To: bert
P.S. The term "prisoner of war" has no meaning unless the person in question is from a foreign nation that has had a formal declaration of war against it, approved by Congress.
I'll even go so far as to suggest that a government that declares an idiotic "War on Terror" against nobody in particular, thereby making every human being on the planet a potential "prisoner of war," has no legitimacy whatsoever.
To: Alberta's Child
I get it..... you like the ascension of the lawyers intent on destroying the country
17 posted on
12/30/2014 5:23:32 AM PST by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
To: Alberta's Child
Congress did approve the war.
Perhaps they didn't use the constitutionally mandated turn of phrase to do so, oh wait, the Constitution doesn't mandate any particular wording to authorize military force.
*BLUSH* *nevermind*
23 posted on
12/30/2014 5:56:55 AM PST by
null and void
(Will the obama love story be called Broke Barack Mountin' or The Love That Dare Not Say Hussein?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson