Dimocrats tend to be fair weather voters. Love the rainy and raw for Chicagoland.
Posted on 10/31/2014 7:47:01 PM PDT by lightman
Dimocrats tend to be fair weather voters. Love the rainy and raw for Chicagoland.
Democrats don’t have cars. Sucks for them.
Bad weather can be an advantage for those who get a lot of early voters. In recent years, that would be the RATs.
I walked down to the post office in a downpour this morning. The polling place is directly across the street.
Washington State has mail-in ballots. Who cares what the weather is?
Propaganda! From a weather page. Can’t be any more in-your-face.
“Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.”
My co-workers and I were joking that we should hang outside the polling place and intimidate the Dem voters. We’d wear our suits, Rolex watches, and carry a rolled up Wall St Journal ;-)
Weather won’t matter to rat voters on Nov. 4th, everybody knows republicans vote on November 4th. democrat voters poll date is Wed. November 5th.
(pass the word)
If the coverage of the cold, rainy swath projected over southeast Michigan pans out on election day, it could provide some slight boost to Republican prospects. I would guess that 75% or so of Michigan’s hard-core dems reside in the rainy, cold area (Flint, Lansing, Detroit, Pontiac, Ann Arbor, etc.) The rest of Michigan -— the portion of the state likely to be cool but clear -— is considerably more conservative and hospitable to GOP candidates.
RAIN RAIN RAIN in Chicago. Please rain, rain heavily. Stay inside little dhimmis, stay inside.
I watched the Ice Cream Farmer debate Durbin. The moderators and Durbin mopped him up. May he never run again.
It could be raining broken glass and it wouldn’t
keep me from voting the dems OUT.
Me too.
I grew up in a household where you went to Church on Sunday and to the polls on Tuesday, and it didn’t matter what the weather or if you “felt” like it—you went. Period.
I watched a little of the debate, I couldn’t stand it.
In this climate I honestly think we may have had half a chance to win (or a least some nice false hope) if Truax had been nominated instead of Uberdouche. UGH!
I watched a bit of the Chicago Tribune debate for AG between RAT Lisa Madigan and Republican Paul Schimpf. He was kicking butt and repeatedly hammered home the fact that she looks the other way at corruption in this state.
However, the moderator at the “conservative” Trib was so biased that he openly started the debate by gushing about what a GREAT governor Lisa would make and how “unfortunate” it is that she isn’t running.
Reinforced why I gloat about the Trib’s bankruptcy. The sooner the Koch bros. buy that liberal rag and make leftist heads explode, the better.
If I were a candidate I would not agree to debate without approving the moderator and all question askers, the bias is heavy and obvious.
Zero state leg gains for the GOP? Is that accurate? What a disaster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.