Who posted this. They didn't get my permission. Don't they know who I am?
Posted on 02/10/2015 12:06:32 PM PST by barmag25
Today's America is a scary place for far-right troglodytes, my friends.
It's a place were "teh geys" are allowed to hold hands in public and have matrimonial "butt secks" in their homes without the threat of a public stoning.
It's a place were Shakira Law threatens the very foundations of our nation with telenovelas and tamales.
It's a place where death panels decide weather you'll get an appendectomy, a proctological exam, or a free pass to see the latest in FEMA coffins.
It's a place where our Food Stamp President works ceaselessly to spend our country into back alley bankruptcy, a scary place where we'll all be forced to fellate stained copies of Mao's little red book behind a dumpster filled with aborted babies.
Now the trogs have a new bogeyman to worry about: the Amish.
Except, well, the "Amish" aren't really the Amish. It's just code for a term which far too many right-wingers still wish they could use in public and get away it, and that word is
(Excerpt) Read more at charlestoncitypaper.com ...
I need to update my decoder ring.
and this is posted on our site because why?
Don't forget 'yutes'
Is he a March Haire?
His little screed above is certainly Haire-Brained ...
Has he ever raced a tairtaise?
Well, he probably had to return to the Shire in Middle Earth, and could not continue the dialog.
for a guy who posts ‘biting’ commentary, he sure does not get the sarcastic use of the “Amish”.
Not sure. Just looking at you can tell it was put together by Amish folks. (Amish= code word for Marxist idiots)
Who posted this. They didn't get my permission. Don't they know who I am?
You need one of the new rings...updates are downloadable.
“The well-named Chris Haire...”
Hmmmmm, looks Amish to me.
When I see the word “Amish” used sarcastically on FR I think blacks or Muzzies. The N-word must be this guy’s thought pattern.
You are correct. Its usage comes about when a poster finds it so obvious that the original article or report by the media or other writer has gone to lengths not to describe a perpetrator of a terrible act.
It happens all the time. A Republican anything doing anything is reported as a Republican, or a conservative activist even if their political affiliation has nothing to do with the event. The same for someone of a Christian religious denomination or anyone from the media portrayed "privileged class."
A democrat wrong doer has such information buried in the end of the write up or not given at all. When a perpetrator of a criminal act is not even described as short, male, white, senior citizen, of apparently local ethnic heritage it shows that the writer is using a style demand cover up to not make the story fully inform the reader and Amish is used to point up that obvious exclusion.
OK ... I looked. It’s not quite as hideous as the Washington City Paper. It did publish what is easily the stupidest critical review of “American Sniper” that I have yet seen. The critically idiotic critic clearly saw the film, and just as clearly completely missed the point. Repeatedly. How can anyone be so damn dumb?
I just did a FR search on keyword “amish” and got a mixed bag list of bad actors of many colors and flavors...
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/amish/index?tab=articles
The article is BS.
It’s not a code word for anything. It’s a sarcastic remark, a ridiculous label for anybody who does anything a peace-loving, God-fearing group would not be involved in. That’s not the same as a code word.
Even “Holder’s people” is more sarcasm than code word: a reminder of what our chief law-enforcement appointee thinks.
We don’t use code words the way racists do. That is an insult. The words are political commentary on the general scene, which is quite different.
As everyone on FR knows.
Liberalism is a mental disorder. It makes smart people say dumb things.
This demented author’s post-apocalyptic world feared by conservatives has actually come to pass if you replace Mao’s book with the koran.
Is that the older, hirsute brother of Pajama Boy? He's got the smirk that's common of so many leftists that I can't quite tell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.