I happen to be a research scientist with a lot of education and experience in this area. I have never said anything that is not supported in the scientific literature, and I am always willing to provide references to back up anything I say. The information I have provided on mode of transmission is absolutely accurate, and supported by research.
The thing about the scientific world, is that we constantly discuss how things are done, and if they could be done better. We always try to improve things. Ebola really has not significantly changed, but what is clear when a situation like Dallas comes up and two nurses infect themselves is that communication, education, whatever, fell down somewhere along the way. The protocols are sound, people have been responding to Ebola outbreaks for decades without getting infected. So, when a couple of nurses get infected, we need to understand what went wrong so as to prevent it from happening again.
The so-called elites at CDC who put forth the protocols do so in conjunction with the Ebola experts--you know, those people at the research institutions who work with it on a daily basis.
Heck of a job Brownie!
Protocols can exist, but overburdening and exhaustion have a tendency to produce a weakening of one’s ability to accurately carry them out. I am well aware of what the CDC is saying, but it doesn’t appear to me at all that they even so much as care about what the real truth is on ebola. These people are extremely delusional and fringe or not, they are using supposedly trustworthy sources to throw information around. The problem I have is that people sit around talking about how the rules are so perfect, while sitting in an ivory tower.
“two nurses infect themselves” ????????????????
Damn poor choice of words IMO. What is that conclusion based on?
Apparently, the CDC decided their early guidance was not sufficient, because they changed it.