Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Worried GOP Congress Will Actually Pass Legislation ['They're gonna send bills up to...' Obama]
MRC.org (Media Research Center) ^ | Nov. 5, 2014

Posted on 11/06/2014 4:26:23 PM PST by Colofornian

On Wednesday's CBS This Morning, co-host Norah O'Donnell fretted that the newly elected Republican Congress would dare to pass legislation: "If you look at a number of these new senators, they're quite conservative. Why wouldn't they go along with what Rand Paul has said? They're gonna send bills up to the President, as he told Charlie Rose last night, 'We're going to keep sending bills up to the President and we'll see whether the President wants to work with us or not.' Is the President going to be forced to veto a bunch of bills?"

In response, political director John Dickerson had to give O'Donnell a brief lesson on the Constitution: "Yeah, but that's okay. That's the way it's supposed to work....the way they designed this whole American system was you could send them up, they get vetoed, then you have a conversation, you fix it, and then something goes through."

(Excerpt) Read more at mrc.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; cbs; congress; demagogicparty; memebuilding; norahodonnell; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; seebs; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
From the piece:

On Wednesday's CBS This Morning, co-host Norah O'Donnell fretted that the newly elected Republican Congress would dare to pass legislation: "If you look at a number of these new senators, they're quite conservative. Why wouldn't they go along with what Rand Paul has said? They're gonna send bills up to the President, as he told Charlie Rose last night, 'We're going to keep sending bills up to the President and we'll see whether the President wants to work with us or not.' Is the President going to be forced to veto a bunch of bills?" In response, political director John Dickerson had to give O'Donnell a brief lesson on the Constitution: "Yeah, but that's okay. That's the way it's supposed to work....the way they designed this whole American system was you could send them up, they get vetoed, then you have a conversation, you fix it, and then something goes through."

Oh, no! Crisis of crises!

Without Harry Reid the bottlenecker, who will be there as the gatekeeper to actually keep a bill from reaching Obama's desk???

CBS is in a panic!

1 posted on 11/06/2014 4:26:23 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Oh the horrors. Passing bills that CBS and their liberal ilk don’t like.


2 posted on 11/06/2014 4:27:44 PM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

I see no problem with oDonnels question. What am I missing?


3 posted on 11/06/2014 4:29:19 PM PST by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
(Why would Dickerson have to give her an on-air Constitutional lesson about how that's the way the process works)

There's nothing unusual...unique...threatening...problematic...about Congress putting together bills and sending them to the President. Happens every year...every month Congress convenes...Oh...except on days where Harry Reid bottled them up these past years...and they never reached Obama as a matter of course...what did I read? Something like 359 such bills???

4 posted on 11/06/2014 4:33:48 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

It seemed like a question. I am missing it too.


5 posted on 11/06/2014 4:36:04 PM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Really dirty rumor going also around that pilots might just FLY..!

Taxi drivers might get uppity and just DRIVE, ya know..?

VERY worrisome..!!


6 posted on 11/06/2014 4:37:01 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Horror of horrors! Obama is going to have to do some work signing bills now. How will he find time to get in a golf game? Handling crises is so much on him already, now he has to sign bills?!!!!!!!/s


7 posted on 11/06/2014 4:39:11 PM PST by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

8 posted on 11/06/2014 4:41:16 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Hey, without that obstructionist Democrat controlled senate, do you think there’s a chance of an Obama budget finally passing? ;)


9 posted on 11/06/2014 4:42:44 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Howzabout photo ID (or biometric) for federal elections - just like Mexico


10 posted on 11/06/2014 4:47:44 PM PST by gasport (Will you children please close the damn door?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; be-baw; hawkaw; gaijin; From The Deer Stand
"Is the President going to be forced to veto a bunch of bills?"

Good question. The answer is "NO." The President is not going to be forced to veto a bunch a bills. He can simply sign them.

11 posted on 11/06/2014 4:50:06 PM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Remember the outrage when President Bush proceeded to do exactly what he promised while campaigning?


12 posted on 11/06/2014 4:51:26 PM PST by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

You’re accepting MRCs assertion that O’Donnell needed schooling. I still see nothing wrong with her question. There’re many more and better media bias examples than this one.


13 posted on 11/06/2014 4:51:56 PM PST by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Norah’s knee pads are starting to fray.


14 posted on 11/06/2014 4:52:20 PM PST by Iron Munro (“EARBOLA” – the nausea one gets when hearing the sound of Barack Obama 's voice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; expat_panama; Lurkina.n.Learnin

LOL

Funny comment. HeHeHe!!!!


15 posted on 11/06/2014 4:52:38 PM PST by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu; SWAMPSNIPER; Waryone

We’re entering dark scary territory here. The Republicans are actually going to pass a budget. This is something Democrats are not familiar with. I suggest that they be assigned to special training sessions and get counseling so that they are not upset when it happens.


16 posted on 11/06/2014 4:53:43 PM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

To everyone who whines that government is broken, this is the way to fix it. Congress needs to vote, vote, and vote some more. It will finally be the case that the Alinskyite prince can not vote “present.”

Republicans, too, must be courageous and send many votes to the floor.


17 posted on 11/06/2014 4:56:56 PM PST by MilesVeritatis (Devote yourself to the truth, no matter where it leads you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
This has been the dirty 4 year secret. Obama has been able to frame the GOP House as “do nothing” and the media has had no problem not reporting who the real “do nothing” is. It has enabled the petty little narcissist in the WH to claim he has to use Executive Orders because he can't get Congress to do anything for the American people.

Shameful lies, all of it. Reid may be pissed now because he lost his do nothing job, but he shamed his job as senate leader in order to protect Obama from being seen as the real culprit for the fact that America is in decline.

18 posted on 11/06/2014 5:00:18 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

That means bh0 will have to make a decision to sign or veto the bills that are passed by Republican controlled house and senate. He won’t have Hairy Reid as a roadblock making sure bh0 doesn’t have to make a decision on signing a bill. He will no longer be able to be a pretend president who wants only to “vote present” without making any decision harder than to go golfing in the morning or in the afternoon.


19 posted on 11/06/2014 5:02:54 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

There’s a reason Obama has vetoed only two bills in the last 6 years and that is Harry Reed’s refusal to let any bill Obama doesn’t like get through the Senate.

The vetoes will come “fast and furious” now.


20 posted on 11/06/2014 5:13:23 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. Eccl 12 V.13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson