Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: Decision not to indict NYPD officer 'totally incomprehensible'
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/12/03/krauthammer-decision-not-to-indict-nypd-officer-totally-incomprehensible/ ^

Posted on 12/03/2014 8:58:20 PM PST by TigerClaws

Charles Krauthammer said Wednesday on "Special Report with Bret Baier" that a grand jury's decision not to indict a New York City police officer in the death of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man who died in July after the officer placed him in a chokehold, is "totally incomprehensible."

"It looks like they at least might have indicted him on something like involuntary manslaughter at the very least," Krauthammer, a syndicated columnist and Fox News contributor, said. "The guy was unarmed, and the crime was petty as they come. He was selling loose cigarettes, which in and of itself is almost absurd that somebody has to die over that."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: ericgarner; excessiveforce; manslaughter; pantaleo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 461-476 next last
To: Uncle Miltie
The poor guy in new York was selling loose cigarettes and was threatening nobody, and was killed for it for No Reason. Think. Discern.

The guy in NY wasn't killed for selling loose cigarettes. That's like saying Brown was killed for walking in the middle of the street.

That's absurd.

Think. Discern.

101 posted on 12/03/2014 10:23:29 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: chris37

I absolutely agree!


102 posted on 12/03/2014 10:23:57 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“Pretty soon it’s all over town that folks can sell cigarettes on the street with impunity.”

The horror...the horror...

People should be free to sell their own damned cigarettes without the government demanding a piece of the action.

L


103 posted on 12/03/2014 10:24:14 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I don’t know, this seems to say otherwise:

“Members of the New York City Police Department will NOT use chokeholds. A chokehold shall include, but is not limited to, any pressure to the throat or windpipe, which may prevent or hinder breathing or reduce intake of air.”

New York Police Department Patrol Guide, 2004 Edition

http://www.pbs.org/pov/everymothersson/special_nypd_force.php


104 posted on 12/03/2014 10:25:00 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
George Washington, in his last address to the country warned that 'law was raw force'. Here it is on display for anyone who will see. This is a crying shame that this man died. Yes, he raised his hands in disobedience to the officers. Then 4 or 5 men took him down. The fellow who performed the rear naked choke had his forearm sunk in deep. The force of the police was not going to be denied or negotiated. They would do what was necessary for the city of New York to collect the $6 tax per pack of cigarettes. And all the while the officials in Washington steal trillions from the taxpayers. All the while the investment bankers rip off the public monies and not a word is said.

Damn I hate to go against law enforcement, but on this one, they were wrong.

This is possibly going to be the ignition of far worse things to come in this country.

105 posted on 12/03/2014 10:25:14 PM PST by Texas Songwriter (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I’m getting tired of hearing people say this guy couldn’t breath.

If you are talking out loud you can breath.

It takes air going in and out of your throat, your vocal chords, and mouth and tongue to speak.

No air......no sound.


106 posted on 12/03/2014 10:25:42 PM PST by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

It’s always about money and power! It’s a political thing and not party specific.


107 posted on 12/03/2014 10:26:11 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Both brown and garner would be alive if police showed civility too. Why do cops always get confrontational rather than conversational?

If a young thug reaches into your patrol car and attempts to take your gun away, I think a cop can be excused for becoming "confrontational".

108 posted on 12/03/2014 10:27:22 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Strange there were 6 Cops and not one tazer

Tasers kill more people resisting arrest than submission holds do.

At least I recall several deaths in NYC from tasers. I don't for submission holds.

Tasering Garner certainly would have been risky given his health.

109 posted on 12/03/2014 10:28:43 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

He was breathing. Speech is reliant on air moving in and out of lungs.

If he could say “I can’t breathe” he was breathing.


110 posted on 12/03/2014 10:28:49 PM PST by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

These sections also seem to be relevant:

“Whenever possible, members should make every effort to avoid tactics, such as sitting or standing on a subject’s chest, which may result in chest compression, thereby reducing the subject’s ability to breathe.”

“If a person appears to be having difficulty breathing or is otherwise demonstrating life-threatening symptoms, medical assistance will be requested immediately. The patrol supervisor will direct that alternate means to maintain custody be utilized, if appropriate.”


111 posted on 12/03/2014 10:28:55 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Lurker, I’ll come back tomorrow. I have to go now.

Take care.


112 posted on 12/03/2014 10:29:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (GOP. GOPe. GOPeGads! GOPeWWWWWWWWWWWWW...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

I agree. There’s just no reason to have six cops take a guy down like that under these circumstances.
It’s either comply or die. Why the need to force a deadly or even just a potentially deadly situation here?
It makes no sense to me.


113 posted on 12/03/2014 10:29:41 PM PST by Clump ( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: laplata

No, he isn’t.

Anyone can see quite clearly by comparing the picture of the cop and man to the two choke holds that I posted that the cop wasn’t choking him at all. Not even a little bit.

The dude died from his own weight.

That’s why they didn’t indict the officer.


114 posted on 12/03/2014 10:30:15 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

I was going by the Police Chief’s statement of last night referencing wooden batons.

I have to go now. If you wish to respond I’ll reply tomorrow.

Take care.


115 posted on 12/03/2014 10:31:16 PM PST by DoughtyOne (GOP. GOPe. GOPeGads! GOPeWWWWWWWWWWWWW...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: chris37

....”The dude died from his own weight”....

Even if so...the guy kept telling them he couldn’t breath many times over....so the Grand Jury had to have something we are not privy to.


116 posted on 12/03/2014 10:34:08 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

It wasn’t a choke hold.

See post 69 if you want to see a choke hold.


117 posted on 12/03/2014 10:34:58 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Tasering Garner certainly would have been risky given his health.

Same result though, and we wouldn't be having this discussion either had the cop(s) used a taser.

Tasers kill more people resisting arrest than submission holds do.

No argument there, but I will bet you anything that there are a lot of cops tonight re- thinking their options in a capture scenario, just for their own protection.

118 posted on 12/03/2014 10:35:13 PM PST by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

By all means please do..


119 posted on 12/03/2014 10:35:34 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

It wasn’t choke hold.

See post 69 if you want to see what a choke hold looks like.


120 posted on 12/03/2014 10:36:52 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 461-476 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson