Wonder if they are going to vote as to whether their is a fist up their back side directing most of their moves against the American people.
Happening and impacting the planet are two different things.
The climate is constantly changing. Man has no control over that.
Global warming always finished last of importance to people in poll after poll.
Bring it on!
Well, now, finally a more scientific approach to an invented problem.
...Overwhelming “consensus” of PSEUDO-scientists. THE COMPUTER MODELS PREDICTING CATASTROPHE ARE WRONG!! Any respectable scientist would throw them out and start over.
He’d be better off requesting a vote on who believes in climate stasis.
Apparently the Al Gore crowd does, because they’re the ones who are always wringing their hands over climate change, despite the fact that the climate always changes and always will be changing.
Now if the question is “Does human activity have a significant affect on the climate?” that’s something completely different. I’d be surprised if any senator has the technical background to address that question in an intelligent fashion. Certainly Al Gore and almost everyone in the media doesn’t.
This is satire, right?
The Senate surely has actual business to conduct.
Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]Dear Administrator Jackson:
I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called "Endangerment Finding."
It has been often said that the "science is settled" on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.
The letter is s, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements.
Alternatively, one may ask which one of the twenty-some models settled the science so that all the rest could be discarded along with the research funds that have kept those models alive.
We can take this further. Not a single climate model predicted the current cooling phase. If the science were settled, the model (singular) would have predicted it.
(excerpted from Professor Hayden's letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency. More at link.)
They will vote YES for Global Warming/Cooling(at same time)
Meaningless. Everything they do is meaningless.
And those who are able should be allowed to walk upright.
Boner is well named.
STUPID!!! ALERT!!!
You do NOT vote on TRUTH, it is either True or not but it is not something you VOTE on. IE Science goal is to seek out TRUTH! Thus you can not VOTE and make it so!
By the way Man Made Global Warming is about CONTROL and NOTHING more!!! It has NOTHING to do with the TRUTH!
I hope they round off PI too!
And they could save us a lot of money by raising the speed of light so our computers would run faster.
I say let the committed Socialist add his amendment, but then add another: “Do you agree with the 35,000 scientists who say that the current world temperatures are a result of natural processes and do not require catastrophic control by the government to dictate things that won’t change the temperatures anyway?”
If they vote yes, does that mean it is?
Amend the Laws of Thermodynamics!
While they’re at it, I think they should vote to make Pi equal to 3.0. Think of how much easier that would be to remember!
You don't have to be a scientist to understand that climate change impacts the planet. Of course it does. Our presence on Earth more than likely has a negative impact as well. This is not the issue.
It takes a socialist to cherry pick data and selectively choose quotes from scientists