David Horowitz has been saying it for years too. Whatever issue the left pushes, whether it be global warming/climate change or something else, "The issue is never about the issue. The issue is always about social revolution."
Posted on 02/14/2015 9:02:53 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine
Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man's stewardship of the environment. But we know that's not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this. At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...
I figured that out a long time ago. The whole CO2 scam is just an excuse to redistribute wealth globally.
What is truly amazing is how many people have bought the lie that a gas that is .04% of the atmosphere determines the temperature.
CO2 is vital to life on earth, without it life would cease. It is not a threat to our existence.
The next ice age is what people should be concerned about. We are overdue. Earth has been covered in ice more than it has been like it is now. We’ll wish we could make enough CO2 to heat up the planet when the Sun cycles down again.
” U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.”
Uh....DUH!
Do a bit of research. The CPUSA and its “fellow travelers” STARTED the global warming scam
The biggest greenhouse gas is water vapor.
I happened to be doing something other than focusing on the article when I clicked on it. Just as I was about to come back to the keyboard it loaded up. Took about a minute for it to load up. I think it had something to do with the picture of Figueres. That face looks like it could harm the internet more than Obama, and the FCC.
I ogled the title, but, seriously, it didn’t do anything for me.
You ogle it enough something will happen... LOL!
I’ll keep ogling and get back to you shortly.
I was reading some of the bilge over at demonrattic underworld this morning.
One story was about a drought in the SW US of never seen proportions. One that could last 40 years or more.
The DUmmies were frantic about the urgent need for the government to get involved to save us from Gorebull warming. Lakes/rivers needed to be covered with solar panels to prevent evaporation! No $hit, one of the morons really said that.
All manner of regulations were needed immediately, yesterday would be too late.
Just down the page is a story about some diver that found giant trees standing 60-100 feet tall hidden 100 feet below the surface of a big lake in the western US. They were dated to be 3,500 years old, and grew there during a long dry period many centuries ago.( No, not a manmade reservoir)
The DUmmies commented about how neat it was finding a forest that grew hundreds of feet under that lake, none of the idiots questioned the long drought 3,500 years ago that would have been required for those trees to grow there. Nobody wondered what evil industry caused Gorebull warming 3,500 years ago.
exactly, good points, and the other thing we could do is trap CO2 and place it near the ground, to absorb incoming sun/heat and reflect it back out towards space- but these people KNOW that there isn’t enough CO2 to do this, and they KNOW CO2 is a very poor heat transfer vehicle- so they suppress the truth and just keep screaming about evil man and our production of CO2 while PRETENDING that we are pumping so much CO2 into the atmosphere that it is choking of the atmosphere- The TRUTH however is that we only produce 0.0037% of the total atmospheric CO2 (which stands at a piddly insignificant 0.04% TOTAL)
“The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.”
They’ve already got this scrubbed???
thanks or htel inks-
By the way- I email every GOP senator asking them how I n the world just 0.04% of our atmosphere can be causing global climate change- and the only senator’s office that even bothered replying was Senator Ted Cruz’s with a canned answer that didn’t come out and deny man’s involvement, but said in essence “Our office is committed to ‘responsible laws’ to control CO2 emissions’ or something along those l lines-
NOT ONE senator answered the question-
I’ll try asking the GOP nominees for president one more time, and in the beginning I’ll word it soemthign like “Before I decide if you can have my vote or not, could you please explain to me how just 0.04% of our atmosphere can possibly be causing global climate change? And can you please explain to me how man’s piddly contribution of just .0037% (man’s contribution to the total atmospheric CO2 levels) can be, according to the left, ‘almost 100% responsible for global climate change?”
It sounds like your catastrophic converter might not be getting enough compression.
My neighbors - God Bless them, just shoveled 4’ of Gore-Bull warming off my roof - so’s the approaching blizzard won’t collapse it...not to mention more storms on the way next week.
Anyone up for a class action against Gore-bull? He’s been promising warming for years (which actually is a GOOD things, allowing for more crops, etc) but he hasn’t delivered. It just keeps getting colder.
This comes as a complete surprise to me, are you telling me that liberals are socialist and want to economically destroy America and would lie to achieve their goals?
Hey maniac- fellow former maniac here- anyways- Yep you guys are getting pounded- my relatives have been sending photos of the snow- it’s insane- Hopefulyl this latest storm will work more out to see for ya
David Horowitz has been saying it for years too. Whatever issue the left pushes, whether it be global warming/climate change or something else, "The issue is never about the issue. The issue is always about social revolution."
Not true. The level of CO2 has gone from 0.028% to 0.04% since the 1800's. Here's a depiction of natural CO2 fluctuations:
You can see that there are fluctuations from about 200 to 300 corresponding to a temperature rise of about 10C. Thus some of the current rise can be attributed to natural warming after the Little Ice Age, Assuming a 1C natural rise, that would be 10ppm rise in CO2.
So the question is where did the rest of the 120ppm rise come from? How come CO2 is still rising 2-3 ppm per year? The answer is in the data:
This data comes from simple economic data sources of cement production, but mainly fossil fuel burning: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_glob.html
They do: http://web.ornl.gov/sci/buildings/2012/1982%20B2%20papers/036.pdf
That is true. Moreover the distribution of water vapor varies depending on large scale weather patterns, mostly solar-driven. That's why in just a few weeks the global average temperature can rise or fall 0.1 or 0.2C. It is really lots of weather coincidences but also long term cycles especially ocean cycles that control the global average temperature.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.