Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

Which state? I don’t recognize the initiative - Other than that is, as stated above, deliberately criminal-inducing.


4 posted on 10/30/2014 10:31:57 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Washington State.


6 posted on 10/30/2014 10:32:18 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (I'M WITH CRUZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The law required undefined “transfers” to go though FFL screening.

So if my father in law hands me his unloaded heirloom gun to inspect in the living room, we are both felons.


8 posted on 10/30/2014 10:34:04 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (I'M WITH CRUZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Washington state. They have an opposing initiative 591 which is the opposite of 594. What happens if the both pass? Odd circumstance. Sadly, the Seattle area will weigh heavily on the outcome.


9 posted on 10/30/2014 10:39:10 AM PDT by rktman ("The only thing dumber than a brood hen is a New York democrat." Mother Abagail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson