Posted on 02/13/2015 3:45:51 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
This column is so easy to pick apart, it's amazing that the Washington Post actually published it.
This is by far the strangest column Ive read on Senator Ted Cruzs potential he hasnt even announced yet candidacy. Its written by Jennifer Rubin, who basically argues that Cruz is unpopular because hes too extreme. He behaves, she writes, like an angry young man, and is not presidential at all.
The evidence she uses? Hes only polling at 5%, she says, at RealClearPolitics.
OK, so lets look at RCPs poll of polls. And what do we see?
Jeb Bush is supposedly leading the pack which makes me laugh, honestly: the guy is as unpopular among the conservative base as a Republican could possibly be. Hes followed by Christie (9.4%), Huckabee (9%), Paul (8.6%), Carson (8.4%), Walker (5.8%) and Cruz (5.2%). Behind Cruz there are people like the new darling of the establishment, Marco Rubio (4.6%), Rick Perry (4.2%), and Bobby Jindal (2.8%).
Whats most remarkable about this is that Bush, Christie and Huckabee all have problems with the conservative constitutionalist base. Bush and Christie are seen as too moderate (or even downright progressive), whereas the only conservative part of Huckabee is his social conservatism. His record as Arkansas governor made Bill Clinton look conservative in comparison.
Sooner or later the base will turn against these three individuals. They may do fairly well right now, but some if not all of them will be ferociously attacked by conservative activists. Thats going to hurt their poll numbers going forward.
Secondly, although Bush doesnt have national experience as such, he is a former presidents brother and another former presidents son. Hes known very well known and has a national network to work with. The same can be said for Huckabee (after all, he already ran for president twice) and Rand Paul (who simply took over his fathers network). Cruz doesnt have that network yet, but has begun building it. Once that gains traction, hell almost certainly rise in the polls.
Thirdly, although Cruz is chastised by Rubin for being too unpopular to win the nomination because he only polls at 5%, why is it that Scott Walker is considered one of the frontrunners, while he polls 5% as well? The difference between him and Cruz is 0.6%, which is easily within the margin of error.
Fourthly and most hilariously of all, Rubin writes that Cruz will probably have to follow in Rick Perrys footsteps. Perry learned, she explains, to communicate his message in a slightly different (read: less polarizing and downright conservative) manner and that supposedly helped him. I quote:
Maybe the best thing for Cruz would be to run. There is nothing like the verdict of voters in those early states to sober up a politician. Losing is one thing; losing in embarrassing fashion is quite another. Perhaps like Rick Perry he needs that sort of humbling experience to redirect his focus and his approach to politics. If so, that would be to his and Republicans benefit.
If that helped Perry, as Rubin argues, how can she explain that hes only polling at 4.2%, a full percentage lower than Cruz? Hes doing worse than Ted, Jennifer, and that while he actually ran for president once and, therefore, has somewhat of a national organization!
Limited government is “extreme?”
Where Jenn lives I’m sure it is.
We badly need a larger than life character to drown out these RINO ninnies & moderate squishes.
Cruz is the man to do it too.
I agree. I’d like to hear from him more often.
He speaks with clarity, understands all the issues and has the guts to defend conservative principles like the border, marriage, drugs and, defense.
She’s crazy obsessed with Cruz.
And/or she has her marching orders.
In other words, Rubin is merely telling us which of the candidates the left fears most. If it was Walker they feared more than Cruz, both at 5%, the article would be about Scott.
Sounds like Cruz has Beetle-Brows Rubin a little worried.
When has Obama ever acted presidential, even after holding the office for six years?
“Perry learned, she explains, to communicate his message in a slightly different (read: less polarizing and downright conservative) manner and that supposedly helped him.”
Naw, Perry just threw on some hipster glasses thinking it would make him look smarter.
yep.
They fear Cruz and want him out now.
Cruz’s biggest asset and weakness is his self chosen role as the elected Republicans’ chief fire eater.
It was Ghandi who said and I am paraphrasing.
They ignore you, they then ridicule you and then laugh at you and then you win.
The guy’s a fag.
You can’t say he doesn’t have stones. Remember: He was the North American debate champion in both categories. If I were Sweater Vest, Huckleberry or Hipster Glasses, I’d just bow out now.
So far it seems like its a push. He needs to find other ways to get his message out.
Whoever pays Jenn definitely thinks it is, too. Not just the Post, but whoever she answers to in the power structure. She’s THE go-to for the weak-kneed wing of the DC party structure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.