Posted on 12/20/2014 5:41:28 PM PST by presidio9
Theres been a lot of chatter about a potential challenger to Hillary Clintons campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. And thus far, there has only been one viable contender. But if U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren has made one thing clear, it is that Warren is not running for president.
Semantics dont always mean a lot in politics. Take ol Dick Nixon: I am not a crook. Or Bill Clinton: I did not have sexual relations with that woman. Both ostensible lies. But Warren seemed pretty clear in her interview with Steve Inskeep Monday morning.
Inskeep: Sen. Warren, as you must know, that even as you were fighting over this in the Senate, there was a group called Ready for Warren that wants you to run for president, that released a letter signed by more than 300 people who describe themselves as former Obama campaign workers and staffers and aides. They want you to run. What do you say to them?
Warren: Im not running for president. Thats not what were doing. We had a really important fight in the United States Congress just this past week. And Im putting all my energy into that fight and to what happens after this.
Inskeep: Would you tell these independent groups, Give it up! Youre just never going to run.
Warren: I told them, Im not running for president.
Inskeep: Youre putting that in the present tense, though. Are you never going to run?
Warren: I am not running for president.
Inskeep: Youre not putting a never on that.
Warren: I am not running for president. You want me to put an exclamation point at the end?
So, okay. That clears things up, right? But media analysts persist in picking Warrens language apart, clinging to the fact that she never completely ruled out any presidential bids. And thats fine. Warren isnt obligated to sign on to any future plans, but the nebulous nature of anything beyond 2016 keeps her name in the hat, which is a smart political move.
But there is a fair point in her language. She has only positioned herself to say that she is not currently running for president, not that she wouldnt announce something even for the next election cycle. I dont think thats her plan, though. Even though Warren isnt afraid of going head-to-head with people in her own party, going up against Clinton would be an uphill battle. Current Democratic polls have Clinton far-and-above her next imagined opponent, which is Warren, by a 51.4 percent spread.
Warren running, while putting two great candidates in the ring for the Democrats, would needlessly split votes for Clinton. The major benefit that Democrats have for 2016 is that they have a clear-cut choice for their candidate, and they can begin building that base way before the primaries. The Republicans, on the other hand, have a few candidates with weak support. Theyre currently fragmented in their choice for a nominee, which is the political equivalent of *shrug* Thisll do.
Still, I dont even think thats the big deterrent to Warren running in 2016. As she mentioned in her interview with NPR, Warren has some big fish to fry in the Senate. Shes taking on Wall Street reform above and beyond what her own party has even imagined. She opposed an omnibus spending bill, which received bipartisan support because it loosened the regulations to the fat cats she wants to fight. Bringing down Wall Street is going to happen overnight, and it doesnt seem as if Warren is willing to let her work go unfinished. In the Senate, she can continue that battle. From the Oval Office? If Obamas administration has shown us anything, it is that she will be able to do little more than express her wishes and wait.
I think it behooves both Clinton and Warren for Clinton to step up to the plate for Democrats in 2016. Meanwhile, Warren can spend more time in the Senate, making friends, proving her effectiveness, and getting ready to be able to coax action out of a gridlocked Congress. Not to say that Clinton is free of those same challenges, but she has certainly spent way more time shaking hands than Warren, who was elected to the Senate in 2013.
I believe Warren when she says she isnt running for president. And for the Democrats sake, I hope its true.
Actually, it’s good news for all who wish to avoid hearing her icepick-frequency shrill voice on a frequent basis.
Miss Congeniality.
She is lying, of course (one highly suspects).
By minimizing her run now, she (hopefully, in her mind) minimizes investigation into her background; and, let's the hapless Hillary be the current Dem (figurative) lighting rod.
One strongly suspects that the "fix" for Warren is in, and Hillary will learn that there really is no honor among thieves.
.
Paleface speak with forked tongue.
Run Elizabeth Run!
She’s running.
This is her only chance, she’s 65.
It’s going to be epic.
yeah b/c after all we elect people to the senate so they can go there and “make friends”.
/s
“I believe Warren when she says she isnt running for president. And for the Democrats sake, I hope its true.”
Shut up, Abby!!!
Run Lizzy run!!!!!!!!
The Cherokee Nation is deeply saddened.
The squaw wont’s to be drafted.
At any point in the future all she has to say is: “I wasn’t running then, I am now.”
And even if, it’d be a lost cause for Granny Warren.
She’s running. She needs a listening tour first.
I sense there is a torrential backlash coming against 8 years of arrogant, incompetent, anti-American far left policies that can sweep a real conservative into office.
As Reagan said, don’t paint with pale pastels. Make our differences sharp and contrasting. Give Americans a real choice.
Oh, and screw the media.
I'm more more hopeful now too. For years we've been told the demographics would wipe us out, and yet last month we not only survived, we kicked butt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.