Posted on 02/15/2015 10:37:24 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The debut edition of our leader board of the Republicans most likely to win the presidential nomination, based on what we know now, shows the field may not be as big as most people think.
1) JEB BUSH (age 62, to Hillary’s 67): He’s got money, momentum, Florida, big ideas. His surprise, early signal that he’s running is THE PLAY OF THE CAMPAIGN so far — pushing OUT Mitt and perhaps Christie by freezing or stealing their money and talent. Jeb will be first Republican to $100 million by a mile. Now, watch for the use of overwhelming force to lock up more talent, donors and public endorsements. His big unknown: actual voters. A story leading the Tampa Bay Times today says Iowa “looks hostile,” in part because voters actually matter.
2) GOV. SCOTT WALKER (age 47): He’s got a Wisconsin winning streak, union-bashing, newness and ambition. His boffo performance at the Iowa Freedom Summit got the chattering class to notice. Now, watch for him to position himself as conservative Midwest savior, snuggled between Jeb’s moderation and Cruz’s rigidity. After CPAC (a week and four days from now), Walker plans rat-a-rat trips to the three earliest states – Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina – within a month.
3) SEN. MARCO RUBIO (age 43): The Floridian is winning fans among future-thinking conservatives, especially younger ones. He’s buffing up on foreign policy and could plausibly be the most sophisticated national-security thinker in the field (grading on a curve, of course). He’s blowing off Senate votes to raise coin and planning trips to Iowa and New Hampshire. And in private, his aides are making clear his relationship with Bush wouldn’t be a deterrent. Remains Playbook’s top pick for veep under the “no two white dudes on a ticket” rule.
4) SEN. RAND PAUL (age 52): He’s got creativity, social-media savvy, an early-state organization, and the capacity to surprise. SCOOP: Rand plans to continue his effort to reach beyond traditional GOP audiences with an upcoming appearance at a historically black college (he’s still nailing down location). Now, watch to see if he can truly upend what we know about the GOP electorate — and Rand and his family.
5) SEN. TED CRUZ (age 44): His right-wing lingo and street cred could propel him to an Iowa win, which would rattle the GOP establishment and ignite a media frenzy. He heads to Florida on Friday, venturing onto Jeb/Marco turf, as Rand did yesterday. Cruz is trying to look more serious and less scary by emphasizing national security – he did fine last Sunday in satellite interviews from the Munich Security Conference with George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “This Week,” and Dana Bash on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Don’t discount how much true-believers like Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) like the guy.
THE REST: Gov. Chris Christie (age 52) was #5 when we first kicked around this list two weeks ago. Christie has candor, a winning record, raw ambition and some big donors. But Jeb’s fundraising juggernaut has squeezed Christie much worse than top Republicans had expected. And Christie’s London trip, where the biggest stories were about his stance on vaccines and his unwillingness to answer a question about ISIS, showed that the tough-guy shtick needs more work. Our leader board, of course, will change in radical ways in the weeks ahead, especially if another governor — John Kasich of Ohio, Mike Pence of Indiana — gets serious.
WHAT’D WE MISS? Tweet your thoughts and pushback to @mikeallen, or write us at mallen@politico.com.
That’s certainly the conventional wisdom. But I think it is wrong. Elect outside the box.
Then you like amnesty for illegal aliens.
I’m not voting for that.
Great combo but in reverse order...we need a Governor as president, not a senator...Governors do things, senators vote on things that others have done.
Pence would be great but nobody knows who he is...Mitch Daniels, on the other hand would be even better and he has national name recognition....and I live in Indiana!!
where did you find that info?
I just searched for his positions and found nothing that indicates amnesty. I did see a favorable position for bringing in migrant workers and returning them after harvest. That is not amnesty.
where did you find that info?
I just searched for his positions and found nothing that indicates amnesty. I did see a favorable position for bringing in migrant workers and returning them after harvest. That is not amnesty.
Oh please, you haven't been paying close attention as to how he handled the criminal union movement...he ate them for lunch....he has no time for illegal nonsense.
Forget evolution, immigration is Scott Walker’s real challenge
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/3257609/posts
Making a new “Waler / Travete” Team?
I always prefer someone with a certifiable record of accomplishments over an orator, no matter how much I like what he says.
Of the top five I’d say that Paul is the one most likely to self destruct. I think it boils down to Bush vs. Walker for the establishment and Rubio vs. Cruz for the non-establishment votes. And I just don’t see Rubio besting Cruz.
That's really a very unfair statement...he is not another Bush, he is a different Bush, a different person who should be judged on his own merits. Bill Gates is not his father, I am not my father....etc.
an ex- Senator that is now is President is doing a whole damn lot ...if conservatives could elect a Senato to become President and he does half as much as the current ex-Senator has done we’d be jumping in the streets for joy ...
that Senators can’t do things as President is the most bogus and easily disprovable argument on the planet, ...just watch the news...or pay your health insurance bill ...or count the number or illegals in the country...the current ex-Senator has done damn enough
Because Romney was such a huge success. </sarcasm>
I’d say that Schwartzenegger is a whole lot worse than 80 to 1.
THANK YOU!!!!!!!signed/Hillary
I may not agree with all his positions, but I believe, overall, Romney would have been a good president.
yeah, but the pubbies don't have a senator that is 100% evil, hates this country, is a muslim, lies constantly, and is totally useless....
Other than this jackass, there haven't been too many presidents who came from congress that were really successful....Governors, because they have and use authority in their office. Obama was a setup from the beginning and I'm not certain that it wasn't the folks from the middle east who set him up....please don't use him as an example of anything because his situation is UNIQUE
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.