Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republican Wildcat
We can still have a majority without McCockle.

If he goes I won't shed a tear.

4 posted on 10/25/2014 11:02:04 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

The posers are back - claiming the only solution is to get as many ultra-liberals elected as possible, including a huge boost to the Lundergans so they can use their new found power to take over everything...again.

Such “true conservatives” - communism or bust for them.


10 posted on 10/25/2014 11:14:23 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A McConnell loss will be worse for the Democrats than a McConnell win.


16 posted on 10/25/2014 11:29:44 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“We can still have a majority without McCockle.”

The problem is that voters in other states may also think that about their senators. I’m thinking of Cochran in NC. I’m not a fan of him or McConnell. If it were up to me they would both be replaced by true conservatives. But if it were up to me, I’d probably also vote for them instead of their dem opponents.

The problem is that no matter how many Republicans win Senate seats in this election, the conservatives will still be a tiny minority.


32 posted on 10/25/2014 1:12:24 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson