Posted on 11/12/2014 10:56:19 AM PST by Lazamataz
Russian propaganda. Based on simple physics, it’s 100X more likely that a ship could fry a close-by passing jet than the other way around, due to vastly greater power and much bigger arrays.
The part about 27 crew trying to quit? Pure Russian propaganda.
Shhhsssshhh. . .not supposed to say that. . .
And you expect us to believe a quack?
And there are plenty of morons who believe it, even here at FR.
In other words, surprisingly light for their size.
It’s complete bullshit.
EMP. Scary!
Dayum.
Of course, if mine shrank two more inches, I would officially become a woman.
Thanks bro. Your opinion I trust.
“ased on simple physics, its 100X more likely that a ship could fry a close-by passing jet than the other way around, due to vastly greater power and much bigger arrays.”
The Aegis could microwave cook the pilot in his metal craft, if the EWO was so inclined.
Probably a lot of propaganda in this. But don’t forget, that before WWII, we denigrated the ability of the Japanese to fight us. In reality, they came up with a superior fighter (Zero),
more modern ships, much better torpedos, etc.—while we were stuck with outmoded and sometimes non-functioning weapons systems.
(And, they captured Singapore, which was thought to be unconquerable.)
Maybe the Russians aren’t 10 feet tall, but it is best to assume that they aren’t midgets, either; and be prepared to meet them.
That brings to mind the Russian propaganda about the Ukrainian flagship’s captain and crew agreeing to surrender when they returned to their home port of Sevastopol after returning from a NATO exercise.
Somehow the captain and crew must not have been in on the agreement. When they returned they put in at Odessa instead going to the Crimea.
I suspect the Cook went dark and did not light up the Russian bomber when it approached. No reason to give intel for free.
Our captain once got a Russian warship to activate their fire control radar. Lots of congrats after that.
Do you really believe in this pitiful attempt at propaganda? I have worked on Combat Systems and various Intel Systems as a contractor for the Navy and the NSGA and I can tell you that article is a bunch of BS.
Meh. Look up the EC-130H Compass Call. I flew on ‘em over 20 years ago. If anything emits a signal, it can be jammed.
My guess is that if the Russkies have it we have it also. We probably just keep it quiet.
The fix for this is to fire upon detection.
But it's a terrible fix.
Kinda like MAD.
So do I. Presently. For the USS Donald Duck. We're flipping out over here.
Laz
No sh!t?
Did the systems come back up after the aircraft left, or were they permanently damaged?
http://web.debka.com/newsupdate/7877/printversion
Is it just possible the ship shut down the E systems to prevent the plane from gaining detailed intel on them?
The calculus for sinking a US Warship at Sea always comea down to this:
Are you willing to trade Nuclear Weapons with the USA?
So far, nobody is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.