Posted on 02/02/2015 8:52:31 AM PST by george76
Libyan officials were deeply concerned in 2011, as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was trying to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power, that weapons were being funneled to NATO-backed rebels with ties to al Qaeda, fearing that well-armed insurgents could create a safe haven for terrorists .. The reports included a 16-page list of weapons .
...
the Qataris, they are doing this with every country, with every country,” Mr. Gadhafi said. “This is their plan, I mean in public. This is their own agenda. I mean, it’s not something hidden,
...
A lot of jihadists that had been locked up by the regime were released after the revolution started. They picked up many of the guns that were coming into the country and fought, but they were not fighting for democracy — they were fighting their own revolution, trying to build a state based on a vicious, violent, radical, Islamic ideology.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
It was the birth of ISIS (whom the creators call ISIL)
and savage rapine and death — using US taxpayer money.
The Sunni Moslem terrorists apparently received at least 400 - maybe thousands - of ground to air missiles that could bring down an airliner - like TWA 800 over New York or the Jordian fighter jet over the Islamic State.
Here’s what I don’t get. OK.... Valerie and Obama are Muslims, or might as well be. But Hillary? She’s just a power mad, deluded politician, a Methodist I’ve heard. Is she just stupid and manipulated by the ValJar/Obama clique, or did she also see some value in ISIS?
When Moammar Gadhafi is sane in comparison to your own leadership, your country has problems.
Yep. I have family members who are that stupid, too. After I pointed out the rise of terrorism since Obama’s election, my brother said ‘but it’s not Obama’s fault’. I said “WHOSE FAULT IS IT? IF BUSH WAS STILL PRESIDENT IT WOULD SURE AS H*** BE HIS FAULT’. I suspect my brother was about ready to explain to me why it was, in fact, Bush’s fault that terrorism has exploded since 2008. (no pun intended)
Can, can, we all just co-exist?
'"There would be Islamic jihad in front of you, in the Mediterranean," he said. "(Osama) bin Laden's people would come to impose ransoms on land and sea. We will go back to the time of Red Beard, of pirates, Ottomans imposing ransoms on boats."'
The Islamic Jihad and Islamic slavery started in the 7th Century.
Not Bush’s fault.
Her connections to Qatar and other terrorist dictators - large money and more - go deep since Bubba was POTUS.
Second, Huma’s family help start and run the Muslim Brotherhhod.
He was a crazy dictator.
One goal of the Arab Spring was to remove all the dictators ( Egypt, Syria .. ) and replace them all with an Islamic caliphate = the Levant.
Where did Qadaffi’s fortune go?
Hillary is a murdering, thieving liar.
I would opine that the biggest part of it ended up in Hillary's pocket.
They, Obama worshipers, Clinton worshipers, Democrat Party members will go to their graves believing that. Anyone who tries to present facts to them is just wasting their time.
Several theories where his gold went thru several hands.
One is it passed thru Ukraine, then to Germany / Holland as the Fed lost / sold the Germany / Dutch tons of gold.
Qatar... thanks... funding. That’s geopolitical, and we know that the Clintons are willing to give up a lot in that area for personal/political gain. Witness the Loral and other guidance technology transfer to China, and that idiot (I forget her name) who said that Los Alamos should be an “open facility” and gave tours to Chicoms et al.
Huma... ahhhh Huma. How could I forget. The tongue of doom.
That still paints Hillary as a dumb, self-centered, power hungry b**ch who doesn’t realize what she’s giving away, rather than a Muslim. But, then again, what’s the difference—acts like a duck, etc.
I would opine that the biggest part of it ended up in Hillary’s pocket.
* * *
Wow. That’s a thought I hadn’t had before. It’s true the Clintons will steal anything that’s not nailed down. If Hillary was “on the take” in one way or another, that gives her powerful, powerful incentive never to let the truth of Benghazi see the light of day.
They were in favor of deposing the Shah, and now they are in favor of normalizing relations with the Castros in Cuba. Same with Qadaffi and Mubarak in Egypt. What follows in getting rid of the US allies is always chaos.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.