Skip to comments.
Puerto Rico's Gay Marriage Ban UPHELD by Federal Judge
LA Slimes ^
| 21 Oct 2014
| Lauren Raab
Posted on 10/22/2014 7:45:38 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
EXACTLY. The Supreme Court has ALREADY de facto ruled on gay marriage in 1971, and essentially said that bans do NOT violate the Constitution. The Court recently chose not to overrule this previous ruling, which means that ACTUALLY, gay "marriage" bans are completely constitutional by the Court's own admission.
To: Yashcheritsiy
Cue Cir Ct overturning it in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... *sigh*
To: Yashcheritsiy
To: Yashcheritsiy; P-Marlowe
Put this judge on the Supreme Court. Wow. Someone who gets it right
4
posted on
10/22/2014 7:49:55 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: xzins
Put this judge on the Supreme Court. Wow. Someone who gets it right is he a wise latin??
5
posted on
10/22/2014 7:52:01 AM PDT
by
ealgeone
To: Yashcheritsiy
Ultimately, he wrote, the very survival of the political order depends upon the procreative potential embodied in traditional marriage.
No matter what the evil SCOTUS decides, God bless this man for taking a common sense stand against all these nutjobs in robes.
6
posted on
10/22/2014 7:52:32 AM PDT
by
Politicalkiddo
(Our obligations to our country never cease but with our lives.- John Adams)
To: Yashcheritsiy
Ultimately,"he wrote, the very survival of the political order depends upon the procreative potential embodied in traditional marriage.This statement is brilliantly simple and clear.
7
posted on
10/22/2014 7:55:20 AM PDT
by
avenir
(I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
To: ealgeone
Often, The Greatest Minds Lie Hidden
8
posted on
10/22/2014 7:56:16 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: Politicalkiddo
“No matter what the evil SCOTUS decides, God bless this man for taking a common sense stand against all these nutjobs in robes.”
Amen, and let it be a testimony against them on that Day!
9
posted on
10/22/2014 7:56:49 AM PDT
by
avenir
(I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
To: Yashcheritsiy
I think that case back in 1971 was dismissed, due to a lack of a federal legal question, or some such legal status at the time. So that case is the Supreme Court precedent.
The homosexual marriage cases ruled on last year did not address whether there is a constitutional right to homosexual marriage.
To: Yashcheritsiy
So, did he uphold the ban because YT didn’t do it?
Is this a “conflict of PC groups”?
11
posted on
10/22/2014 8:01:22 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Yashcheritsiy
Ultimately, he wrote, the very survival of the political order depends upon the procreative potential embodied in traditional marriage.EXACTLY! A "sutainable" state requires future taxpayers... I would imagine that the Leftist argument would be to provide every Mexican, ISIS jihadist, and Obala patient defacto US citizenship... to make up for all the otherwise unproductive faggotry going on.
12
posted on
10/22/2014 8:06:45 AM PDT
by
Rodamala
To: Yashcheritsiy
Wow. He’s a *Carter* appointee.
Knock me over with a feather.
To: rrstar96; AuH2ORepublican; livius; adorno; wtc911; Willie Green; CGVet58; Clemenza; Narcoleptic; ...
Now posted in breaking news.
Puerto Rico Ping! Please Freepmail me if you want on or off the list.
14
posted on
10/22/2014 8:09:35 AM PDT
by
cll
(Serviam!)
To: Yashcheritsiy
maricones así lo siento
15
posted on
10/22/2014 8:14:26 AM PDT
by
Impala64ssa
(You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
To: Yashcheritsiy
So being that the gay community are a bunch of “lover’s of Broadway musicals” as they say, I suppose they’re singing a sad song today (from West Side Story)
“Puerto Rico . . .
You ugly island . . .
Island of tropic diseases. “
16
posted on
10/22/2014 8:17:36 AM PDT
by
Impala64ssa
(You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
To: Yashcheritsiy
To: RIghtwardHo
Can’t overturn it. It was dismissed with prejudice.
18
posted on
10/22/2014 8:30:08 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: Yashcheritsiy
Correct, that ol’ 1971 Baker vs. Nelson ruling. Good for PR.
To: MrB
Is the race baiting necessary? Here is a judge who is ruling on this law as he should based on precedent. If a Hispanic judge is doing what Whitey has failed to do, good for him, but race doesn’t have anything to do with his. Only right does.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson