Posted on 10/23/2014 9:52:36 AM PDT by raptor22
Voter Fraud: As early voting begins in the Land of Lincoln, President Obama casts his ballot and a Republican state senator voting for himself finds that his ballot was counted for his opponent. Eric Holder, call your office.
The day after resigning as attorney General, Eric Holder told the Congressional Black Caucus that the voter ID laws he and his Justice Department opposed were answers to a problem that "doesn't exist." Yet when President Obama left the golf course Monday to vote early in his home state of Illinois, he was asked to present his ID before casting his ballot.
Upon casting his early ballot, Alex Wagner, the MSNBC anchor and wife of White House chef Sam Kass, opined that Obama was doing "something that almost a half million Texas residents may no longer be able to do this election cycle."
She was upset the U.S. Supreme Court "at five in the morning on Saturday . . . decided to allow Texas to enforce its strict voter ID law in the November elections."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...
Same thing happened on the first two judges I voted for (Kansas). Had to hit it about 3 times before it would “uncheck” and let me recheck. Only had trouble on the first two.
Is a calibration error like not tightening a drive belt with the correct tension? Are all votes are therefore subject to variations in outcome?
Maybe we should go back to paper ballots.
Better yet, on voting day, everyone voting for a President stands in one room based on their choice. Then they are all let out at the same time and counted as they leave. No one can go into any room after the counting begins. As you leave, you are given purple ink on your thumb that comes off in one week.
All voting at the same time. No early voting.
ID for each person voting to prove citizenship and residency address.
Vote counts posted immediately and at the same time.
I’m concerned about turnout in my area.
Last time, here in lily-white Appalachia, we had huge black union thugs “watching the polls”.
[and giving the stink-eye to us all]
My polling place is not within walking distance of anywhere...except the next door small truck stop and I watched lots of Holder’s people walking up the road to the poll.
My theory is that buses were parked way back in the truck lot where it’s dark.
It was surrealistic.
Elderly people and women may not even show up, this time.
And what is the RNC going to do about this electoral fraud?
Can you say, “nothing”?
Dammit! Get it right people. That is NOT NOT NOT voter fraud. That is ELECTION fraud. You wanna save the Republic then it is WAY past time, and almost too late, to get on that bandwagon. While we sit her wringing hands on “voter fraud” (and I as a Prosecutor am not at all convinced it is of any significance) we may very well have thousands to hundreds of thousands of votes being switched with these electronic voting machines with no paper trail.
Why voter fraud (which is VERY difficult to pull off in large numbers) when with the flip of the switch you can change 100k votes?
Quite frankly, I am stunned Conservatives (ESPECIALLY our Conservative “leaders”) are doing absolutely nothing about this.
>> NOT A PIXEL CALIBRATION ERROR. IT IS FRAUD
I *might* believe “error” if these so-called “calibraton errors” resulted in a mis-vote for the OPPONENT of the ‘rat approximately half the time.
But I don’t recall even one time when that happened, let alone half the time. These mysterious “errors” ALWAYS tally more votes for the ‘rat.
Always.
Obama looked even more surprised than me when he one in 12 - LOL
have Norm Coleman ask for donations?
I’m guessing that even if that much ‘calibration’ flexibility is even possible that local Democrat Elections Clerks have figured out which way to miscalibrate them based on where the particular vote options fall out on the screen...
Two things I’ve always gone by: 1) If you give a doctor (or hospital) enough time and money he will eventually kill you, and 2) Democrats will ALWAYS cheat in elections - it is their way./
Calibration is when you adjust your barometer to conform to a known accurate reading. This is not calibration. They really take people for fools!
I’m surprised they didn’t call it a computer glitch.
Looks good on the surface, but I immediately could tell it’s been faked up. The a$$ on that girl ain’t a double wide.
I would think that one of the very first things an election worker would do when setting up a touch-screen voting machine is to run an alignment check against the ballot locations. I’m sure this capability is built in to the machines.
Even if the on-site election workers don’t have the capability to *change* the calibration, I’m certain they have the ability to *check* the calibration.
Therefore I’m astonished that that degree of mis-calibration could even be present in the machine when the first real voter stepped up to it.
...UNLESS it was deliberate, that is.
What do you think vote fraud is?
Playing word games doesn’t change what it is.
But you have a problem when Dems get exposed.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3218214/posts?page=3#3
The check boxes for Democrats cover 99.99999% of the screen ,you have to find the Pixel that gives you the vote GOP
IBD EDITORIAL PIING
This is kinda’ off topic but shouldn’t those screens be cleaned with a antibacteria cloth after each use?
With the viruses that are going around, it seems to me, it should be required.
IBD EDITORIAL PING
I can’t stand these stories - fraud is found, NOTHING is done. Jail everyone involved, nullify the election, get voter IDs with fingerprints next time!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.