as ‘conservative’. He apparently has the media, the Dems, the Libs, and the GOP Elites confused, too.
Of course, that is the same media that claims Jeb Bush is conservative. In fact, according to many of them, he is the most conservative in the pack. One Jeb pusher went so far as to claim that ‘amnesty and open borders’ Jeb would actually lock down the border, if he won the election. [I still get a chuckle out of that claim.]
Craven bitches!
I saw nothing wrong about Dan Senor’s response. he
basically agreed that the question was nonsensical.
Scott Reed, OTOH, was idiotic in his response. Since Reed was the campaign manager for Bob Dole, I do not think he is in any position to question Scott Walker’s qualifications or his abilities to respond to silly media questions.
i have been saying this since 2006..
i will put it in terms that no one can misunderstand..
establishment republicans are democrats...
mainstream republicans are socialists...
conservative republicans are moderates...
hard line conservative republicans are barely conservative..
any questions?